Anonymous wrote:Bullis!!! 6-6 against Potomac.

Anonymous wrote:Bullis!!! 6-6 against Potomac.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ISL will be interesting this year. Wouldn't surprise me if Visi came in fourth behind SSSAS, Potomac and SR. Visi is good too, but the other 3 may be better.

Only thing interesting in the WCAC will be who comes in 3rd or 4th - BI or PVI. GC is a lock for first and SJC lock for second place.

If I was a Visi person I'd be stoked to be a sleeper - they might mess around and win the whole thing.

Visi is more likely to come in #5 than #1.

I don't know about this. Which ISL school do you think is capable of sliding in as number 4--assuming SR, Potomac, and SSSAS are 1-3 (in some order)?

Visi has 8 commits to good schools and perhaps the best player in the DC area. Couple of good freshman too. I would expect there to be a battle for the top 4 for sure, but Visi could sneak in, so I'm with the sleeper camp.

SR/Visi/Potomac/SSSAS

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ISL will be interesting this year. Wouldn't surprise me if Visi came in fourth behind SSSAS, Potomac and SR. Visi is good too, but the other 3 may be better.

Only thing interesting in the WCAC will be who comes in 3rd or 4th - BI or PVI. GC is a lock for first and SJC lock for second place.

If I was a Visi person I'd be stoked to be a sleeper - they might mess around and win the whole thing.

Visi is more likely to come in #5 than #1.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ISL will be interesting this year. Wouldn't surprise me if Visi came in fourth behind SSSAS, Potomac and SR. Visi is good too, but the other 3 may be better.

Only thing interesting in the WCAC will be who comes in 3rd or 4th - BI or PVI. GC is a lock for first and SJC lock for second place.

If I was a Visi person I'd be stoked to be a sleeper - they might mess around and win the whole thing.

Anonymous wrote:ISL will be interesting this year. Wouldn't surprise me if Visi came in fourth behind SSSAS, Potomac and SR. Visi is good too, but the other 3 may be better.

Only thing interesting in the WCAC will be who comes in 3rd or 4th - BI or PVI. GC is a lock for first and SJC lock for second place.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ISL will be interesting this year. Wouldn't surprise me if Visi came in fourth behind SSSAS, Potomac and SR. Visi is good too, but the other 3 may be better.

Only thing interesting in the WCAC will be who comes in 3rd or 4th - BI or PVI. GC is a lock for first and SJC lock for second place.

BI is coming.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ISL will be interesting this year. Wouldn't surprise me if Visi came in fourth behind SSSAS, Potomac and SR. Visi is good too, but the other 3 may be better.

Only thing interesting in the WCAC will be who comes in 3rd or 4th - BI or PVI. GC is a lock for first and SJC lock for second place.

BI is coming.

Anonymous wrote:ISL will be interesting this year. Wouldn't surprise me if Visi came in fourth behind SSSAS, Potomac and SR. Visi is good too, but the other 3 may be better.

Only thing interesting in the WCAC will be who comes in 3rd or 4th - BI or PVI. GC is a lock for first and SJC lock for second place.

Anonymous wrote:Many teams used these first week scrimmages as tryouts for final roster adjustments. All teams sub a lot and play kids in different positions. It doesn’t mean anything but a 6-1 Potomac over SSSAS score is still very interesting. Like many have said in this chat, this is Potomac’s year. Besides talented players, they also have an all-star coaching staff. ISL will be very fun to watch this Spring.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was Potomac in the Bullis play day

Potomac played PVI, Bullis, SSSAS & Holy Child.

How did they look? Any scores?

Looked solid. Depth looks better. Heard they won all and subbed liberally. Only score I heard was 6-1 vs SSSAS.

Interesting that you got eyes on the games to conclude “they looked solid and depth looks better” and yet you had to hear about “they won all and subbed liberally” and that they beat SSSAS 6-1.

Untrue.

Not many, if any, conclusions should be drawn from abbreviated scrimmages. Pretty sure all squads were experimenting in various ways. Best judge of how scrimmages would be how coaches felt at end of day. I am sure, Bullis coach, SSSAS coach and Potomac coach all have their own interpretation of how day went and hopefully they got something out of it. That's all that these scrimmages purpose is.