Anonymous wrote:They should have steered around the pier
Anonymous wrote:They should have steered around the pier
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Realistically, it should not take more than a couple or few weeks to open shipping lane. NTSB needs to do their job. Then simply cut up the pieces in the shipping lane and haul out. The Navy could do this with ease
Really? There's an absolutely massive amount of twisted steel and concrete submerged in 50 feet of water. They'll have to cut the debris into pieces under water, bring in giant cranes to lift them up and out, put them on boats and haul them somewhere (where?). I think you're really underestimating how much work this will be.
Anonymous wrote:Realistically, it should not take more than a couple or few weeks to open shipping lane. NTSB needs to do their job. Then simply cut up the pieces in the shipping lane and haul out. The Navy could do this with ease
Anonymous wrote:Did anyone learn what was stored in the ship’s containers?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I know they are saying this was an accident, not terrorism, nothing deliberate.
But isn't it suspicious that the power on the ship went out right when it did, just minutes before it would go under the very vulnerable bridge? Any earlier, and the ship would have been able to slow down, or use backup power right?
If someone had planned to disable a ship just at the right time, this is when they would do it. Is it possible this was planned?
How often does the power go out on these ships, in general?
From all appearances, this is just good old fashioned corporate greed here. The negligence that results from putting profits above all else is truly terrorizing indeed.
Why are you saying corporate greed?
Lack of maintenance on the ship resulting in the power loss
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I know they are saying this was an accident, not terrorism, nothing deliberate.
But isn't it suspicious that the power on the ship went out right when it did, just minutes before it would go under the very vulnerable bridge? Any earlier, and the ship would have been able to slow down, or use backup power right?
If someone had planned to disable a ship just at the right time, this is when they would do it. Is it possible this was planned?
How often does the power go out on these ships, in general?
From all appearances, this is just good old fashioned corporate greed here. The negligence that results from putting profits above all else is truly terrorizing indeed.
Why are you saying corporate greed?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I know they are saying this was an accident, not terrorism, nothing deliberate.
But isn't it suspicious that the power on the ship went out right when it did, just minutes before it would go under the very vulnerable bridge? Any earlier, and the ship would have been able to slow down, or use backup power right?
If someone had planned to disable a ship just at the right time, this is when they would do it. Is it possible this was planned?
How often does the power go out on these ships, in general?
From all appearances, this is just good old fashioned corporate greed here. The negligence that results from putting profits above all else is truly terrorizing indeed.
Why are you saying corporate greed?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I know they are saying this was an accident, not terrorism, nothing deliberate.
But isn't it suspicious that the power on the ship went out right when it did, just minutes before it would go under the very vulnerable bridge? Any earlier, and the ship would have been able to slow down, or use backup power right?
If someone had planned to disable a ship just at the right time, this is when they would do it. Is it possible this was planned?
How often does the power go out on these ships, in general?
From all appearances, this is just good old fashioned corporate greed here. The negligence that results from putting profits above all else is truly terrorizing indeed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I know they are saying this was an accident, not terrorism, nothing deliberate.
But isn't it suspicious that the power on the ship went out right when it did, just minutes before it would go under the very vulnerable bridge? Any earlier, and the ship would have been able to slow down, or use backup power right?
If someone had planned to disable a ship just at the right time, this is when they would do it. Is it possible this was planned?
How often does the power go out on these ships, in general?
If someone planned this, they would have done it during peak rush hour.