Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Curious about other people’s thoughts on why Serena took Eden’s death so badly. Seems like the standard consequence for the crime. I guess I’m just surprised she took it so hard.
I’m really getting tired of the close ups on June. It’s done several times each episode. I get it, she’s upset.
I think Serena was devastated for several reasons. Eden was the kind of "good, pious girl" (her words) that Gilead was supposed to produce and reward. Serena liked and felt maternal toward her. But she chose "true love" over Gilead's ideology, which I suspect triggered her for several reasons. Serena, who despises her own husband, was sympathetic toward the young girl's quest for love and perhaps is realizing her loyalty to Giliead might not actually represent the right course of action. Presumably she would like" her own" daughter to experience love not just ideology and a bad arranged marriage.
Anonymous wrote:Curious about other people’s thoughts on why Serena took Eden’s death so badly. Seems like the standard consequence for the crime. I guess I’m just surprised she took it so hard.
I’m really getting tired of the close ups on June. It’s done several times each episode. I get it, she’s upset.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The metal balls already in the pool are chilling. You can see them in their before Eden and the guy even jump. So many souls already lost so tragically.
How is the manner of death determined for crimes in Gilead? We’ve seen hangings, shootings, drownings, the colonies where the women are worked to death. Such horrific deaths.
I was curious about how that was decided. watched this late so I may have missed something. Were they giving Eden a chance to repent and would they have spared her if she did? I think the guard was going in either way.
I was actually surprised she was downgraded from Econowife to Handmaid. Wasn’t that what essentially happened to June for the same “crime” of adultery. I would have liked to see Eden become a handmaid and Nick struggle to try to rescue them both in S3.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The metal balls already in the pool are chilling. You can see them in their before Eden and the guy even jump. So many souls already lost so tragically.
How is the manner of death determined for crimes in Gilead? We’ve seen hangings, shootings, drownings, the colonies where the women are worked to death. Such horrific deaths.
I was curious about how that was decided. watched this late so I may have missed something. Were they giving Eden a chance to repent and would they have spared her if she did? I think the guard was going in either way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In the season premiere, was “This Women’s Work” just the background music/soundtrack or was it actually playing in the stadium? Either way, it was the only off note for me. I had my first child in the 90s and that song was on everyone’s labor mix tape.
Geez, really? That's kind of like everyone who danced to "Every Breath You Take" at their weddings.
Anonymous wrote:The metal balls already in the pool are chilling. You can see them in their before Eden and the guy even jump. So many souls already lost so tragically.
How is the manner of death determined for crimes in Gilead? We’ve seen hangings, shootings, drownings, the colonies where the women are worked to death. Such horrific deaths.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And in the book each house also had “Ritas”, which were housekeepers.
I thought they were Marthas. Like the biblical Martha.
They are different roles. Marthas cook, Ritas clean.
It was smart of the series to combine the two characters into one, keeps the focus on the central dynamic.
Isn’t the Martha in the Wallingfords house named Rita?
Yes, she is. That’s brilliant.
Anonymous wrote:Wow! Great episode. Finally know who ended up in the pool.
Why the change of heart in Serena? Didn’t understand why Nick walked away from June when she sat at the table. Seemed like the first time she was actually comforting him instead of the other way around.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And in the book each house also had “Ritas”, which were housekeepers.
I thought they were Marthas. Like the biblical Martha.
They are different roles. Marthas cook, Ritas clean.
It was smart of the series to combine the two characters into one, keeps the focus on the central dynamic.
Isn’t the Martha in the Wallingfords house named Rita?
Yes, she is. That’s brilliant.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And in the book each house also had “Ritas”, which were housekeepers.
I thought they were Marthas. Like the biblical Martha.
They are different roles. Marthas cook, Ritas clean.
It was smart of the series to combine the two characters into one, keeps the focus on the central dynamic.
Isn’t the Martha in the Wallingfords house named Rita?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And in the book each house also had “Ritas”, which were housekeepers.
I thought they were Marthas. Like the biblical Martha.
They are different roles. Marthas cook, Ritas clean.
It was smart of the series to combine the two characters into one, keeps the focus on the central dynamic.