Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s us go with objective PSAT scores and NNSF semi-finalists when they are declared for the class of 2025. Compare that with previous classes. ( before the equity mafia spins a yarn)

Or we could simply look at how TJ ranking dropped from #1 to #14 under the old selection process and conclude that these changes were necessary to restore TJ's reputation after the rampant gaming of selection in recent years.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So we can pretty much put a pin in this one.

The new policies have resulted in a drop in standardized testing scores both in general, and a significant drop in URM standardized test scores. This accounts for roughly 30% of the scoring rubric by USNews.

At the tippy top of the rankings, Im sure the margin is narrow and this is enough to drop many spots and will probably result in another drop next year.

Its pretty much just as nonsense as Great Schools rankings.

The drop in ranking highlights the declining standards at TJ. Specifically, without a merit-based entrance test, TJ admissions cannot select merit-based URM students from the pool of URM applicants.

Anonymous wrote:Let’s us go with objective PSAT scores and NNSF semi-finalists when they are declared for the class of 2025. Compare that with previous classes. ( before the equity mafia spins a yarn)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The caliber of Tj students has gone down and the rankings will reflect it. Not much to argue about. There will still be many gifted students who attend the school but they are surrounded by a lot of average students.

Yes. And the FCPS Board said they don’t care. They want representation from every middle school. Let it go.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s us go with objective PSAT scores and NNSF semi-finalists when they are declared for the class of 2025. Compare that with previous classes. ( before the equity mafia spins a yarn)

Lol

Bemoaning the US News ranking didn't work. Quick, pivot to something else!

ROFL

You don’t have data to back-up your claims. Just some BS equity drivel that barely masks Asian hate (TJ is less toxic, more deserving students got in). Show us better outcomes or shut up. Right now we have an equity dividend that brought the school from #1 to # 14. Number of remedial math students has gone up manifold. And PSAT for 2025 will be in the public domain in the next 6 months. What you got to show?

Out of total 2500+ applicants, a lower standard Algebra 1 math criteria was chosen to disqualified majority of the 1600+ Asian student applicants, who had higher Geometry/Algebra 2 math. In 2020, just 20+ algebra 1 students were admitted, but with admissions change in 2021, the algebra 1 offers went up to 198+. The US news ranking slide from 1st to 5th, and now to 14th reflects this declined talent in student body.

Anonymous wrote:The caliber of Tj students has gone down and the rankings will reflect it. Not much to argue about. There will still be many gifted students who attend the school but they are surrounded by a lot of average students.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s us go with objective PSAT scores and NNSF semi-finalists when they are declared for the class of 2025. Compare that with previous classes. ( before the equity mafia spins a yarn)

Lol

Bemoaning the US News ranking didn't work. Quick, pivot to something else!

ROFL

You don’t have data to back-up your claims. Just some BS equity drivel that barely masks Asian hate (TJ is less toxic, more deserving students got in). Show us better outcomes or shut up. Right now we have an equity dividend that brought the school from #1 to # 14. Number of remedial math students has gone up manifold. And PSAT for 2025 will be in the public domain in the next 6 months. What you got to show?

Anonymous wrote:The caliber of Tj students has gone down and the rankings will reflect it. Not much to argue about. There will still be many gifted students who attend the school but they are surrounded by a lot of average students.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s us go with objective PSAT scores and NNSF semi-finalists when they are declared for the class of 2025. Compare that with previous classes. ( before the equity mafia spins a yarn)

Lol

Bemoaning the US News ranking didn't work. Quick, pivot to something else!

ROFL

You don’t have data to back-up your claims. Just some BS equity drivel that barely masks Asian hate (TJ is less toxic, more deserving students got in). Show us better outcomes or shut up. Right now we have an equity dividend that brought the school from #1 to # 14. Number of remedial math students has gone up manifold. And PSAT for 2025 will be in the public domain in the next 6 months. What you got to show?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s us go with objective PSAT scores and NNSF semi-finalists when they are declared for the class of 2025. Compare that with previous classes. ( before the equity mafia spins a yarn)

Lol

Bemoaning the US News ranking didn't work. Quick, pivot to something else!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So we can pretty much put a pin in this one.

The new policies have resulted in a drop in standardized testing scores both in general, and a significant drop in URM standardized test scores. This accounts for roughly 30% of the scoring rubric by USNews.

At the tippy top of the rankings, Im sure the margin is narrow and this is enough to drop many spots and will probably result in another drop next year.

Its pretty much just as nonsense as Great Schools rankings.

The drop in ranking highlights the declining standards at TJ. Specifically, without a merit-based entrance test, TJ admissions cannot select merit-based URM students from the pool of URM applicants.

Yes, the drop in rankings was based on 2022 data before they fixed the broken selection criteria used by the old process.

Yeah that was the year of the freshman of the new selection process who were 25% FARMs (URM according to USNews) and represented a sizable increase in the URM population at TJ. They also scored significantly worse on SOLs as compared to previous years URM, albeit a very small number of students. This is not really up for debate.

And even more, the non-URM students of the new class scored worse than previous years,

Interestingly enough, average FCPS schools scored on average better than the previous year (2020-2021) result.

Anonymous wrote:Let’s us go with objective PSAT scores and NNSF semi-finalists when they are declared for the class of 2025. Compare that with previous classes. ( before the equity mafia spins a yarn)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So we can pretty much put a pin in this one.

The new policies have resulted in a drop in standardized testing scores both in general, and a significant drop in URM standardized test scores. This accounts for roughly 30% of the scoring rubric by USNews.

At the tippy top of the rankings, Im sure the margin is narrow and this is enough to drop many spots and will probably result in another drop next year.

Its pretty much just as nonsense as Great Schools rankings.

The drop in ranking highlights the declining standards at TJ. Specifically, without a merit-based entrance test, TJ admissions cannot select merit-based URM students from the pool of URM applicants.