Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:America today in a nutshell. Instead of focusing on how to get better, let's talk about how to change rules (or preserve them), or why this rule is unfair to this group (which means that an alternative would necessarily be unfair to another). The incessant blaming, the relentless whines, the focus on rules instead of improvement, the resentment of others, the parental angling for any advantage, it's all just so f'n repulsive. Can it.
What are you whining about?
They are pretty much calling out the truth. Most folks arguing about the cutoff are not concerned about development as they are about the advantage being slightly older and bigger at younger ages affords their kids.
RAE is real in regards to developing cohorts at early ages that rarely change. It is a sad commentary that kids are given a undeserving advantage and others are equally given a undeserving disadvantage.
The problem truly lies in the arrogance on one side and the feeling of hopelessness on the other side.
Talent in the end should always win out but opportunities are not offered based on talent early on.
When we changed from school to birth year there were lots of Sept kids who got a gut punch when they were now among the smaller kids. Some were talented and hung in their and got better while others were simply exposed as just having been bigger.
Those Jan-March kids were now the bigger and more experienced kids and were now suddenly viewed as better.
Did ANY of the kids change? No, not really just the circumstance and their relative context.