Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did the Wapo story even report that he kissed an 18 year old? I can understand that it would be appropriate if he slept with the 14 year old (which apparently he did not), but kissing an 18 year old? That's what makes it sounds like a hit piece to me. We all know how much the Wapo detests his brand of conservatism.

If they only reported the 14-year-old’s story, you all would have said that it’s only one claim and uncorroborated. So they found 30 sources backing up similar claims by four women and you still find a way to bitch and moan about it.

Wait, wait, corroborate what exactly? That he went on a date with an 18 year old? I didn't realize it was criminal now for 32 year olds to ask 18 year olds out on dates in Alabama.

"Gloria Thacker Deason says she was an 18-year-old cheerleader when Moore began taking her on dates that included bottles of Mateus Rosé wine. The legal drinking age in Alabama was 19. "

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did the Wapo story even report that he kissed an 18 year old? I can understand that it would be appropriate if he slept with the 14 year old (which apparently he did not), but kissing an 18 year old? That's what makes it sounds like a hit piece to me. We all know how much the Wapo detests his brand of conservatism.

Because he had been hitting on that girl since she was 16 and she rebuffed him. It establishes the predatory pattern.

This is what I am referring to: "Gloria Thacker Deason says she was an 18-year-old cheerleader when Moore began taking her on dates that included bottles of Mateus Rosé wine. The legal drinking age in Alabama was 19. "

Anonymous wrote:Why did the Wapo story even report that he kissed an 18 year old? I can understand that it would be appropriate if he slept with the 14 year old (which apparently he did not), but kissing an 18 year old? That's what makes it sounds like a hit piece to me. We all know how much the Wapo detests his brand of conservatism.

If they only reported the 14-year-old’s story, you all would have said that it’s only one claim and uncorroborated. So they found 30 sources backing up similar claims by four women and you still find a way to bitch and moan about it.

Anonymous wrote:More to the point, his buddies in Alabama are on board:

“There’s nothing to see here,” said Jim Zeigler, the state auditor and a longtime supporter of Mr. Moore. “Single man, early 30s, never been married, dating teenage girls. Never been married and he liked younger girls. According to The Washington Post account he never had sexual intercourse with any of them.”

Well doesn't it matter that he never had sex with them? That would make this worse, no? Having sex with a 14 year old versus kissing her?

Anonymous wrote:Why did the Wapo story even report that he kissed an 18 year old? I can understand that it would be appropriate if he slept with the 14 year old (which apparently he did not), but kissing an 18 year old? That's what makes it sounds like a hit piece to me. We all know how much the Wapo detests his brand of conservatism.

Because he had been hitting on that girl since she was 16 and she rebuffed him. It establishes the predatory pattern.

Anonymous wrote:Why did the Wapo story even report that he kissed an 18 year old? I can understand that it would be appropriate if he slept with the 14 year old (which apparently he did not), but kissing an 18 year old? That's what makes it sounds like a hit piece to me. We all know how much the Wapo detests his brand of conservatism.

This.

Why did the Wapo story even report that he kissed an 18 year old? I can understand that it would be appropriate if he slept with the 14 year old (which apparently he did not), but kissing an 18 year old? That's what makes it sounds like a hit piece to me. We all know how much the Wapo detests his brand of conservatism.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, no blanket condemnation of Moore from the right?

Underaged girls aren't off limits?

I would like some proof before condemnation.
All it takes is an allegation to destroy someone. And, the Dems know that.
All these years, and this person never spoke up? #notbelievingit

I hope you don't have kids. And if you do, I hope they don't allow their friends around you.

NP here. Do you always believe every accusation, no matter how long ago, no matter that there is zero proof? Seriously? I prefer to listen to all the facts before making a rush to judgment - no matter what the accusation is and regardless of the accuser's gender.

Just like Trump ... at least when the alleged perpetrator is a white msn with an assault rifle.

Pardon me? What on earth does this "scandal" have to do with white men and assault rifles? Stay on topic.

More to the point, his buddies in Alabama are on board:

“There’s nothing to see here,” said Jim Zeigler, the state auditor and a longtime supporter of Mr. Moore. “Single man, early 30s, never been married, dating teenage girls. Never been married and he liked younger girls. According to The Washington Post account he never had sexual intercourse with any of them.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, no blanket condemnation of Moore from the right?

Underaged girls aren't off limits?

Of course they are. Ask Anthony Weiner, Ed Murray, Jacob Schwartz, Robert Menendez, and of course - Jeffrey Epstein, just to name a few Democrats involved in underage sex scandals.

So, no blanket condemnation of all these men from the left?

JFC, I condemn ALL pediphiles and predators. Don't you? Or does it depend on their political affiliation? That's pretty crazy.

Of course. But it's always useful to remind Democrats of their own politicians' sex scandals. To hear you people talk about Republicans, one would think you guys are free of scandal. Right?

Why hasn't he been charged?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Liberals are getting hysterical about nothing

How is this nothing? And some of the people calling for him to step down are no liberals.

DP. I'm a conservative and think he should step down. However, I do agree that liberals are getting hysterical about something that doesn't warrant hysteria.

if it were your 14 year old daughter, I suppose you wouldn't be upset?

+1

I'd like to hear whether any of the Moore apologists in this thread would dismiss it if a 32 year old plied their daughter with alcohol, got undressed in front of her, and then had her put her hand on his penis.

#AlabamaShakes

Anonymous wrote:Why aren't Jeff Flake, John McCain and other senators calling for Bob Menendez to resign?

Oh, that's right, he's a member of the establishment. They'll protect their own but slander Roy Moore.

Was Bob Menendez caught diddling a 14-year-old girl? I must have missed that.

Anonymous wrote:Why aren't Jeff Flake, John McCain and other senators calling for Bob Menendez to resign?

Oh, that's right, he's a member of the establishment. They'll protect their own but slander Roy Moore.

Time for your Haldol.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Liberals are getting hysterical about nothing

How is this nothing? And some of the people calling for him to step down are no liberals.

DP. I'm a conservative and think he should step down. However, I do agree that liberals are getting hysterical about something that doesn't warrant hysteria.

if it were your 14 year old daughter, I suppose you wouldn't be upset?

+1

I'd like to hear whether any of the Moore apologists in this thread would dismiss it if a 32 year old plied their daughter with alcohol, got undressed in front of her, and then had her put her hand on his penis.