Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Unfortunately I agree. She needed to be out there for the last year + making this case. The republicans let Trump control the narrative after Jan. 6 so now they all believe the "stolen election," "everything was great when Trump was president," "Trump was very competent" BS. It took years of propaganda from the whole republican propaganda machine to bake that in. It's not getting reversed in a couple weeks based on the statements of one person.
There was a highly respected Republican woman out there making that exact case - Liz Cheney. And look how far her influence carried.
Haley can't beat Trump. People have hope because Nikki Haley, highly competent and highly qualified, with a successful record as governor of a conservative state, not to mention she's not a doddering old man, should be a solid candidate against a doddering old fool like Trump. In any sane time she would be. But we are not in a sane time and facts don't matter. Trump is the nominee. Haley may be around to pick up the pieces later, but I wouldn't count on it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Unfortunately I agree. She needed to be out there for the last year + making this case. The republicans let Trump control the narrative after Jan. 6 so now they all believe the "stolen election," "everything was great when Trump was president," "Trump was very competent" BS. It took years of propaganda from the whole republican propaganda machine to bake that in. It's not getting reversed in a couple weeks based on the statements of one person.
There was a highly respected Republican woman out there making that exact case - Liz Cheney. And look how far her influence carried.
Haley can't beat Trump. People have hope because Nikki Haley, highly competent and highly qualified, with a successful record as governor of a conservative state, not to mention she's not a doddering old man, should be a solid candidate against a doddering old fool like Trump. In any sane time she would be. But we are not in a sane time and facts don't matter. Trump is the nominee. Haley may be around to pick up the pieces later, but I wouldn't count on it.
Anonymous wrote:
Unfortunately I agree. She needed to be out there for the last year + making this case. The republicans let Trump control the narrative after Jan. 6 so now they all believe the "stolen election," "everything was great when Trump was president," "Trump was very competent" BS. It took years of propaganda from the whole republican propaganda machine to bake that in. It's not getting reversed in a couple weeks based on the statements of one person.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:RNC draft resolution to declare Trump party's nominee pulled, hours after it's introduced
https://www.axios.com/2024/01/26/rnc-trump-nominee-resolution?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=editorial
Of course! Why would America even consider nominating fit, well qualified candidates in their political prime years of their 50s and 60s when we can have a choice between the two most amazing elderly people to ever seek the POTUS position?
Anonymous wrote:RNC draft resolution to declare Trump party's nominee pulled, hours after it's introduced
https://www.axios.com/2024/01/26/rnc-trump-nominee-resolution?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=editorial
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:if she was such a birdbrain, why did he hire her for UN Ambassador?
He's got a terrible track record of hiring people who he later determines to be horrible, incompetent, birdbrain, etc. Why is he so bad at hiring???
Can any Republicans answer this question?