Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He’s Trump’s Sarah Palin.

And the Sarah Palin of Dan Quayles. Neither of who enjoyed a negative favorability rating at this point in the case.

The TRUMP TEAM says they know there is more out there.

This should be both good and deeply sad for this country.

Do you mean the Trump Team knows there’s more dirt out there on him? Cite?

Oh, no. I mean -- oh, no. There's MORE?

NP: of course there is. That’s precisely why Trump picked him. Trump loves blackmail material. Trump tried to blackmail Bezos with the sexts to Lauren Sanchez.

The GOP operates a blackmail racket to to keep the foot soldiers in line. JD Vance is no different

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He’s Trump’s Sarah Palin.

And the Sarah Palin of Dan Quayles. Neither of who enjoyed a negative favorability rating at this point in the case.

The TRUMP TEAM says they know there is more out there.

This should be both good and deeply sad for this country.

Do you mean the Trump Team knows there’s more dirt out there on him? Cite?

Oh, no. I mean -- oh, no. There's MORE?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He’s Trump’s Sarah Palin.

And the Sarah Palin of Dan Quayles. Neither of who enjoyed a negative favorability rating at this point in the case.

The TRUMP TEAM says they know there is more out there.

This should be both good and deeply sad for this country.

Do you mean the Trump Team knows there’s more dirt out there on him? Cite?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He’s Trump’s Sarah Palin.

And the Sarah Palin of Dan Quayles. Neither of who enjoyed a negative favorability rating at this point in the case.

The TRUMP TEAM says they know there is more out there.

This should be both good and deeply sad for this country.

Anonymous wrote:He’s Trump’s Sarah Palin.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:After reading today's WaPo article about his texts with his former friend from law school who is trans, I feel even worse for Usha. Apparently this is not the guy she married, but now she has three young kids with him and probably still loves him. I noticed the part where he was texting that she was worried she wouldn't get a S Ct clerkship offer because she's so apolitical and didn't have any idelogical strings. Poor thing just wanted to be a super rich IP lawyer or maybe transition into a nice spot in academia at YLS or HLS or a judicial appointment on the Fed Circuit eventually .... and here she is at the center of the culture wars. I wonder if they are having "discussions" about whether the oldest kid is preparing for First Communion.

Elite law school students don't always pair and marry for love, especially not the politics-bound.

You’re really wrong. I went to YLS and my spouse went to HlS and I know lots and lots of elite law school students including Supreme Court clerks. I don’t know anyone that didn’t marry for love. Of course some of us made bad decisions regardless and intellectual accomplishments are sometimes part of love. But no one is marrying for the political/professional connections. And if you went to YlS, you don’t need to. It’s people who didn’t go to elite schools that need to marry for the connections.

If you think some people at these schools aren't bearing this in mind, you're wrong. If you think Obama didn't factor that Michelle would help his appeal and presidential aspirations, you're wrong.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Just between Mao and Stalin, the communist party killed at least 50 million people. I don't know why it is funny to wear a CCP symbol. It is like wearing a Nazi symbol, which Prince Harry got his ass kicked for it.

Vance does a lot of weird things that normal people wouldnt' do.

Take a seat on that sofa over there and we can start listing some of them...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:After reading today's WaPo article about his texts with his former friend from law school who is trans, I feel even worse for Usha. Apparently this is not the guy she married, but now she has three young kids with him and probably still loves him. I noticed the part where he was texting that she was worried she wouldn't get a S Ct clerkship offer because she's so apolitical and didn't have any idelogical strings. Poor thing just wanted to be a super rich IP lawyer or maybe transition into a nice spot in academia at YLS or HLS or a judicial appointment on the Fed Circuit eventually .... and here she is at the center of the culture wars. I wonder if they are having "discussions" about whether the oldest kid is preparing for First Communion.

Elite law school students don't always pair and marry for love, especially not the politics-bound.

You’re really wrong. I went to YLS and my spouse went to HlS and I know lots and lots of elite law school students including Supreme Court clerks. I don’t know anyone that didn’t marry for love. Of course some of us made bad decisions regardless and intellectual accomplishments are sometimes part of love. But no one is marrying for the political/professional connections. And if you went to YlS, you don’t need to. It’s people who didn’t go to elite schools that need to marry for the connections.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:After reading today's WaPo article about his texts with his former friend from law school who is trans, I feel even worse for Usha. Apparently this is not the guy she married, but now she has three young kids with him and probably still loves him. I noticed the part where he was texting that she was worried she wouldn't get a S Ct clerkship offer because she's so apolitical and didn't have any idelogical strings. Poor thing just wanted to be a super rich IP lawyer or maybe transition into a nice spot in academia at YLS or HLS or a judicial appointment on the Fed Circuit eventually .... and here she is at the center of the culture wars. I wonder if they are having "discussions" about whether the oldest kid is preparing for First Communion.

Elite law school students don't always pair and marry for love, especially not the politics-bound.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I feel like I can’t tell what’s AI and what’s real. This looks real (the guy in the macho man randy savage get up is pitch perfect, for example) but is it?

If it is it’s going to be everywhere shortly, I would expect.

This is the full photo. It might not be hard to have everybody IDed.

He allegedly dressed up as a "Communist" for Halloween.

See, this is just one of those weird things where a normal person would say "...uhhhh, why...."

Not only is it a weird "costume," its not even that creative. At least have the ice pick sticking out of your head with some good gore prosthetics and fake blood.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I feel like I can’t tell what’s AI and what’s real. This looks real (the guy in the macho man randy savage get up is pitch perfect, for example) but is it?

If it is it’s going to be everywhere shortly, I would expect.

This is the full photo. It might not be hard to have everybody IDed.

Anonymous wrote:The childless cat lady comment is offensive not only to women without children, but also to those of us who do have children.

Having children was my choice, not my destiny. I adore my children, and I also have other things to offer the world. The relative fruitfulness of my uterus has zero bearing on my worth as a human being. JD suggesting otherwise gives me the absolute creeps.

Yuck.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

What is happening here?

Anonymous wrote: