Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So it seems almost obvious that Trump ordered hits on Epstein and Guiffre, right? Ghislaine Maxwell should maybe be worried

I am as anti-Trump as you can get, but it's silly to think Trump was the only one who wanted Epstein dead. Epstein was tangled up in a lot of nefarious business dealings with all kinds of powerful people. I wouldn't be surprised if a foreign entity was behind it. But let's be real, regardless of who actually arranged the hit, there are lots of people who breathed a sigh of relief once it happened.

.

Why haas there been no reporting on the guards who were supposedly asleep when Epstein died? I’ve read they were fired. Were they paid off or are they even still alive? Why haven’t they had to testify to Congress?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We do not know whose name was redacted.

Republicans have stated that it was a victim who has stated that Mr. Trump did nothing inappropriate. This helps Mr. Trump if, in fact, that was the name which was redacted.

A real concern regarding the Epstein files is whether or not it contains allegations and details of money laundering for Russia. This concern was raised recently by a prominent Democrat strategist on a major cable news network a couple of days ago.

I have always believed that it is the money laundering is what will ultimately bring him down.

+1
Our government will forgive a lot of things, but they hate a tax cheat.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the emails, Jeffrey Epstein plotted with Steve Bannon to discredit Christine Blasey Ford and get Trump judge Brett Kavanaugh confirmed.

This is getting fun.

Could Kavanaugh have been a recipient of Epstein's hospitality? Wouldn't that be something to talk about!

We never did find out who paid off Kavanaugh's credit card debt...

Epstein?!

Maga: Prosecute Clinton for getting a blowjob.

Allegations of Trump and Epstein surface (among others).

Maga: I need proof despite what my eyes see on the years of photos and video footage. Now that I have it, I'm parsing out and making excuses that these abused children weren't young enough.

Thank god my moral compass is better than that of the current republican party.

Anonymous wrote:For the people on board with the spy-connections theories, this was interesting. Text exchange from 2018, I’m not sure who was the 2nd man. This follows a reference to someone named “Ivana,” no context so it’s not necessarily Trump’s first wife, but she’s described as older than HRC:

Redacted guy: Was she a madame Claude associate’?

JE: No, Claude only took educated women

RG: Ouch

JE: They all went to accent reduction class. Taught by a guy that told great stories. Sam Chwat

JE: She reported to and was protected by French intelligence

JE: They were referred to not as red sparrows but as French swallows. An amazing intel op

https://journaliststudio.google.com/pinpoint/document-view?collection=092314e384a58618&utm_source=collection_share_link&p=1&docid=4226062bf8cfe1d3_092314e384a58618_0&dapvm=2

There's no doubt foreign intelligence agencies were using the swirl around Epstein and his high-profile friends for their own purposes. Way before everything became public, JP Morgan dropped Epstein as a client because of all the questionable things. If JP Morgan knows, every competent foreign intelligence agency knows.

If we actually had a competent FBI, we could figure out what was compromised. But we have Kash Patel and Pam Bondi, so that's not happening. There's very much a national security angle to all of this. But alas, the Senate confirmed idiots and sycophants, so it will have to wait for another administration until we have a real autopsy of the damage.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember, Leavitt’s husband was 47 when she was 15, so she may not have the clearest vision about how wrong this operation was.

(Not saying they knew each other at that time, but pointing out that she may not share our disgust about older men who get off on sex with MUCH younger women)

Karoline worked for Trump during college, in his first administration. She gave birth to a baby at 25 during the 2024 campaign. When the baby was 7 months old she married a man 33 years her senior despite no history of any romance between them. Her husband is a real estate millionaire and Trump acolyte. It makes no sense that a rich man would want his wife working and traveling when “their” child is in tender years. Trump waxes about her beauty and her lips. Who is the real father?

You sound like a foreign troll.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember, Leavitt’s husband was 47 when she was 15, so she may not have the clearest vision about how wrong this operation was.

(Not saying they knew each other at that time, but pointing out that she may not share our disgust about older men who get off on sex with MUCH younger women)

Karoline worked for Trump during college, in his first administration. She gave birth to a baby at 25 during the 2024 campaign. When the baby was 7 months old she married a man 33 years her senior despite no history of any romance between them. Her husband is a real estate millionaire and Trump acolyte. It makes no sense that a rich man would want his wife working and traveling when “their” child is in tender years. Trump waxes about her beauty and her lips. Who is the real father?

This is so revolting. I didn't know she had the baby out of wedlock. Lisandra, who plays her every day on IG, has always portrayed her as having a thing for Trump.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wish they had released more context regarding what Epstein/Maxwell were talking about at the time.

My guess is that Epstein thought that Trump was the guy who narced on him because of their falling out over that real estate deal.

My guess is Trump knowingly had sex with an underage trafficked victim in Epstein's house based on this latest leak of Epstein saying Trump spent hours with a victim. Hey MAGAs, what do you think Trump was doing with one of Epstein's girls? Discussing the weather?

The female in question needs to come forward. That's the only way. Everything else is innuendo and allegation.

You are assuming that she is still alive.

Anonymous wrote:So where is the smoking gun?

In the thousands and thousands of of pieces of evidence that come together to make an undeniable conclusion.

You sound like R. Kelly's grandma in the Chapelle's Show sketch. "Sure he may have been best friends with Epstein, sure he might have flown on his plane countless times, sure he may have sent Epstein a letter with a drawing of a prepubescent girl's body saying they shared a "wonderful secret," sure the recent emails have Epstein specifically stating Trump knew everything that was going on, sure there was sworn testimony from a 13 year old girl saying Trump sexually abused her, but unless I see a photo of Trump banging that 13 year old girl while both her and him are holding copies of their birth certificates with a notary witnessing the rape I couldn't possibly believe it!"

Anonymous wrote:Remember, Leavitt’s husband was 47 when she was 15, so she may not have the clearest vision about how wrong this operation was.

(Not saying they knew each other at that time, but pointing out that she may not share our disgust about older men who get off on sex with MUCH younger women)

Karoline worked for Trump during college, in his first administration. She gave birth to a baby at 25 during the 2024 campaign. When the baby was 7 months old she married a man 33 years her senior despite no history of any romance between them. Her husband is a real estate millionaire and Trump acolyte. It makes no sense that a rich man would want his wife working and traveling when “their” child is in tender years. Trump waxes about her beauty and her lips. Who is the real father?

Anonymous wrote:So where is the smoking gun?

If you are not disgusted by all of these adults interactions with children you are sick.

For the people on board with the spy-connections theories, this was interesting. Text exchange from 2018, I’m not sure who was the 2nd man. This follows a reference to someone named “Ivana,” no context so it’s not necessarily Trump’s first wife, but she’s described as older than HRC:

Redacted guy: Was she a madame Claude associate’?

JE: No, Claude only took educated women

RG: Ouch

JE: They all went to accent reduction class. Taught by a guy that told great stories. Sam Chwat

JE: She reported to and was protected by French intelligence

JE: They were referred to not as red sparrows but as French swallows. An amazing intel op

https://journaliststudio.google.com/pinpoint/document-view?collection=092314e384a58618&utm_source=collection_share_link&p=1&docid=4226062bf8cfe1d3_092314e384a58618_0&dapvm=2

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Trump really wouldn’t care if people knew he molested teenage girls. His public comments are of someone who DGAF. I am actually wondering if there are financial crimes in the case. He would care about looking poor or doing bad deals.

This. 100% People will twist themselves into pretzels to defend the sexual assaults. There are crimes being covered up that can't be as easily explained away (to be clear - I'm not saying the sexual assaults are excusable - I'm saying his supporters will have excuses) and have much greater implications than just Trump.

Anyone who tries to rationalize the crimes against these teenagers are disgusting and almost as bad as the men exploiting them. It’s heinous to dismiss what Epstein et al did.

Megyn Kelly is laying the groundwork by saying that the victims were teenaged versus younger ergo it's not too bad.

I’m sick today and going through the documents out of bored curiosity. It’s been fascinating getting a peek behind the curtain into the private lives of names in the news, but I have to move on because it feels too gross both that these people exist and that I’m curious about it.

Anyway, I came across a legal document related to the 2008 case that attached depositions from at least one victim, and it was horrifying. To read the girl’s account in her own words … she was so clearly a teenager. And not a particularly mature or savvy one. No one could read her words and see her as anything other than a child.

I only skimmed a few paragraphs and hate that what I read now lives in my head, but with that strong warning, if anyone is curious about the legal agreements in 2008 or the witness accounts, here’s the document:

https://journaliststudio.google.com/pinpoint/document-view?collection=092314e384a58618&utm_source=collection_share_link&p=1&docid=cef3d143e8bcbdbf_092314e384a58618_0&dapvm=2

So where is the smoking gun?

What is more problematic for Republicans today? Blowing Bubba or raping underage girls?

Or is this all acceptable for Republicans today? If I had to put a nickel on who's blowing Bubba, I can think of several prominent Republicans.

And to be clear, there's nothing wrong with blowing Bubba if that's how you roll. But if Donald Trump and Mike Johnson and Josh Hawley and Lindsey Graham are all rolling like this, they should be upfront about it. We are a modern country.