Anonymous wrote:Forgot Podesta, 21:41? Nice!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you think an indictment might change Trumpers’ minds?

If the indictment is for transactions and oaymensts before the election than no. And it shouldn’t. So far no collusion between Russia and Trump. Collusion between Hillary and Russia is now known.

This is true. Add to this, that both men were ousted

Agree.

It's such a relief that Papadopoulos didn't make that statement. It seemed pretty bad for Trump, when I read it. But if it was actually showing collusion between Hillary and Russia, then our sitting president isn't dirty.

Anonymous wrote:Forgot Podesta, 21:41? Nice!

The first big takeaway from Monday morning’s flurry of charging and plea documents with respect to Paul Manafort Jr., Richard Gates III and George Papadopoulos is this: The president of the United States had as his campaign chairman a man who had allegedly served for years as an unregistered foreign agent for a puppet government of Vladimir Putin, a man who was allegedly laundering remarkable sums of money even while running the now-president’s campaign, a man who allegedly lied about all of this to the FBI and the Justice Department.

The second big takeaway is even starker: A member of President Trump’s campaign team admits that he was working with people he knew to be tied to the Russian government to “arrange a meeting between the Campaign and the Russian government officials” and to obtain “dirt” on Hillary Clinton in the form of thousands of hacked emails—and that he lied about these activities to the FBI. He briefed President Trump on at least some of them.

President Trump, in short, had on his campaign at least one person, and allegedly two people, who actively worked with adversarial foreign governments in a fashion they sought to criminally conceal from investigators. One of them ran the campaign. The other, meanwhile, was interfacing with people he “understood to have substantial connections to Russian government officials” and with a person introduced to him as “a relative of Russian President Vladimir Putin with connections to senior Russian government officials.” All of this while President Trump was assuring the American people that he and his campaign had "nothing to do with Russia."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you think an indictment might change Trumpers’ minds?

If the indictment is for transactions and oaymensts before the election than no. And it shouldn’t. So far no collusion between Russia and Trump. Collusion between Hillary and Russia is now known.

This is true. Add to this, that both men were ousted

Agree.

It's such a relief that Papadopoulos didn't make that statement. It seemed pretty bad for Trump, when I read it. But if it was actually showing collusion between Hillary and Russia, then our sitting president isn't dirty.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It seems the flies are swarming around the dems...

I know, right? Mueller charges Trump's campaign manager and a campaign staffer with 12 counts and another staffer pleads guilty and gives a statement about collusion with Russia.

Poor Dems, in such trouble.

I would not be surprised to find out that the Pap guy was a plant put there to try and get Trump to collude. He worked SO hard at it and failed. LOL

A plant? What on earth are you smoking?

He's certainly not the only one who has tried really hard to collude *cough* Jr *cough* Kushner

Don Junior was also a plant, right? Ivana playing the long game.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It seems the flies are swarming around the dems...

I know, right? Mueller charges Trump's campaign manager and a campaign staffer with 12 counts and another staffer pleads guilty and gives a statement about collusion with Russia.

Poor Dems, in such trouble.

I would not be surprised to find out that the Pap guy was a plant put there to try and get Trump to collude. He worked SO hard at it and failed. LOL

A plant? What on earth are you smoking?

He's certainly not the only one who has tried really hard to collude *cough* Jr *cough* Kushner

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:now NBC is claiming via leaks that Podesta group and mercury are company a and B.

Wasn't manafort working for podesta during that timeperiod?

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/investigations/sources-podesta-group-mercury-are-companies-b-indictment-n815721

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/357884-podesta-group-is-one-of-the-companies-mentioned-in-manafort

Well isn't THAT fun for liberals!

\
Liberal here. Don't give a rat's ass about Podesta. And no other liberals seem to. Put that in your pipe.

Trump supporter here. Don’t give a rat’s ass about Manafort, Flynn, Page or any of those career political consultants. If Mueller wants to be viewed as fair and non partisan, he must investigate Obama administration’s handling of Russian uranium deal and Fusion GPS.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you think an indictment might change Trumpers’ minds?

If the indictment is for transactions and oaymensts before the election than no. And it shouldn’t. So far no collusion between Russia and Trump. Collusion between Hillary and Russia is now known.

This is true. Add to this, that both men were ousted

Agree.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:now NBC is claiming via leaks that Podesta group and mercury are company a and B.

Wasn't manafort working for podesta during that timeperiod?

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/investigations/sources-podesta-group-mercury-are-companies-b-indictment-n815721

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/357884-podesta-group-is-one-of-the-companies-mentioned-in-manafort

Well isn't THAT fun for liberals!

\
Liberal here. Don't give a rat's ass about Podesta. And no other liberals seem to. Put that in your pipe.

Trump supporter here. Don’t give a rat’s ass about Manafort, Flynn, Page or any of those career political consultants. If Mueller wants to be viewed as fair and non partisan, he must investigate Obama administration’s handling of Russian uranium deal and Fusion GPS.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you think an indictment might change Trumpers’ minds?

If the indictment is for transactions and oaymensts before the election than no. And it shouldn’t. So far no collusion between Russia and Trump. Collusion between Hillary and Russia is now known.

This is true. Add to this, that both men were ousted

Agree.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you think an indictment might change Trumpers’ minds?

If the indictment is for transactions and oaymensts before the election than no. And it shouldn’t. So far no collusion between Russia and Trump. Collusion between Hillary and Russia is now known.

This is true. Add to this, that both men were ousted