Anonymous
09/16/2025 01:29
Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The WF signal chats about the website have been unsealed and there is nothing there, nada.
Link, please! I'm too lazy to look through Reddit
nvm found it
Anonymous
09/16/2025 00:59
Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Anonymous wrote:The WF signal chats about the website have been unsealed and there is nothing there, nada.
Link, please! I'm too lazy to look through Reddit
Anonymous
09/15/2025 23:53
Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Anonymous wrote:The WF signal chats about the website have been unsealed and there is nothing there, nada.
I was impressed with Heath's demeanor and horrified that Freedman just wanted to push it out and fix it later.
Anonymous
09/15/2025 23:46
Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
The WF signal chats about the website have been unsealed and there is nothing there, nada.
Anonymous
09/15/2025 14:44
Subject: Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2
Anonymous wrote:Shapiro was number one in her law school class, that’s pretty darn impressive.
I’m pretty excited because I think there is a chance this means they are going to appeal the MTD decision, The NY Times was asking for a final order just last week. I think that would be very interesting.
And to clarify, there is an associate at this firm that clerked for Liman. Perhaps Gottlieb is out of the golf foursome after all.
In all seriousness, I don’t think that the WF lawyers have been as bad as the Blake supporters like to claim, but I posted right after the motion to dismiss decision that WF needed someone who understood Liman’s way of thinking. I still think that.
Alternatively they could be thinking of bringing a challenge to the constitutionality of the CA statute . Can’t wait to see.