Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dont worry, she will use her daughter to draw in your kid, shall we say lady bugAnonymous wrote:Reports like this make me grateful I have avoided McLean for all four of my DCs. The club seems to struggle for identity, perhaps because it is small, so it defaults to a country club environment dominated by parent capture. TM sounds like a disaster, glad they locked their team in for next year so the toxicity doesn’t metastasize to the clubs we play at.
Huge problems ahead for this team. The dynamic has already chased out its best player (leaving next year). When you let a parent become the queen and the coach become her vassal, you end up with something that might work for a while but it eventually collapses, especially when the queen decamps for another realm.
Can someone explain this further? It's one person, and even if that somehow results in more playing time for one player, there are 10 other players on the field next year.
Parent-controlled teams always break apart. There are countless examples including most recently, 2012 SYC.
Anonymous wrote:Depressing story, we will not be trying out. Sometimes these message boards are terrible but this seems to be the consensus view of this MYS team. Too bad. Maybe in a year or two.
kdsdad wrote:*
bold postkdsdad wrote:*
No, this combo is special. Don’t project.Anonymous wrote:omg, isn't this the story of every team at every age group? I think I've heard this exact same story for every good team in 2014 age group (SYC, GFR, MYS, Loudoun, Arlington). One player/family leaves, complains excessively about how unfair the situation is, goes to a new perfect team where there are no problems, and the old team comes crying back asking for forgiveness. At u13, every player is replaceable, whether that's the 'best' u13 player/family or the coach's favorite. Every team will find new talent, even if parents try to tear down their old team.
Anonymous wrote:because the team manager mom won’t let them. She loves the Art of SoccerAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok, so your kid is the one who hasn’t yet, but most others have. Most aren’t going to FVU and most of those kids are staying together. It is a bad look to sit on the offer for several weeks, especially as all the other sessions continue to get delayed. I am sure you know this but coaches are spiteful, so just be careful.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Correct. Most of the rising u13 team is locked in already. Probably only a few spots left at this point.Anonymous wrote:some MYS offers went out based on those practice sessions. Official ID session is February 17. See: https://mcleansoccer.org/ga-idsessions/ for details
But not all of their best girls committed.
Nice try but not my kid. A bad look is a club trying to lock kids in during the Fall season for a team that won’t play until almost a year later. They are using fomo against you and you’re trying to use that as a reason for why others should make rushed decisions without complete information.
Asking families to commit in November for the following year is a sh*tty thing to do especially for rising u13 kids. But I wouldn’t expect any less from that clown of a coach.
just curious on the hostility here since we're considering MYS as an option. An old teammates moved to the team and they seem generally happy with the situation. Why don't people like the coach? I know he moved over from VYS, but he doesn't seem as polarizing as other coaches mentioned here.
I’ve heard positive things as well. The only negative is roster size.
There is one parent who runs the team from behind the curtain. And not in a good way. And the coach prefers the girls who buy his private training services. If you’re not tithing, you’re not getting minutes.
Eww, but if so, why would everyone want to stay together with that situation?
Anonymous wrote:because the team manager mom won’t let them. She loves the Art of SoccerAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok, so your kid is the one who hasn’t yet, but most others have. Most aren’t going to FVU and most of those kids are staying together. It is a bad look to sit on the offer for several weeks, especially as all the other sessions continue to get delayed. I am sure you know this but coaches are spiteful, so just be careful.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Correct. Most of the rising u13 team is locked in already. Probably only a few spots left at this point.Anonymous wrote:some MYS offers went out based on those practice sessions. Official ID session is February 17. See: https://mcleansoccer.org/ga-idsessions/ for details
But not all of their best girls committed.
Nice try but not my kid. A bad look is a club trying to lock kids in during the Fall season for a team that won’t play until almost a year later. They are using fomo against you and you’re trying to use that as a reason for why others should make rushed decisions without complete information.
Asking families to commit in November for the following year is a sh*tty thing to do especially for rising u13 kids. But I wouldn’t expect any less from that clown of a coach.
just curious on the hostility here since we're considering MYS as an option. An old teammates moved to the team and they seem generally happy with the situation. Why don't people like the coach? I know he moved over from VYS, but he doesn't seem as polarizing as other coaches mentioned here.
I’ve heard positive things as well. The only negative is roster size.
There is one parent who runs the team from behind the curtain. And not in a good way. And the coach prefers the girls who buy his private training services. If you’re not tithing, you’re not getting minutes.
Eww, but if so, why would everyone want to stay together with that situation?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dont worry, she will use her daughter to draw in your kid, shall we say lady bugAnonymous wrote:Reports like this make me grateful I have avoided McLean for all four of my DCs. The club seems to struggle for identity, perhaps because it is small, so it defaults to a country club environment dominated by parent capture. TM sounds like a disaster, glad they locked their team in for next year so the toxicity doesn’t metastasize to the clubs we play at.
Huge problems ahead for this team. The dynamic has already chased out its best player (leaving next year). When you let a parent become the queen and the coach become her vassal, you end up with something that might work for a while but it eventually collapses, especially when the queen decamps for another realm.
Can someone explain this further? It's one person, and even if that somehow results in more playing time for one player, there are 10 other players on the field next year.
Parent-controlled teams always break apart. There are countless examples including most recently, 2012 SYC.
How can one parent or even a few parents control a team? I don't understand what that means or looks like.