Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jessica Berman (NWSL Commissioner) spoke about Academies again today.
https://theathletic.com/5337948/2024/03/13/jessica-berman-nwsl-calendar-world-cup/
Berman also envisioned teams being willing to invest more in youth talent development because of the opportunity for a financial return even if that player didn’t end up on the first team. While some NWSL clubs have either reserve teams, such as Racing Louisville’s W League team, or relationships with youth academies, these elements aren’t yet baked into each club’s infrastructure.
LOL, she spoke about many things and the word academies wasn't used the way you want to believe. Yeah, read it again, look at the timeline and then ask yourself, this "will my kid ever benefit from whatever hypothetical she even means?"
Everyone here wants a more professional academy system installed but she spoke in very vaguely and in generalities about loose idea of 5 year plan.
If your kid is a 2012, the announcement of such a league may not happen for at least five years. She also never mentioned GA, ECNL or anything.
You are reading into a lot of tea leaves that such an undertaking is happening soon when she also listed many more imminent things on the horizon. Stadiums, network deals, expansion, transfer fees, etc. Your paragraph was pretty much at the end of the article. Your GA academy system is not happening soon. She seemed more interested in teams being able to fill out reserve teams first and work from there on down over time.
Working with Youth Academies, like Racing Louisville, for example might mean little more than the occasional U17 getting to practice with the reserve squad if they are short. Spirit does this occasionally with local clubs. I could see NWSL trying to strengthen those lines of communication for finding players here and there but nothing as formal as league and full on academy as you envision.
"While some NWSL clubs have either reserve teams, such as Racing Louisville’s W League team, or relationships with youth academies, these elements aren’t yet baked into each club’s infrastructure." This sums it up. Teams already do this as they can. Straddling clubs with the required expense of an academy is not something the league is prepared to do just yet.
That's one interpretation. It could mean a lot of things.
However the FACT that the head of the NWSL is talking about engaging with youth says a lot.
Look at how MLS engages with youth and you'll see the most likely way NWSL will engage with youth.
There is no money to do much of anything. At best this is 5 to 10 years out and assumes growth in the Women's professional soccer that is suspect without a dominating national team. You can't look at MLS --- they have the money. It is highly likely that NWSL will not. Look the whole NWSL is not in great shape. They do ok; not great. Some of the owners have deep pockets most do not. MLS is mostly deep pockets.
Don't know what you're talking about women's soccer specifically USWNT and NWSL are booming.
No, it isn't booming. Growing? Yes, but booming? no way.
Yes booming NWSL quadrupled their media contract.
That's what booming looks like.
Average attendance is 15,000 with teams like Chicago only averaging 4800 a game.
Not booming
SD Wave is averaging 20k per game same as many MLS teams.
Booming
And Chicago is under 5000. That's how averages work. High School football games in Texas draw more than SD Wave.
Growing, not booming.
And Houston Dynamo (A MLS Team) averages 15000
https://soccerstadiumdigest.com/2023-mls-attendance/
Booming + proven that several NWSL clubs average higher than MLS attendance.
How many NWSL teams own their own stadiums? Do any own stadiums that even approach MLS stadiums? Owning the building generates revenue, when the wave get a huge number, SDSU benefits as much as the team
MLS implemented a homegrown rule in 2008. How many MLS teams had their own stadium in 2008?
Does that really matter? Unless there is political appetite to subsidize NWSL stadiums, NWSL teams will have an impossible task generating the kind of revenue that MLS teams expect
It matters because NWSL is at the same point in 2024 that MLS was in 2008.
This is why Jessica Berman is talking about "investing in youth" it's also why they'll likely implement some form of Academy soon.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jessica Berman (NWSL Commissioner) spoke about Academies again today.
https://theathletic.com/5337948/2024/03/13/jessica-berman-nwsl-calendar-world-cup/
Berman also envisioned teams being willing to invest more in youth talent development because of the opportunity for a financial return even if that player didn’t end up on the first team. While some NWSL clubs have either reserve teams, such as Racing Louisville’s W League team, or relationships with youth academies, these elements aren’t yet baked into each club’s infrastructure.
LOL, she spoke about many things and the word academies wasn't used the way you want to believe. Yeah, read it again, look at the timeline and then ask yourself, this "will my kid ever benefit from whatever hypothetical she even means?"
Everyone here wants a more professional academy system installed but she spoke in very vaguely and in generalities about loose idea of 5 year plan.
If your kid is a 2012, the announcement of such a league may not happen for at least five years. She also never mentioned GA, ECNL or anything.
You are reading into a lot of tea leaves that such an undertaking is happening soon when she also listed many more imminent things on the horizon. Stadiums, network deals, expansion, transfer fees, etc. Your paragraph was pretty much at the end of the article. Your GA academy system is not happening soon. She seemed more interested in teams being able to fill out reserve teams first and work from there on down over time.
Working with Youth Academies, like Racing Louisville, for example might mean little more than the occasional U17 getting to practice with the reserve squad if they are short. Spirit does this occasionally with local clubs. I could see NWSL trying to strengthen those lines of communication for finding players here and there but nothing as formal as league and full on academy as you envision.
"While some NWSL clubs have either reserve teams, such as Racing Louisville’s W League team, or relationships with youth academies, these elements aren’t yet baked into each club’s infrastructure." This sums it up. Teams already do this as they can. Straddling clubs with the required expense of an academy is not something the league is prepared to do just yet.
That's one interpretation. It could mean a lot of things.
However the FACT that the head of the NWSL is talking about engaging with youth says a lot.
Look at how MLS engages with youth and you'll see the most likely way NWSL will engage with youth.
There is no money to do much of anything. At best this is 5 to 10 years out and assumes growth in the Women's professional soccer that is suspect without a dominating national team. You can't look at MLS --- they have the money. It is highly likely that NWSL will not. Look the whole NWSL is not in great shape. They do ok; not great. Some of the owners have deep pockets most do not. MLS is mostly deep pockets.
Don't know what you're talking about women's soccer specifically USWNT and NWSL are booming.
No, it isn't booming. Growing? Yes, but booming? no way.
Yes booming NWSL quadrupled their media contract.
That's what booming looks like.
Average attendance is 15,000 with teams like Chicago only averaging 4800 a game.
Not booming
SD Wave is averaging 20k per game same as many MLS teams.
Booming
And Chicago is under 5000. That's how averages work. High School football games in Texas draw more than SD Wave.
Growing, not booming.
And Houston Dynamo (A MLS Team) averages 15000
https://soccerstadiumdigest.com/2023-mls-attendance/
Booming + proven that several NWSL clubs average higher than MLS attendance.
How many NWSL teams own their own stadiums? Do any own stadiums that even approach MLS stadiums? Owning the building generates revenue, when the wave get a huge number, SDSU benefits as much as the team
MLS implemented a homegrown rule in 2008. How many MLS teams had their own stadium in 2008?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jessica Berman (NWSL Commissioner) spoke about Academies again today.
https://theathletic.com/5337948/2024/03/13/jessica-berman-nwsl-calendar-world-cup/
Berman also envisioned teams being willing to invest more in youth talent development because of the opportunity for a financial return even if that player didn’t end up on the first team. While some NWSL clubs have either reserve teams, such as Racing Louisville’s W League team, or relationships with youth academies, these elements aren’t yet baked into each club’s infrastructure.
LOL, she spoke about many things and the word academies wasn't used the way you want to believe. Yeah, read it again, look at the timeline and then ask yourself, this "will my kid ever benefit from whatever hypothetical she even means?"
Everyone here wants a more professional academy system installed but she spoke in very vaguely and in generalities about loose idea of 5 year plan.
If your kid is a 2012, the announcement of such a league may not happen for at least five years. She also never mentioned GA, ECNL or anything.
You are reading into a lot of tea leaves that such an undertaking is happening soon when she also listed many more imminent things on the horizon. Stadiums, network deals, expansion, transfer fees, etc. Your paragraph was pretty much at the end of the article. Your GA academy system is not happening soon. She seemed more interested in teams being able to fill out reserve teams first and work from there on down over time.
Working with Youth Academies, like Racing Louisville, for example might mean little more than the occasional U17 getting to practice with the reserve squad if they are short. Spirit does this occasionally with local clubs. I could see NWSL trying to strengthen those lines of communication for finding players here and there but nothing as formal as league and full on academy as you envision.
"While some NWSL clubs have either reserve teams, such as Racing Louisville’s W League team, or relationships with youth academies, these elements aren’t yet baked into each club’s infrastructure." This sums it up. Teams already do this as they can. Straddling clubs with the required expense of an academy is not something the league is prepared to do just yet.
That's one interpretation. It could mean a lot of things.
However the FACT that the head of the NWSL is talking about engaging with youth says a lot.
Look at how MLS engages with youth and you'll see the most likely way NWSL will engage with youth.
There is no money to do much of anything. At best this is 5 to 10 years out and assumes growth in the Women's professional soccer that is suspect without a dominating national team. You can't look at MLS --- they have the money. It is highly likely that NWSL will not. Look the whole NWSL is not in great shape. They do ok; not great. Some of the owners have deep pockets most do not. MLS is mostly deep pockets.
Don't know what you're talking about women's soccer specifically USWNT and NWSL are booming.
No, it isn't booming. Growing? Yes, but booming? no way.
Yes booming NWSL quadrupled their media contract.
That's what booming looks like.
Average attendance is 15,000 with teams like Chicago only averaging 4800 a game.
Not booming
SD Wave is averaging 20k per game same as many MLS teams.
Booming
And Chicago is under 5000. That's how averages work. High School football games in Texas draw more than SD Wave.
Growing, not booming.
And Houston Dynamo (A MLS Team) averages 15000
https://soccerstadiumdigest.com/2023-mls-attendance/
Booming + proven that several NWSL clubs average higher than MLS attendance.
How many NWSL teams own their own stadiums? Do any own stadiums that even approach MLS stadiums? Owning the building generates revenue, when the wave get a huge number, SDSU benefits as much as the team
MLS implemented a homegrown rule in 2008. How many MLS teams had their own stadium in 2008?
Does that really matter? Unless there is political appetite to subsidize NWSL stadiums, NWSL teams will have an impossible task generating the kind of revenue that MLS teams expect
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I admit.
I wish more people were like you.
It's interesting how women have to deal with knuckleheads saying that they're not successful.
Look at the attendances of both MLS and NWSL teams. Yes, men are slightly higher but not a lot. Specifically not enough to justify the disparity in pay between men and women player pay.
Just wait, the next NWSL media deal is going to be double what it is now. Which will trickle down to player pay.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jessica Berman (NWSL Commissioner) spoke about Academies again today.
https://theathletic.com/5337948/2024/03/13/jessica-berman-nwsl-calendar-world-cup/
Berman also envisioned teams being willing to invest more in youth talent development because of the opportunity for a financial return even if that player didn’t end up on the first team. While some NWSL clubs have either reserve teams, such as Racing Louisville’s W League team, or relationships with youth academies, these elements aren’t yet baked into each club’s infrastructure.
LOL, she spoke about many things and the word academies wasn't used the way you want to believe. Yeah, read it again, look at the timeline and then ask yourself, this "will my kid ever benefit from whatever hypothetical she even means?"
Everyone here wants a more professional academy system installed but she spoke in very vaguely and in generalities about loose idea of 5 year plan.
If your kid is a 2012, the announcement of such a league may not happen for at least five years. She also never mentioned GA, ECNL or anything.
You are reading into a lot of tea leaves that such an undertaking is happening soon when she also listed many more imminent things on the horizon. Stadiums, network deals, expansion, transfer fees, etc. Your paragraph was pretty much at the end of the article. Your GA academy system is not happening soon. She seemed more interested in teams being able to fill out reserve teams first and work from there on down over time.
Working with Youth Academies, like Racing Louisville, for example might mean little more than the occasional U17 getting to practice with the reserve squad if they are short. Spirit does this occasionally with local clubs. I could see NWSL trying to strengthen those lines of communication for finding players here and there but nothing as formal as league and full on academy as you envision.
"While some NWSL clubs have either reserve teams, such as Racing Louisville’s W League team, or relationships with youth academies, these elements aren’t yet baked into each club’s infrastructure." This sums it up. Teams already do this as they can. Straddling clubs with the required expense of an academy is not something the league is prepared to do just yet.
That's one interpretation. It could mean a lot of things.
However the FACT that the head of the NWSL is talking about engaging with youth says a lot.
Look at how MLS engages with youth and you'll see the most likely way NWSL will engage with youth.
There is no money to do much of anything. At best this is 5 to 10 years out and assumes growth in the Women's professional soccer that is suspect without a dominating national team. You can't look at MLS --- they have the money. It is highly likely that NWSL will not. Look the whole NWSL is not in great shape. They do ok; not great. Some of the owners have deep pockets most do not. MLS is mostly deep pockets.
Don't know what you're talking about women's soccer specifically USWNT and NWSL are booming.
No, it isn't booming. Growing? Yes, but booming? no way.
Yes booming NWSL quadrupled their media contract.
That's what booming looks like.
Average attendance is 15,000 with teams like Chicago only averaging 4800 a game.
Not booming
SD Wave is averaging 20k per game same as many MLS teams.
Booming
And Chicago is under 5000. That's how averages work. High School football games in Texas draw more than SD Wave.
Growing, not booming.
And Houston Dynamo (A MLS Team) averages 15000
https://soccerstadiumdigest.com/2023-mls-attendance/
Booming + proven that several NWSL clubs average higher than MLS attendance.
How many NWSL teams own their own stadiums? Do any own stadiums that even approach MLS stadiums? Owning the building generates revenue, when the wave get a huge number, SDSU benefits as much as the team
MLS implemented a homegrown rule in 2008. How many MLS teams had their own stadium in 2008?
Does that really matter? Unless there is political appetite to subsidize NWSL stadiums, NWSL teams will have an impossible task generating the kind of revenue that MLS teams expect
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jessica Berman (NWSL Commissioner) spoke about Academies again today.
https://theathletic.com/5337948/2024/03/13/jessica-berman-nwsl-calendar-world-cup/
Berman also envisioned teams being willing to invest more in youth talent development because of the opportunity for a financial return even if that player didn’t end up on the first team. While some NWSL clubs have either reserve teams, such as Racing Louisville’s W League team, or relationships with youth academies, these elements aren’t yet baked into each club’s infrastructure.
LOL, she spoke about many things and the word academies wasn't used the way you want to believe. Yeah, read it again, look at the timeline and then ask yourself, this "will my kid ever benefit from whatever hypothetical she even means?"
Everyone here wants a more professional academy system installed but she spoke in very vaguely and in generalities about loose idea of 5 year plan.
If your kid is a 2012, the announcement of such a league may not happen for at least five years. She also never mentioned GA, ECNL or anything.
You are reading into a lot of tea leaves that such an undertaking is happening soon when she also listed many more imminent things on the horizon. Stadiums, network deals, expansion, transfer fees, etc. Your paragraph was pretty much at the end of the article. Your GA academy system is not happening soon. She seemed more interested in teams being able to fill out reserve teams first and work from there on down over time.
Working with Youth Academies, like Racing Louisville, for example might mean little more than the occasional U17 getting to practice with the reserve squad if they are short. Spirit does this occasionally with local clubs. I could see NWSL trying to strengthen those lines of communication for finding players here and there but nothing as formal as league and full on academy as you envision.
"While some NWSL clubs have either reserve teams, such as Racing Louisville’s W League team, or relationships with youth academies, these elements aren’t yet baked into each club’s infrastructure." This sums it up. Teams already do this as they can. Straddling clubs with the required expense of an academy is not something the league is prepared to do just yet.
That's one interpretation. It could mean a lot of things.
However the FACT that the head of the NWSL is talking about engaging with youth says a lot.
Look at how MLS engages with youth and you'll see the most likely way NWSL will engage with youth.
There is no money to do much of anything. At best this is 5 to 10 years out and assumes growth in the Women's professional soccer that is suspect without a dominating national team. You can't look at MLS --- they have the money. It is highly likely that NWSL will not. Look the whole NWSL is not in great shape. They do ok; not great. Some of the owners have deep pockets most do not. MLS is mostly deep pockets.
Don't know what you're talking about women's soccer specifically USWNT and NWSL are booming.
No, it isn't booming. Growing? Yes, but booming? no way.
Yes booming NWSL quadrupled their media contract.
That's what booming looks like.
Average attendance is 15,000 with teams like Chicago only averaging 4800 a game.
Not booming
SD Wave is averaging 20k per game same as many MLS teams.
Booming
And Chicago is under 5000. That's how averages work. High School football games in Texas draw more than SD Wave.
Growing, not booming.
And Houston Dynamo (A MLS Team) averages 15000
https://soccerstadiumdigest.com/2023-mls-attendance/
Booming + proven that several NWSL clubs average higher than MLS attendance.
How many NWSL teams own their own stadiums? Do any own stadiums that even approach MLS stadiums? Owning the building generates revenue, when the wave get a huge number, SDSU benefits as much as the team
MLS implemented a homegrown rule in 2008. How many MLS teams had their own stadium in 2008?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jessica Berman (NWSL Commissioner) spoke about Academies again today.
https://theathletic.com/5337948/2024/03/13/jessica-berman-nwsl-calendar-world-cup/
Berman also envisioned teams being willing to invest more in youth talent development because of the opportunity for a financial return even if that player didn’t end up on the first team. While some NWSL clubs have either reserve teams, such as Racing Louisville’s W League team, or relationships with youth academies, these elements aren’t yet baked into each club’s infrastructure.
LOL, she spoke about many things and the word academies wasn't used the way you want to believe. Yeah, read it again, look at the timeline and then ask yourself, this "will my kid ever benefit from whatever hypothetical she even means?"
Everyone here wants a more professional academy system installed but she spoke in very vaguely and in generalities about loose idea of 5 year plan.
If your kid is a 2012, the announcement of such a league may not happen for at least five years. She also never mentioned GA, ECNL or anything.
You are reading into a lot of tea leaves that such an undertaking is happening soon when she also listed many more imminent things on the horizon. Stadiums, network deals, expansion, transfer fees, etc. Your paragraph was pretty much at the end of the article. Your GA academy system is not happening soon. She seemed more interested in teams being able to fill out reserve teams first and work from there on down over time.
Working with Youth Academies, like Racing Louisville, for example might mean little more than the occasional U17 getting to practice with the reserve squad if they are short. Spirit does this occasionally with local clubs. I could see NWSL trying to strengthen those lines of communication for finding players here and there but nothing as formal as league and full on academy as you envision.
"While some NWSL clubs have either reserve teams, such as Racing Louisville’s W League team, or relationships with youth academies, these elements aren’t yet baked into each club’s infrastructure." This sums it up. Teams already do this as they can. Straddling clubs with the required expense of an academy is not something the league is prepared to do just yet.
That's one interpretation. It could mean a lot of things.
However the FACT that the head of the NWSL is talking about engaging with youth says a lot.
Look at how MLS engages with youth and you'll see the most likely way NWSL will engage with youth.
There is no money to do much of anything. At best this is 5 to 10 years out and assumes growth in the Women's professional soccer that is suspect without a dominating national team. You can't look at MLS --- they have the money. It is highly likely that NWSL will not. Look the whole NWSL is not in great shape. They do ok; not great. Some of the owners have deep pockets most do not. MLS is mostly deep pockets.
Don't know what you're talking about women's soccer specifically USWNT and NWSL are booming.
No, it isn't booming. Growing? Yes, but booming? no way.
Yes booming NWSL quadrupled their media contract.
That's what booming looks like.
Average attendance is 15,000 with teams like Chicago only averaging 4800 a game.
Not booming
SD Wave is averaging 20k per game same as many MLS teams.
Booming
And Chicago is under 5000. That's how averages work. High School football games in Texas draw more than SD Wave.
Growing, not booming.
And Houston Dynamo (A MLS Team) averages 15000
https://soccerstadiumdigest.com/2023-mls-attendance/
Booming + proven that several NWSL clubs average higher than MLS attendance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jessica Berman (NWSL Commissioner) spoke about Academies again today.
https://theathletic.com/5337948/2024/03/13/jessica-berman-nwsl-calendar-world-cup/
Berman also envisioned teams being willing to invest more in youth talent development because of the opportunity for a financial return even if that player didn’t end up on the first team. While some NWSL clubs have either reserve teams, such as Racing Louisville’s W League team, or relationships with youth academies, these elements aren’t yet baked into each club’s infrastructure.
LOL, she spoke about many things and the word academies wasn't used the way you want to believe. Yeah, read it again, look at the timeline and then ask yourself, this "will my kid ever benefit from whatever hypothetical she even means?"
Everyone here wants a more professional academy system installed but she spoke in very vaguely and in generalities about loose idea of 5 year plan.
If your kid is a 2012, the announcement of such a league may not happen for at least five years. She also never mentioned GA, ECNL or anything.
You are reading into a lot of tea leaves that such an undertaking is happening soon when she also listed many more imminent things on the horizon. Stadiums, network deals, expansion, transfer fees, etc. Your paragraph was pretty much at the end of the article. Your GA academy system is not happening soon. She seemed more interested in teams being able to fill out reserve teams first and work from there on down over time.
Working with Youth Academies, like Racing Louisville, for example might mean little more than the occasional U17 getting to practice with the reserve squad if they are short. Spirit does this occasionally with local clubs. I could see NWSL trying to strengthen those lines of communication for finding players here and there but nothing as formal as league and full on academy as you envision.
"While some NWSL clubs have either reserve teams, such as Racing Louisville’s W League team, or relationships with youth academies, these elements aren’t yet baked into each club’s infrastructure." This sums it up. Teams already do this as they can. Straddling clubs with the required expense of an academy is not something the league is prepared to do just yet.
That's one interpretation. It could mean a lot of things.
However the FACT that the head of the NWSL is talking about engaging with youth says a lot.
Look at how MLS engages with youth and you'll see the most likely way NWSL will engage with youth.
There is no money to do much of anything. At best this is 5 to 10 years out and assumes growth in the Women's professional soccer that is suspect without a dominating national team. You can't look at MLS --- they have the money. It is highly likely that NWSL will not. Look the whole NWSL is not in great shape. They do ok; not great. Some of the owners have deep pockets most do not. MLS is mostly deep pockets.
Don't know what you're talking about women's soccer specifically USWNT and NWSL are booming.
No, it isn't booming. Growing? Yes, but booming? no way.
Yes booming NWSL quadrupled their media contract.
That's what booming looks like.
Average attendance is 15,000 with teams like Chicago only averaging 4800 a game.
Not booming
SD Wave is averaging 20k per game same as many MLS teams.
Booming
And Chicago is under 5000. That's how averages work. High School football games in Texas draw more than SD Wave.
Growing, not booming.
And Houston Dynamo (A MLS Team) averages 15000
https://soccerstadiumdigest.com/2023-mls-attendance/
Booming + proven that several NWSL clubs average higher than MLS attendance.
How many NWSL teams own their own stadiums? Do any own stadiums that even approach MLS stadiums? Owning the building generates revenue, when the wave get a huge number, SDSU benefits as much as the team
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I admit.
I wish more people were like you.
It's interesting how women have to deal with knuckleheads saying that they're not successful.
Look at the attendances of both MLS and NWSL teams. Yes, men are slightly higher but not a lot. Specifically not enough to justify the disparity in pay between men and women player pay.
Just wait, the next NWSL media deal is going to be double what it is now. Which will trickle down to player pay.
Anonymous wrote:Everyone stop with the fantasies. There is no money. There will be no money. Not on the girls side. It has no permanent base. Girls love the product and then they move on. The base is an ever shifting group of temporary fans.
MLS has the Lantino market as its base. It is not going anywhere. MLS is solid with great cash flow.
Cash flow does not cover expenses for most NWSL clubs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jessica Berman (NWSL Commissioner) spoke about Academies again today.
https://theathletic.com/5337948/2024/03/13/jessica-berman-nwsl-calendar-world-cup/
Berman also envisioned teams being willing to invest more in youth talent development because of the opportunity for a financial return even if that player didn’t end up on the first team. While some NWSL clubs have either reserve teams, such as Racing Louisville’s W League team, or relationships with youth academies, these elements aren’t yet baked into each club’s infrastructure.
LOL, she spoke about many things and the word academies wasn't used the way you want to believe. Yeah, read it again, look at the timeline and then ask yourself, this "will my kid ever benefit from whatever hypothetical she even means?"
Everyone here wants a more professional academy system installed but she spoke in very vaguely and in generalities about loose idea of 5 year plan.
If your kid is a 2012, the announcement of such a league may not happen for at least five years. She also never mentioned GA, ECNL or anything.
You are reading into a lot of tea leaves that such an undertaking is happening soon when she also listed many more imminent things on the horizon. Stadiums, network deals, expansion, transfer fees, etc. Your paragraph was pretty much at the end of the article. Your GA academy system is not happening soon. She seemed more interested in teams being able to fill out reserve teams first and work from there on down over time.
Working with Youth Academies, like Racing Louisville, for example might mean little more than the occasional U17 getting to practice with the reserve squad if they are short. Spirit does this occasionally with local clubs. I could see NWSL trying to strengthen those lines of communication for finding players here and there but nothing as formal as league and full on academy as you envision.
"While some NWSL clubs have either reserve teams, such as Racing Louisville’s W League team, or relationships with youth academies, these elements aren’t yet baked into each club’s infrastructure." This sums it up. Teams already do this as they can. Straddling clubs with the required expense of an academy is not something the league is prepared to do just yet.
That's one interpretation. It could mean a lot of things.
However the FACT that the head of the NWSL is talking about engaging with youth says a lot.
Look at how MLS engages with youth and you'll see the most likely way NWSL will engage with youth.
There is no money to do much of anything. At best this is 5 to 10 years out and assumes growth in the Women's professional soccer that is suspect without a dominating national team. You can't look at MLS --- they have the money. It is highly likely that NWSL will not. Look the whole NWSL is not in great shape. They do ok; not great. Some of the owners have deep pockets most do not. MLS is mostly deep pockets.
Don't know what you're talking about women's soccer specifically USWNT and NWSL are booming.
No, it isn't booming. Growing? Yes, but booming? no way.
Yes booming NWSL quadrupled their media contract.
That's what booming looks like.
Average attendance is 15,000 with teams like Chicago only averaging 4800 a game.
Not booming
SD Wave is averaging 20k per game same as many MLS teams.
Booming
And Chicago is under 5000. That's how averages work. High School football games in Texas draw more than SD Wave.
Growing, not booming.
And Houston Dynamo (A MLS Team) averages 15000
https://soccerstadiumdigest.com/2023-mls-attendance/
Booming + proven that several NWSL clubs average higher than MLS attendance.
Anonymous wrote:I admit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jessica Berman (NWSL Commissioner) spoke about Academies again today.
https://theathletic.com/5337948/2024/03/13/jessica-berman-nwsl-calendar-world-cup/
Berman also envisioned teams being willing to invest more in youth talent development because of the opportunity for a financial return even if that player didn’t end up on the first team. While some NWSL clubs have either reserve teams, such as Racing Louisville’s W League team, or relationships with youth academies, these elements aren’t yet baked into each club’s infrastructure.
LOL, she spoke about many things and the word academies wasn't used the way you want to believe. Yeah, read it again, look at the timeline and then ask yourself, this "will my kid ever benefit from whatever hypothetical she even means?"
Everyone here wants a more professional academy system installed but she spoke in very vaguely and in generalities about loose idea of 5 year plan.
If your kid is a 2012, the announcement of such a league may not happen for at least five years. She also never mentioned GA, ECNL or anything.
You are reading into a lot of tea leaves that such an undertaking is happening soon when she also listed many more imminent things on the horizon. Stadiums, network deals, expansion, transfer fees, etc. Your paragraph was pretty much at the end of the article. Your GA academy system is not happening soon. She seemed more interested in teams being able to fill out reserve teams first and work from there on down over time.
Working with Youth Academies, like Racing Louisville, for example might mean little more than the occasional U17 getting to practice with the reserve squad if they are short. Spirit does this occasionally with local clubs. I could see NWSL trying to strengthen those lines of communication for finding players here and there but nothing as formal as league and full on academy as you envision.
"While some NWSL clubs have either reserve teams, such as Racing Louisville’s W League team, or relationships with youth academies, these elements aren’t yet baked into each club’s infrastructure." This sums it up. Teams already do this as they can. Straddling clubs with the required expense of an academy is not something the league is prepared to do just yet.
That's one interpretation. It could mean a lot of things.
However the FACT that the head of the NWSL is talking about engaging with youth says a lot.
Look at how MLS engages with youth and you'll see the most likely way NWSL will engage with youth.
There is no money to do much of anything. At best this is 5 to 10 years out and assumes growth in the Women's professional soccer that is suspect without a dominating national team. You can't look at MLS --- they have the money. It is highly likely that NWSL will not. Look the whole NWSL is not in great shape. They do ok; not great. Some of the owners have deep pockets most do not. MLS is mostly deep pockets.
Don't know what you're talking about women's soccer specifically USWNT and NWSL are booming.
No, it isn't booming. Growing? Yes, but booming? no way.
Yes booming NWSL quadrupled their media contract.
That's what booming looks like.
Average attendance is 15,000 with teams like Chicago only averaging 4800 a game.
Not booming
SD Wave is averaging 20k per game same as many MLS teams.
Booming
And Chicago is under 5000. That's how averages work. High School football games in Texas draw more than SD Wave.
Growing, not booming.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jessica Berman (NWSL Commissioner) spoke about Academies again today.
https://theathletic.com/5337948/2024/03/13/jessica-berman-nwsl-calendar-world-cup/
Berman also envisioned teams being willing to invest more in youth talent development because of the opportunity for a financial return even if that player didn’t end up on the first team. While some NWSL clubs have either reserve teams, such as Racing Louisville’s W League team, or relationships with youth academies, these elements aren’t yet baked into each club’s infrastructure.
LOL, she spoke about many things and the word academies wasn't used the way you want to believe. Yeah, read it again, look at the timeline and then ask yourself, this "will my kid ever benefit from whatever hypothetical she even means?"
Everyone here wants a more professional academy system installed but she spoke in very vaguely and in generalities about loose idea of 5 year plan.
If your kid is a 2012, the announcement of such a league may not happen for at least five years. She also never mentioned GA, ECNL or anything.
You are reading into a lot of tea leaves that such an undertaking is happening soon when she also listed many more imminent things on the horizon. Stadiums, network deals, expansion, transfer fees, etc. Your paragraph was pretty much at the end of the article. Your GA academy system is not happening soon. She seemed more interested in teams being able to fill out reserve teams first and work from there on down over time.
Working with Youth Academies, like Racing Louisville, for example might mean little more than the occasional U17 getting to practice with the reserve squad if they are short. Spirit does this occasionally with local clubs. I could see NWSL trying to strengthen those lines of communication for finding players here and there but nothing as formal as league and full on academy as you envision.
"While some NWSL clubs have either reserve teams, such as Racing Louisville’s W League team, or relationships with youth academies, these elements aren’t yet baked into each club’s infrastructure." This sums it up. Teams already do this as they can. Straddling clubs with the required expense of an academy is not something the league is prepared to do just yet.
That's one interpretation. It could mean a lot of things.
However the FACT that the head of the NWSL is talking about engaging with youth says a lot.
Look at how MLS engages with youth and you'll see the most likely way NWSL will engage with youth.
There is no money to do much of anything. At best this is 5 to 10 years out and assumes growth in the Women's professional soccer that is suspect without a dominating national team. You can't look at MLS --- they have the money. It is highly likely that NWSL will not. Look the whole NWSL is not in great shape. They do ok; not great. Some of the owners have deep pockets most do not. MLS is mostly deep pockets.
Don't know what you're talking about women's soccer specifically USWNT and NWSL are booming.
No, it isn't booming. Growing? Yes, but booming? no way.
Yes booming NWSL quadrupled their media contract.
That's what booming looks like.
Average attendance is 15,000 with teams like Chicago only averaging 4800 a game.
Not booming
SD Wave is averaging 20k per game same as many MLS teams.
Booming