Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The MU parents on this team have said all along play ups will be at age next year, and should be except maybe one player. Nobody is claiming otherwise. It is not a general lack of talent. They need more quality 06 players.

Please stop bringing your DD up, you don't like when posters disagree with you and then you end up reporting their posts for deletion. This is a public forum not a Metro coaches/family thread.

So you think it's MU parents that are constantly bringing up their DD's? LOL.

Do we have to decide in absolutes? There are some special MU posters and some special Non-MU posters. Some truth to both types of posts. IMHO, worst offenders on the forum are name callers, telling people to get a life, sock puppets, etc. Let the naysayers say what they want, let performance speak. If the play ups are deserved then the public at large would essentially acknowledge its validity and should be able to see that for themselves. There would be recognition across the area from coaches, parents, and other players, that these are non-issues by doing similar things. So what I think we are seeing is something else and because its something else, it's disruptive. Disruptive doesn't necessarily imply wrong, but if messaging to the players and parents is lacking (and very different from other clubs actions), what should we expect?

If the individual's impact to team performance bears out the disruptions need, by all means, disrupt away. But as a club, be prepared to acknowledge and explain when it doesn't. If it's all about showcasing something specific, at least be honest to the players and parents.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The MU parents on this team have said all along play ups will be at age next year, and should be except maybe one player. Nobody is claiming otherwise. It is not a general lack of talent. They need more quality 06 players.

Please stop bringing your DD up, you don't like when posters disagree with you and then you end up reporting their posts for deletion. This is a public forum not a Metro coaches/family thread.

If you are not affiliated with the club and are posting things that are untrue or are nothing more than trolling then they should be reported and taken down.

When opinions are posted as fact without any basis in truth it is worthy of removal regardless of the thread or the club.

It shouldn't matter if you are or are not affiliated. If the post has truth and/or satisfactory opinion based on analysis (even if you disagree) then nothing is wrong with that post other than you don't agree or don't like it. That should not be a cause for deletion.

Well, that is the rub, many of the posts are not truthful and are stated as such.

Attempts at trolling as well as thread hijacking will also be called out in any thread and removed.

Not a MU or FCV parent. Curious soccer parent checking things out for future. I do wonder why I read so many mean things about these two clubs. The anger regarding these two
Clubs is crazy. The one club everyone seems
To hate the TD and the other club people are just wishing it would go away. On that note then why would you care if it is not your kid on that team.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The MU parents on this team have said all along play ups will be at age next year, and should be except maybe one player. Nobody is claiming otherwise. It is not a general lack of talent. They need more quality 06 players.

Please stop bringing your DD up, you don't like when posters disagree with you and then you end up reporting their posts for deletion. This is a public forum not a Metro coaches/family thread.

If you are not affiliated with the club and are posting things that are untrue or are nothing more than trolling then they should be reported and taken down.

When opinions are posted as fact without any basis in truth it is worthy of removal regardless of the thread or the club.

It shouldn't matter if you are or are not affiliated. If the post has truth and/or satisfactory opinion based on analysis (even if you disagree) then nothing is wrong with that post other than you don't agree or don't like it. That should not be a cause for deletion.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The MU parents on this team have said all along play ups will be at age next year, and should be except maybe one player. Nobody is claiming otherwise. It is not a general lack of talent. They need more quality 06 players.

Please stop bringing your DD up, you don't like when posters disagree with you and then you end up reporting their posts for deletion. This is a public forum not a Metro coaches/family thread.

If you are not affiliated with the club and are posting things that are untrue or are nothing more than trolling then they should be reported and taken down.

When opinions are posted as fact without any basis in truth it is worthy of removal regardless of the thread or the club.

But it seems to happen most often with fcv and Mu. How do you know which anonymous posters are affiliated with the club? How do you know who is affiliated with the club?

The MU parents know each other and the teams. It's obvious when posts are made by people who don't know the teams and players. The posts either contain BS that MU parents would not say or have a thinly veiled agenda to throw teams or players under the bus. The posts stick out like a sore thumb. In other words, you are trolling here daily but are not very good at it.

The basic problem is that the forum is anonymous so you're going to get this sort of frivolous posting, especially when there is no moderator.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The MU parents on this team have said all along play ups will be at age next year, and should be except maybe one player. Nobody is claiming otherwise. It is not a general lack of talent. They need more quality 06 players.

Please stop bringing your DD up, you don't like when posters disagree with you and then you end up reporting their posts for deletion. This is a public forum not a Metro coaches/family thread.

If you are not affiliated with the club and are posting things that are untrue or are nothing more than trolling then they should be reported and taken down.

When opinions are posted as fact without any basis in truth it is worthy of removal regardless of the thread or the club.

But it seems to happen most often with fcv and Mu. How do you know which anonymous posters are affiliated with the club? How do you know who is affiliated with the club?

The MU parents know each other and the teams. It's obvious when posts are made by people who don't know the teams and players. The posts either contain BS that MU parents would not say or have a thinly veiled agenda to throw teams or players under the bus. The posts stick out like a sore thumb. In other words, you are trolling here daily but are not very good at it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The MU parents on this team have said all along play ups will be at age next year, and should be except maybe one player. Nobody is claiming otherwise. It is not a general lack of talent. They need more quality 06 players.

Please stop bringing your DD up, you don't like when posters disagree with you and then you end up reporting their posts for deletion. This is a public forum not a Metro coaches/family thread.

If you are not affiliated with the club and are posting things that are untrue or are nothing more than trolling then they should be reported and taken down.

When opinions are posted as fact without any basis in truth it is worthy of removal regardless of the thread or the club.

But it seems to happen most often with fcv and Mu. How do you know which anonymous posters are affiliated with the club? How do you know who is affiliated with the club?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The MU parents on this team have said all along play ups will be at age next year, and should be except maybe one player. Nobody is claiming otherwise. It is not a general lack of talent. They need more quality 06 players.

Please stop bringing your DD up, you don't like when posters disagree with you and then you end up reporting their posts for deletion. This is a public forum not a Metro coaches/family thread.

If you are not affiliated with the club and are posting things that are untrue or are nothing more than trolling then they should be reported and taken down.

When opinions are posted as fact without any basis in truth it is worthy of removal regardless of the thread or the club.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The MU parents on this team have said all along play ups will be at age next year, and should be except maybe one player. Nobody is claiming otherwise. It is not a general lack of talent. They need more quality 06 players.

Please stop bringing your DD up, you don't like when posters disagree with you and then you end up reporting their posts for deletion. This is a public forum not a Metro coaches/family thread.

So you think it's MU parents that are constantly bringing up their DD's? LOL.

Anonymous wrote:
The MU parents on this team have said all along play ups will be at age next year, and should be except maybe one player. Nobody is claiming otherwise. It is not a general lack of talent. They need more quality 06 players.

Please stop bringing your DD up, you don't like when posters disagree with you and then you end up reporting their posts for deletion. This is a public forum not a Metro coaches/family thread.

Anonymous wrote:^^ I love how people predict if a club would become a powerhouse or a mediocre club. These people are neither soccer experts or fortune tellers. LOL.

Due to the constant trolling, these MU threads just become head shakers. It’s obvious to sane folks who have eyes that there are talented players on every MU team. It’s also obvious that several teams are simply in need of several more at age players to complete the team. A merger with BRYC, however unlikely, would do that.

There are one or two people here who need to lay down the axe and focus on their own DD clubs’ issues, because there’s not a club in this area that is without them.

^^ I love how people predict if a club would become a powerhouse or a mediocre club. These people are neither soccer experts or fortune tellers. LOL.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any talk still of Metro and BRYC merging?

Was there talk? That would be the step forward both clubs need. It would create a powerhouse.

It would not create a powerhouse. It would create a mediocre club.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Back to the question, Metro United expects different results after not making any changes?

There is a large market of clubs to choose from. Pick one and live your life.

I'd like to see a viable DA club in Metro United, gives my DD another choice for the future, but it appears from this thread that there is a communication issue at the team level from the coach and HC about trends from past results and future expectations outside of status quo so players & parents understand and aren't surprised. Maybe they are doing that, and kudos to them, but that's not the impression from this thread. Good luck to you in the Spring!

This is a DA question. Are clubs required to field a team at every age? My friend has a DD 2008 at GFR and she is claiming they are going to be doing 2008 DA next year. None of the girls parents want them to "play up". The club has told them they plan to field a 2008 team but may not be able to field a 2007 team. Are you allowed to not have a team at certain age groups? Maybe the few 2007 players can continue to play 2006?

I know the older age groups are required but I'm not sure if the younger ones are. U13 and U14 are not listed in standings so maybe they are "just for kicks" age groups. If this is the case MU would be wise to have a 2008 team and forego the 2007 one if they don't have the talent to support it. If their 2006 team is still 2006/2007 players who are getting killed and they force the 2008 girls to play 2007 than they will have a 2nd team who has yet to score a goal when March of 2011 rolls around. The 2008 GFR group has some talent but not all those girls are DA caliber at the 2008 level and none of them are ready to play DA against teams that have had an additional year of DA training and are at age.

Please define “DA training”

A team that has played in the DA for a year already. Most of the U14 teams will have played DA games for a year already. Is this not true? Do Arlington and FCV currently have U13 DA teams and MU does not have one?

No 2008 team has had "an additional year of DA training" by your own definition.

Not the PP but I think what they were saying is that none of the GFR 08 girls are ready to play against 07 DA teams next year that have already been training together and playing in the DA for a year.

And based on several posts, GFR 08 girls don't want to play 07. They want to play with and against 08s.

Why would they need to? Metro will have no shortage of 07s. More likely it will be tough to just make the 08 team.

I hope so. With the partnerships and time to build, if they have done well with that, you are right. The reason people are asking is because this year, they couldn't field an 07 or an appropriate 06 team. I hope too they have no shortage of 06s so that that team becomes a competitive group that will be tough to just make the 06 team.

Problem is if you have seen the GFR 06 and 07 team play they do not have the talent for DA. The 08 team has the best chance for having a decent team without a million play ups. The 06 MU team is going to need atleast 5 GOOD players when the other move down to their own age group, and with their record and talent why would anyone go to that team?

We would all love to see your superstar DD play on a DA team comprised of only half at age kids, playing against teams fully at age, so we could make snarky remarks about her “talent.” Give it a rest already.

I agree. The situation was untenable from the start. The team never had a chance. But if the 06 players on that team have grown and developed, then just adding more 06s could make that a respectable team.

The play ups on this team really really bother you. LOL.

The PP talked about having a team with only half the players being at age, but I'm having an issue? LOL, ok! You can't have it both ways. Either having half the players at age explains the results and the team needs more at age players, or it's not, and the problem is a general lack of talent, which I don't believe, but to each his own.

The MU parents on this team have said all along play ups will be at age next year, and should be except maybe one player. Nobody is claiming otherwise. It is not a general lack of talent. They need more quality 06 players.

Don't think that will be possible for a merger. Too many moving parts, financial commitments, and politics involved for that to happen