Anonymous wrote:I’d argue for schools that made in top 10 list of all of the Forbes, US News and WSJ rankings: HYPSM, Northwestern, Duke
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of weird parochialism and claims of boosterism here from people who apparently have never left Virginia.
+1. I have no affiliation to NW or U Chicago and am certainly not a grad of either, and I’ve always known them to be excellent, some of the best schools in the country. Same goes with Duke, and I also have a lot of respect for liberal arts colleges like Williams and Swarthmore. I don’t understand all the nitpicking and insult-throwing and attempts to control what people are allowed to think.
Attempt to control is the University of whales or the university of Buffalo insisting they belong with oxford and Cambridge. No dog in this fight. I have more respect for influential people whose children attended not so elite schools because they didn't involve themselves in shenanigans to get their kids to “elite” schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of weird parochialism and claims of boosterism here from people who apparently have never left Virginia.
+1. I have no affiliation to NW or U Chicago and am certainly not a grad of either, and I’ve always known them to be excellent, some of the best schools in the country. Same goes with Duke, and I also have a lot of respect for liberal arts colleges like Williams and Swarthmore. I don’t understand all the nitpicking and insult-throwing and attempts to control what people are allowed to think.
Anonymous wrote:Honestly just use US News or WSJ or whatever and be done with it. You all are pathetic.
Anonymous wrote:Elite:
Harvard
Stanford
Yale
MIT
Princeton
Columbia
(Wharton)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This question is a lot like asking someone their definition of rich. It’s both a relative and absolute thing. For the average person, a NW of $1+ million may be rich, yet it is “only” the 90th percentile. The Top 1% in NW is around $10 million. Even still, it’s mostly the 600+ billionaires that grab the headlines. And, within the billionaires, there are differences. Before Musk hit it big, Bezos, Buffet, and Gates (BBG) were a separate club. In sum, perceptions of rich depend on one’s awareness and life opportunities, but there are also the cold facts that define exclusivity.
Now, apply that same logic to colleges. Each year, about 5 million kids start a four-year school. The top 1% or 99th percentile, includes 50k kids. If the average freshman class at an upper-tier school is 2000, that’s 25 schools or the Top 25. In the analogy to “what is rich,” these kids are very rich. However, the Top 0.1% of kids, or 5000, go to the Top 3 schools. Traditionally, the well-educated considered those to be HPY. But, like BBG, there’s been one extra-special club, which is Harvard. As in wealth, distinctions other than these are mostly noise.
Oh Harvard....you were doing so great with your analysis until you had to ruin it at the very end. Did they forget to teach you voting yourself "extra-special" is not " extra-special" behavior? As for the "extra-special" BBG club......none of them sent their kids to study at your " extra-special" club. Strange.
Anonymous wrote:A lot of weird parochialism and claims of boosterism here from people who apparently have never left Virginia.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard
Yale
Stanford
MIT
Princeton
Columbia
Chicago
Penn
Northwestern
Duke
But all are excellent schools.
+1
+2
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard
Yale
Stanford
MIT
Princeton
Columbia
Chicago
Penn
Northwestern
Duke
But all are excellent schools.
+1