Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who cares if they are DC based?! DMV girls play there so it should be discussed.
Not sure why there are people who care so much about talking about "Baltimore" clubs here! Every parent with a strong player has at one point considered the drive, therefore it is clearly noteworthy here on this forum.
Is the answer no, there are no local 2028 teams that are highly ranked?
Anonymous wrote:Who cares if they are DC based?! DMV girls play there so it should be discussed.
Not sure why there are people who care so much about talking about "Baltimore" clubs here! Every parent with a strong player has at one point considered the drive, therefore it is clearly noteworthy here on this forum.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The funny thing is, this year isn’t even good compared to where the other teams were when they were at this age?!?! (25’s 26’s and 27’s). It’s pure comedy!
How is 2028 weaker than the other years?
2028s don't have any local teams with strong national rankings, other than Hero's Green which is strong at every year. Both the BLC and MCE 28s are notably bad.
It’s the elephant in the room that no one wants to talk about
What? That the poster who thinks Hero’s is a local team is probably not very knowledgeable about 2028 lacrosse?
It is within 25 miles of DC and about 25% of it’s roster is from MoCo. Sounds pretty local to me.
So what other local teams are highly ranked for the 2028s then?
By these standards, other good local teams would include M&D and Coppermine, which also have DMV players. Local 2028 lacrosse is actually extremely good when you expand the map beyond what most people would consider local.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The funny thing is, this year isn’t even good compared to where the other teams were when they were at this age?!?! (25’s 26’s and 27’s). It’s pure comedy!
How is 2028 weaker than the other years?
2028s don't have any local teams with strong national rankings, other than Hero's Green which is strong at every year. Both the BLC and MCE 28s are notably bad.
It’s the elephant in the room that no one wants to talk about
What? That the poster who thinks Hero’s is a local team is probably not very knowledgeable about 2028 lacrosse?
It is within 25 miles of DC and about 25% of it’s roster is from MoCo. Sounds pretty local to me.
So what other local teams are highly ranked for the 2028s then?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The funny thing is, this year isn’t even good compared to where the other teams were when they were at this age?!?! (25’s 26’s and 27’s). It’s pure comedy!
How is 2028 weaker than the other years?
2028s don't have any local teams with strong national rankings, other than Hero's Green which is strong at every year. Both the BLC and MCE 28s are notably bad.
It’s the elephant in the room that no one wants to talk about
What? That the poster who thinks Hero’s is a local team is probably not very knowledgeable about 2028 lacrosse?
It is within 25 miles of DC and about 25% of it’s roster is from MoCo. Sounds pretty local to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The funny thing is, this year isn’t even good compared to where the other teams were when they were at this age?!?! (25’s 26’s and 27’s). It’s pure comedy!
How is 2028 weaker than the other years?
2028s don't have any local teams with strong national rankings, other than Hero's Green which is strong at every year. Both the BLC and MCE 28s are notably bad.
It’s the elephant in the room that no one wants to talk about
What? That the poster who thinks Hero’s is a local team is probably not very knowledgeable about 2028 lacrosse?
It is within 25 miles of DC and about 25% of it’s roster is from MoCo. Sounds pretty local to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The funny thing is, this year isn’t even good compared to where the other teams were when they were at this age?!?! (25’s 26’s and 27’s). It’s pure comedy!
How is 2028 weaker than the other years?
2028s don't have any local teams with strong national rankings, other than Hero's Green which is strong at every year. Both the BLC and MCE 28s are notably bad.
It’s the elephant in the room that no one wants to talk about
What? That the poster who thinks Hero’s is a local team is probably not very knowledgeable about 2028 lacrosse?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The funny thing is, this year isn’t even good compared to where the other teams were when they were at this age?!?! (25’s 26’s and 27’s). It’s pure comedy!
How is 2028 weaker than the other years?
2028s don't have any local teams with strong national rankings, other than Hero's Green which is strong at every year. Both the BLC and MCE 28s are notably bad.
It’s the elephant in the room that no one wants to talk about
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The funny thing is, this year isn’t even good compared to where the other teams were when they were at this age?!?! (25’s 26’s and 27’s). It’s pure comedy!
How is 2028 weaker than the other years?
2028s don't have any local teams with strong national rankings, other than Hero's Green which is strong at every year. Both the BLC and MCE 28s are notably bad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The funny thing is, this year isn’t even good compared to where the other teams were when they were at this age?!?! (25’s 26’s and 27’s). It’s pure comedy!
How is 2028 weaker than the other years?