Anonymous wrote:Thank you for the reminder. I set my DVr to record the series and only missed the first 17 minutes.

Anonymous wrote:Will anyone be watching the upcoming 3 documentary/ specials on JonBenet ? The first one starts tonight on a & e


http://www.bustle.com/articles/181796-all-of-the-jonbenet-ramsey-documentaries-being-released-for-the-20-year-anniversary-of-her-murder-offer

Anonymous wrote:Google Bill McReynolds letter daily camera. The letter the he wrote to the daily camera had similarities to the ransom note

Anonymous wrote:Bill McReynolds said- Almost everyone has written stories about me- the Denver papers, the tabloids, and even CNN. I've been on lots of tv shows. It's too late. There's nothing I can do about it. Lots of people think that I killed JonBenet, that Santa killed an angel.
He also said - Looking back, I always thought that if anyone wanted to do major damage to this family, they could do it at Christmas because they all adored Christmas.
Janet McReynolds wrote a play about a girl being sexually assaulted in a basement. She bragged about the award she won for it but when the police wanted a copy of it she would not give them one. Their own daughter was kidnapped with a friend on the same day December 26, twenty-two years prior to JB being killed. Mysteriously only the friend was molested and their daughter was made to watch. The perp was never found. Janet also was a movie reviewer for the Daily Camera at one time. The ransom note had many movie line references. And she just recently did a reading of poetry at her retirement home. The collection is called - Terminal Angel.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That's because the intruder theory really makes no sense, as has been reviewed ad nauseam on this site. The layout of the house, the timeline (*hours* spent in the house while the family was sleeping?), the lack of any evidence of entry, the Patsy-scribed ransom note collectively, details such as the child's favorite blanket retrieved from the dryer, really do rule out the logic of an intruder.

Did you watch the Smit video? Enough clues to warrant an investigation IMO.

I have to agree that it's at least possible. Smit's theory that the strangling came first and was sexually motivated (ugh, so awful) makes a lot of sense. Also, what sort of normal person knows how to make a strangulation device like that? And could a parent, even a panicked one, truly violate her daughter with a paintbrush? Also, the stun gun theory seems plausible -- especially since the marks and blue line match perfectly. But the ransom note? The pineapple? The clothing and blanket that seemingly only the parents could know about? Those don't support the intruder theory at all.

The autopsy showed that the head injury occurred first, prior to the strangulation. So I have to believe that anything else in the video you mention is not reliable.

Yes, bizarre how people want to believe some random detective rather than the denver police who were convinced it was someone in the family, even if the da wasn't wild about prosecuting.

Bizarre that the police wouldn't investigate all options.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was an intruder. Another girl in the neighborhood was attacked during the night in her house but the parents woke up and chased them away. That girl also had danced at the same studio as JB.

The girl was sexually assaulted and the parents stopped him and he fled. The parents believed that he had been lurking in the home for hours before they went to bed. The police refused to believe there could be any connection between the 2 cases. JB and this girls home were only 2 miles apart.