Anonymous wrote:
This is incorrect. Conservatives are pretty good at governing. The problem is when loons drive out actual conservatives. There aren't that many actual conservatives left around.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/catherine-glenn-foster-abortion-eric-swalwell-b2123411.html
The president of an anti-abortion legal advocacy group told a House committee this week that abortion care for a 10-year-old girl would not be considered an abortion.
If this doesn't prove that forced birthers are about punishing women for having sex, I don't know what is.
-former religious "pro-life" person who knows it's about punishing women for having sex.
Forced birthers are stuck, now. Theyve been saying no abortions because the fetus and embryo are people with equal rights to life.
But they know they can’t deny a raped 10 year old an abortion. That is politically unpalatable.
So they have to say if the pregnancy will affect the health of the mother, ending it isn’t an abortion. It is justified, therefore it is not an abortion. Because abortions are only when you end a pregnancy for no good reason.
This line of reasoning will not, however, get them where they think it will get them… but they aren’t smart enough to see the flaws in this argument.
Like most conservatives, they are crap on the details of governing, and legislation.
This is incorrect. Conservatives are pretty good at governing. The problem is when loons drive out actual conservatives. There aren't that many actual conservatives left around.
“Conservatives” want to destroy government except when it serves the goal of owning the libs. They have sucked at governing since Reagan. Cutting taxes to cut government programs — but not the military — and endless wars isn’t “good at governing.”
There are 50 states, many of them have local or state governments that are governed by conservatives. The world is larger than Congress.
FYI, owning the libs is a loon goal, not a conservative one.
Anonymous wrote:
“TPRs.” Lord, the horrifying combination of Office Space and The Handmaid’s Tale in which we now live.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This is not surprising or anything to freak out about. The vast majority of states collect and report abortion data and have for decades. Only a handful don’t. As things are currently doesn’t mean that the individual who terminated is identified (I wouldn’t be surprised if that changes in the coming years, of course, the way things are going.) What is typically reported is the facility, patient demographics like age and marital status, gestational age, and the procedure used. This is where we get abortion statistics from.
He is trying to pull identifying data from the reports.
I’m not saying what he’s doing is right, but a PP said “so anyone who terminated would be public knowledge?” And no, that is not true. He’s saying no abortion on a 10 year old patient was reported. Demographic info like age is required to report just like it is in all but a handful of states. So either it never happened, or the doctor failed to report it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/catherine-glenn-foster-abortion-eric-swalwell-b2123411.html
The president of an anti-abortion legal advocacy group told a House committee this week that abortion care for a 10-year-old girl would not be considered an abortion.
If this doesn't prove that forced birthers are about punishing women for having sex, I don't know what is.
-former religious "pro-life" person who knows it's about punishing women for having sex.
Forced birthers are stuck, now. Theyve been saying no abortions because the fetus and embryo are people with equal rights to life.
But they know they can’t deny a raped 10 year old an abortion. That is politically unpalatable.
So they have to say if the pregnancy will affect the health of the mother, ending it isn’t an abortion. It is justified, therefore it is not an abortion. Because abortions are only when you end a pregnancy for no good reason.
This line of reasoning will not, however, get them where they think it will get them… but they aren’t smart enough to see the flaws in this argument.
Like most conservatives, they are crap on the details of governing, and legislation.
This is incorrect. Conservatives are pretty good at governing. The problem is when loons drive out actual conservatives. There aren't that many actual conservatives left around.
“Conservatives” want to destroy government except when it serves the goal of owning the libs. They have sucked at governing since Reagan. Cutting taxes to cut government programs — but not the military — and endless wars isn’t “good at governing.”
There are 50 states, many of them have local or state governments that are governed by conservatives. The world is larger than Congress.
FYI, owning the libs is a loon goal, not a conservative one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/catherine-glenn-foster-abortion-eric-swalwell-b2123411.html
The president of an anti-abortion legal advocacy group told a House committee this week that abortion care for a 10-year-old girl would not be considered an abortion.
If this doesn't prove that forced birthers are about punishing women for having sex, I don't know what is.
-former religious "pro-life" person who knows it's about punishing women for having sex.
Forced birthers are stuck, now. Theyve been saying no abortions because the fetus and embryo are people with equal rights to life.
But they know they can’t deny a raped 10 year old an abortion. That is politically unpalatable.
So they have to say if the pregnancy will affect the health of the mother, ending it isn’t an abortion. It is justified, therefore it is not an abortion. Because abortions are only when you end a pregnancy for no good reason.
This line of reasoning will not, however, get them where they think it will get them… but they aren’t smart enough to see the flaws in this argument.
Like most conservatives, they are crap on the details of governing, and legislation.
If Republicans truly believe that life begins at the instant of conception, how can they also argue that a child conceived via rape is worth less than a child conceived via consensual sex (which they are now doing apparently)?
They don’t feel limited by facts or reason.
They will make up whatever random laws they want to penalize whom ever they want. Just because they feel like it. No rational arguments. No informed opinions.
Ignorant, irrational tyranny.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/catherine-glenn-foster-abortion-eric-swalwell-b2123411.html
The president of an anti-abortion legal advocacy group told a House committee this week that abortion care for a 10-year-old girl would not be considered an abortion.
If this doesn't prove that forced birthers are about punishing women for having sex, I don't know what is.
-former religious "pro-life" person who knows it's about punishing women for having sex.
Forced birthers are stuck, now. Theyve been saying no abortions because the fetus and embryo are people with equal rights to life.
But they know they can’t deny a raped 10 year old an abortion. That is politically unpalatable.
So they have to say if the pregnancy will affect the health of the mother, ending it isn’t an abortion. It is justified, therefore it is not an abortion. Because abortions are only when you end a pregnancy for no good reason.
This line of reasoning will not, however, get them where they think it will get them… but they aren’t smart enough to see the flaws in this argument.
Like most conservatives, they are crap on the details of governing, and legislation.
If Republicans truly believe that life begins at the instant of conception, how can they also argue that a child conceived via rape is worth less than a child conceived via consensual sex (which they are now doing apparently)?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This is not surprising or anything to freak out about. The vast majority of states collect and report abortion data and have for decades. Only a handful don’t. As things are currently doesn’t mean that the individual who terminated is identified (I wouldn’t be surprised if that changes in the coming years, of course, the way things are going.) What is typically reported is the facility, patient demographics like age and marital status, gestational age, and the procedure used. This is where we get abortion statistics from.
He is trying to pull identifying data from the reports.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/catherine-glenn-foster-abortion-eric-swalwell-b2123411.html
The president of an anti-abortion legal advocacy group told a House committee this week that abortion care for a 10-year-old girl would not be considered an abortion.
If this doesn't prove that forced birthers are about punishing women for having sex, I don't know what is.
-former religious "pro-life" person who knows it's about punishing women for having sex.
Forced birthers are stuck, now. Theyve been saying no abortions because the fetus and embryo are people with equal rights to life.
But they know they can’t deny a raped 10 year old an abortion. That is politically unpalatable.
So they have to say if the pregnancy will affect the health of the mother, ending it isn’t an abortion. It is justified, therefore it is not an abortion. Because abortions are only when you end a pregnancy for no good reason.
This line of reasoning will not, however, get them where they think it will get them… but they aren’t smart enough to see the flaws in this argument.
Like most conservatives, they are crap on the details of governing, and legislation.
This is incorrect. Conservatives are pretty good at governing. The problem is when loons drive out actual conservatives. There aren't that many actual conservatives left around.
“Conservatives” want to destroy government except when it serves the goal of owning the libs. They have sucked at governing since Reagan. Cutting taxes to cut government programs — but not the military — and endless wars isn’t “good at governing.”
Anonymous wrote:
This is not surprising or anything to freak out about. The vast majority of states collect and report abortion data and have for decades. Only a handful don’t. As things are currently doesn’t mean that the individual who terminated is identified (I wouldn’t be surprised if that changes in the coming years, of course, the way things are going.) What is typically reported is the facility, patient demographics like age and marital status, gestational age, and the procedure used. This is where we get abortion statistics from.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/catherine-glenn-foster-abortion-eric-swalwell-b2123411.html
The president of an anti-abortion legal advocacy group told a House committee this week that abortion care for a 10-year-old girl would not be considered an abortion.
If this doesn't prove that forced birthers are about punishing women for having sex, I don't know what is.
-former religious "pro-life" person who knows it's about punishing women for having sex.
Forced birthers are stuck, now. Theyve been saying no abortions because the fetus and embryo are people with equal rights to life.
But they know they can’t deny a raped 10 year old an abortion. That is politically unpalatable.
So they have to say if the pregnancy will affect the health of the mother, ending it isn’t an abortion. It is justified, therefore it is not an abortion. Because abortions are only when you end a pregnancy for no good reason.
This line of reasoning will not, however, get them where they think it will get them… but they aren’t smart enough to see the flaws in this argument.
Like most conservatives, they are crap on the details of governing, and legislation.
This is incorrect. Conservatives are pretty good at governing. The problem is when loons drive out actual conservatives. There aren't that many actual conservatives left around.
“Conservatives” want to destroy government except when it serves the goal of owning the libs. They have sucked at governing since Reagan. Cutting taxes to cut government programs — but not the military — and endless wars isn’t “good at governing.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/catherine-glenn-foster-abortion-eric-swalwell-b2123411.html
The president of an anti-abortion legal advocacy group told a House committee this week that abortion care for a 10-year-old girl would not be considered an abortion.
If this doesn't prove that forced birthers are about punishing women for having sex, I don't know what is.
-former religious "pro-life" person who knows it's about punishing women for having sex.
Forced birthers are stuck, now. Theyve been saying no abortions because the fetus and embryo are people with equal rights to life.
But they know they can’t deny a raped 10 year old an abortion. That is politically unpalatable.
So they have to say if the pregnancy will affect the health of the mother, ending it isn’t an abortion. It is justified, therefore it is not an abortion. Because abortions are only when you end a pregnancy for no good reason.
This line of reasoning will not, however, get them where they think it will get them… but they aren’t smart enough to see the flaws in this argument.
Like most conservatives, they are crap on the details of governing, and legislation.
This is incorrect. Conservatives are pretty good at governing. The problem is when loons drive out actual conservatives. There aren't that many actual conservatives left around.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/catherine-glenn-foster-abortion-eric-swalwell-b2123411.html
The president of an anti-abortion legal advocacy group told a House committee this week that abortion care for a 10-year-old girl would not be considered an abortion.
If this doesn't prove that forced birthers are about punishing women for having sex, I don't know what is.
-former religious "pro-life" person who knows it's about punishing women for having sex.
Forced birthers are stuck, now. Theyve been saying no abortions because the fetus and embryo are people with equal rights to life.
But they know they can’t deny a raped 10 year old an abortion. That is politically unpalatable.
So they have to say if the pregnancy will affect the health of the mother, ending it isn’t an abortion. It is justified, therefore it is not an abortion. Because abortions are only when you end a pregnancy for no good reason.
This line of reasoning will not, however, get them where they think it will get them… but they aren’t smart enough to see the flaws in this argument.
Like most conservatives, they are crap on the details of governing, and legislation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/catherine-glenn-foster-abortion-eric-swalwell-b2123411.html
The president of an anti-abortion legal advocacy group told a House committee this week that abortion care for a 10-year-old girl would not be considered an abortion.
If this doesn't prove that forced birthers are about punishing women for having sex, I don't know what is.
-former religious "pro-life" person who knows it's about punishing women for having sex.
Forced birthers are stuck, now. Theyve been saying no abortions because the fetus and embryo are people with equal rights to life.
But they know they can’t deny a raped 10 year old an abortion. That is politically unpalatable.
So they have to say if the pregnancy will affect the health of the mother, ending it isn’t an abortion. It is justified, therefore it is not an abortion. Because abortions are only when you end a pregnancy for no good reason.
This line of reasoning will not, however, get them where they think it will get them… but they aren’t smart enough to see the flaws in this argument.
Like most conservatives, they are crap on the details of governing, and legislation.