Anonymous wrote:This whole thread really is about democrats twisting themselves in pretzels to prove 1+1 does not equal 2.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Thats so funny because both Republicans and Democrats on the House Inteligence Committee looking into Susan Rice said she did nothing improper.

What Republicans? Name names.

They unhid the name of a US person under a FISA warrant and it was leaked to the public. Don't tell me she did nothing improper.

Trump's name in conjunction with an investigation by DOJ in the public IS prima facie evidence of wrong doing. If you don't get it, it's like water is wet by the fact that it's wet.


BTW, just because his name was unmasked doesn't mean the "fact of" the investigation with his name was not classified.


So HOW did his name get leaked given an ongoing investigation? Maybe by the same people who were actually "negotiating" with Hillary to give up her server(s) containing classified information?
I mean, how does this happen? Have you EVER heard of the FBI/DOJ "negotiating" with someone to give up evidence in a criminal investigation? NO. They come and TAKE it, with NO discussion. They're the FBI/DOJ for chrissake!

This whole political use of government to prosecute enemies stinks to high heaven.

Anonymous wrote:

Thats so funny because both Republicans and Democrats on the House Inteligence Committee looking into Susan Rice said she did nothing improper.

Anonymous wrote:Those who heard James Comey's testimony today should note that he said the National Security Advisor is absolutely allowed to request unmasking.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Susan Rice. Yep, the same one that lied about Benghazi.
Now, let’s see if she was also the one who leaked the names to the press.

Multiple sources tell Fox News that Susan Rice, former national security adviser under then-President Barack Obama, requested to unmask the names of Trump transition officials caught up in surveillance.

The unmasked names, of people associated with Donald Trump, were then sent to all those at the National Security Council, some at the Defense Department, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and then-CIA Director John Brennan – essentially, the officials at the top, including former Rice deputy Ben Rhodes.

The names were part of incidental electronic surveillance of candidate and President-elect Trump and people close to him, including family members, for up to a year before he took office.

When names of Americans are incidentally collected, they are supposed to be masked, meaning the name or names are redacted from reports – whether it is international or domestic collection, unless it is an issue of national security, crime or if their security is threatened in any way. There are loopholes and ways to unmask through backchannels, but Americans are supposed to be protected from incidental collection. Sources told Fox News that in this case, they were not.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/03/susan-rice-requested-to-unmask-names-trump-transition-officials-sources-say.html

Yeah, Susan Rice is too afraid to testify. Shame on her.

Thats so funny because both Republicans and Democrats on the House Inteligence Committee looking into Susan Rice said she did nothing improper.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Susan Rice. Yep, the same one that lied about Benghazi.
Now, let’s see if she was also the one who leaked the names to the press.

Multiple sources tell Fox News that Susan Rice, former national security adviser under then-President Barack Obama, requested to unmask the names of Trump transition officials caught up in surveillance.

The unmasked names, of people associated with Donald Trump, were then sent to all those at the National Security Council, some at the Defense Department, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and then-CIA Director John Brennan – essentially, the officials at the top, including former Rice deputy Ben Rhodes.

The names were part of incidental electronic surveillance of candidate and President-elect Trump and people close to him, including family members, for up to a year before he took office.

When names of Americans are incidentally collected, they are supposed to be masked, meaning the name or names are redacted from reports – whether it is international or domestic collection, unless it is an issue of national security, crime or if their security is threatened in any way. There are loopholes and ways to unmask through backchannels, but Americans are supposed to be protected from incidental collection. Sources told Fox News that in this case, they were not.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/03/susan-rice-requested-to-unmask-names-trump-transition-officials-sources-say.html

Yeah, Susan Rice is too afraid to testify. Shame on her.

Anonymous wrote:Susan Rice. Yep, the same one that lied about Benghazi.
Now, let’s see if she was also the one who leaked the names to the press.

Multiple sources tell Fox News that Susan Rice, former national security adviser under then-President Barack Obama, requested to unmask the names of Trump transition officials caught up in surveillance.

The unmasked names, of people associated with Donald Trump, were then sent to all those at the National Security Council, some at the Defense Department, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and then-CIA Director John Brennan – essentially, the officials at the top, including former Rice deputy Ben Rhodes.

The names were part of incidental electronic surveillance of candidate and President-elect Trump and people close to him, including family members, for up to a year before he took office.

When names of Americans are incidentally collected, they are supposed to be masked, meaning the name or names are redacted from reports – whether it is international or domestic collection, unless it is an issue of national security, crime or if their security is threatened in any way. There are loopholes and ways to unmask through backchannels, but Americans are supposed to be protected from incidental collection. Sources told Fox News that in this case, they were not.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/03/susan-rice-requested-to-unmask-names-trump-transition-officials-sources-say.html

Anonymous wrote:PP, why bother? Trumpites will deny facts even when confronted with irrefutable evidence. They'll argue for Trump's innocence even when he's convicted and behind bars, alongside his daughter, son-in-law, Guiliani, Manafort, etc.

Truth means nothing to these people. They've already drunk the Trump Kool-Aid, and they see only Trump-Truth, that plastic alternative bubble that Trump lives in, where it never rains on the largest inauguration crowd in history. Trump is mentally ill, and his supporters are happy to join him in the crazy-house.