Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't those 2015s play against u12 in league competition? So thats playing up.

How would you know that level of detail for each 2015. Are you one of the parents or an admin/coach for FVU?

There's another post here that said the 2015s are from SYC.

If so, they play u12 EDP but not the same level of local 2015 teams they lost to.

All those 2015s can’t compete against 2013s physically or mentally, and especially the ones they have will end up on the bench.

Correct, they will probably be players 19-22 or whatever. Riding the bench but thinking they are building a resume to go for another club the following year.

Are these actual 2015s or 2014s that could play the new age, but decided not to do that?

Actual 2015s

I guess time will tell. Puberty is a big factor around this time.

SYC smokes them

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As an outsider who has a general awareness of FVU, I'm having trouble believing some of these comments that imply FVU is a dumpster fire... Here is what I know: FVU won 2 age groups in MA Division, VDA also won 2 age groups and ARL won 1. Also, as an unbiased observer, the track record of CW seems as good or better than any coach at ARL or VDA. FVU facilities not as good and college recruiting not as successful. Sounds like each of the three clubs can stake a claim to being the best depending on what criteria you use. What am I missing?

Fair summation of last year and the past influence of CW. However the past few years have been an administrative nightmare. Families gave them some leeway but after 2 years of poor management many families are moving on. The 13s will be good. 12s will take a small step back. 11s and up will take major steps back.

This is true, except I think 12s will get hit a little harder than anticipated.

12s will be fine. Only team that will compete with them is VDA.

That team is about to drop 50-60% of the goals scored with their losses to other teams. They won’t be hanging out with Wilmington but they also won’t be looking at playoffs next year.

You must have FVU confused with ARL

ARL lost their best player but the team didn’t need her to be successful. They won’t change much. FVU is going to have a very hard time without theirs.

Yall lost two. One overseas and the other couldn’t say no to BP. It should be a change felt. Maybe not extreme but the change will be felt. If I eat my words ill be ok with it. Just will mean its the system and not the players.

Lost 3

Heard same with defender as she's not on the roster.

This is for Arlington 2011?

yup. Got em on hold like she is the main character. Lol plot twist would be heading to BSC

Is this a different ARL 2011 defender than the one ARL 2011 and the one ARL 2010 who are both already practicing with the VDA 2011s?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't those 2015s play against u12 in league competition? So thats playing up.

How would you know that level of detail for each 2015. Are you one of the parents or an admin/coach for FVU?

There's another post here that said the 2015s are from SYC.

If so, they play u12 EDP but not the same level of local 2015 teams they lost to.

All those 2015s can’t compete against 2013s physically or mentally, and especially the ones they have will end up on the bench.

Correct, they will probably be players 19-22 or whatever. Riding the bench but thinking they are building a resume to go for another club the following year.

Are these actual 2015s or 2014s that could play the new age, but decided not to do that?

Actual 2015s

I guess time will tell. Puberty is a big factor around this time.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't those 2015s play against u12 in league competition? So thats playing up.

How would you know that level of detail for each 2015. Are you one of the parents or an admin/coach for FVU?

There's another post here that said the 2015s are from SYC.

If so, they play u12 EDP but not the same level of local 2015 teams they lost to.

All those 2015s can’t compete against 2013s physically or mentally, and especially the ones they have will end up on the bench.

Correct, they will probably be players 19-22 or whatever. Riding the bench but thinking they are building a resume to go for another club the following year.

Are these actual 2015s or 2014s that could play the new age, but decided not to do that?

Actual 2015s

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't those 2015s play against u12 in league competition? So thats playing up.

How would you know that level of detail for each 2015. Are you one of the parents or an admin/coach for FVU?

There's another post here that said the 2015s are from SYC.

If so, they play u12 EDP but not the same level of local 2015 teams they lost to.

All those 2015s can’t compete against 2013s physically or mentally, and especially the ones they have will end up on the bench.

Correct, they will probably be players 19-22 or whatever. Riding the bench but thinking they are building a resume to go for another club the following year.

Are these actual 2015s or 2014s that could play the new age, but decided not to do that?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't those 2015s play against u12 in league competition? So thats playing up.

How would you know that level of detail for each 2015. Are you one of the parents or an admin/coach for FVU?

There's another post here that said the 2015s are from SYC.

If so, they play u12 EDP but not the same level of local 2015 teams they lost to.

All those 2015s can’t compete against 2013s physically or mentally, and especially the ones they have will end up on the bench.

Correct, they will probably be players 19-22 or whatever. Riding the bench but thinking they are building a resume to go for another club the following year.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As an outsider who has a general awareness of FVU, I'm having trouble believing some of these comments that imply FVU is a dumpster fire... Here is what I know: FVU won 2 age groups in MA Division, VDA also won 2 age groups and ARL won 1. Also, as an unbiased observer, the track record of CW seems as good or better than any coach at ARL or VDA. FVU facilities not as good and college recruiting not as successful. Sounds like each of the three clubs can stake a claim to being the best depending on what criteria you use. What am I missing?

Fair summation of last year and the past influence of CW. However the past few years have been an administrative nightmare. Families gave them some leeway but after 2 years of poor management many families are moving on. The 13s will be good. 12s will take a small step back. 11s and up will take major steps back.

This is true, except I think 12s will get hit a little harder than anticipated.

12s will be fine. Only team that will compete with them is VDA.

That team is about to drop 50-60% of the goals scored with their losses to other teams. They won’t be hanging out with Wilmington but they also won’t be looking at playoffs next year.

You must have FVU confused with ARL

ARL lost their best player but the team didn’t need her to be successful. They won’t change much. FVU is going to have a very hard time without theirs.

Yall lost two. One overseas and the other couldn’t say no to BP. It should be a change felt. Maybe not extreme but the change will be felt. If I eat my words ill be ok with it. Just will mean its the system and not the players.

Lost 3

Heard same with defender as she's not on the roster.

This is for Arlington 2011?

yup. Got em on hold like she is the main character. Lol plot twist would be heading to BSC

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't those 2015s play against u12 in league competition? So thats playing up.

How would you know that level of detail for each 2015. Are you one of the parents or an admin/coach for FVU?

There's another post here that said the 2015s are from SYC.

If so, they play u12 EDP but not the same level of local 2015 teams they lost to.

All those 2015s can’t compete against 2013s physically or mentally, and especially the ones they have will end up on the bench.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't those 2015s play against u12 in league competition? So thats playing up.

How would you know that level of detail for each 2015. Are you one of the parents or an admin/coach for FVU?

There's another post here that said the 2015s are from SYC.

If so, they play u12 EDP but not the same level of local 2015 teams they lost to.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As an outsider who has a general awareness of FVU, I'm having trouble believing some of these comments that imply FVU is a dumpster fire... Here is what I know: FVU won 2 age groups in MA Division, VDA also won 2 age groups and ARL won 1. Also, as an unbiased observer, the track record of CW seems as good or better than any coach at ARL or VDA. FVU facilities not as good and college recruiting not as successful. Sounds like each of the three clubs can stake a claim to being the best depending on what criteria you use. What am I missing?

Fair summation of last year and the past influence of CW. However the past few years have been an administrative nightmare. Families gave them some leeway but after 2 years of poor management many families are moving on. The 13s will be good. 12s will take a small step back. 11s and up will take major steps back.

This is true, except I think 12s will get hit a little harder than anticipated.

12s will be fine. Only team that will compete with them is VDA.

That team is about to drop 50-60% of the goals scored with their losses to other teams. They won’t be hanging out with Wilmington but they also won’t be looking at playoffs next year.

You must have FVU confused with ARL

ARL lost their best player but the team didn’t need her to be successful. They won’t change much. FVU is going to have a very hard time without theirs.

Yall lost two. One overseas and the other couldn’t say no to BP. It should be a change felt. Maybe not extreme but the change will be felt. If I eat my words ill be ok with it. Just will mean its the system and not the players.

Lost 3

Heard same with defender as she's not on the roster.

This is for Arlington 2011?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As an outsider who has a general awareness of FVU, I'm having trouble believing some of these comments that imply FVU is a dumpster fire... Here is what I know: FVU won 2 age groups in MA Division, VDA also won 2 age groups and ARL won 1. Also, as an unbiased observer, the track record of CW seems as good or better than any coach at ARL or VDA. FVU facilities not as good and college recruiting not as successful. Sounds like each of the three clubs can stake a claim to being the best depending on what criteria you use. What am I missing?

Fair summation of last year and the past influence of CW. However the past few years have been an administrative nightmare. Families gave them some leeway but after 2 years of poor management many families are moving on. The 13s will be good. 12s will take a small step back. 11s and up will take major steps back.

This is true, except I think 12s will get hit a little harder than anticipated.

12s will be fine. Only team that will compete with them is VDA.

That team is about to drop 50-60% of the goals scored with their losses to other teams. They won’t be hanging out with Wilmington but they also won’t be looking at playoffs next year.

You must have FVU confused with ARL

ARL lost their best player but the team didn’t need her to be successful. They won’t change much. FVU is going to have a very hard time without theirs.

Yall lost two. One overseas and the other couldn’t say no to BP. It should be a change felt. Maybe not extreme but the change will be felt. If I eat my words ill be ok with it. Just will mean its the system and not the players.

Lost 3

Heard same with defender as she's not on the roster.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't those 2015s play against u12 in league competition? So thats playing up.

How would you know that level of detail for each 2015. Are you one of the parents or an admin/coach for FVU?

There's another post here that said the 2015s are from SYC.

Anonymous wrote:Give it a &^%*ing rest. Union caps girls rosters at 18 for U13 and U14. Full stop. Go troll elsewhere VDA and stop deflecting from the fact you cut all but 5 of your 2012s. Some development over the last two years, eh.