Anonymous wrote:So I'm like a lot of people on here apparently. Moderate basically. I just want someone not too One Fairfax, nor someone GF-obsessed, nor someone Trumpy. So that knocks out all three of these guys. We do need to address over (and under) capacity ASAP, esp. at MHS. But who to vote for? The only thing I can think of is offsetting whoever I vote for in Dranesville with my at-large votes. So vote Karloutsos but then vote for some of the dem at-large. Or the other way (Tholen and some of the GOP at-large). So my point is, I can't talk about Dranesville vote without also talking about at-large. So my question is: what are people's thoughts here on at-large for a moderate like me? Thanks
I just posted on another thread. Dranesville vote comes down to whoever has the personal courage and integrity to:
- tell general Hutchison area people about the new HS
- personal courage to defy the powerful blocs on FCSB and offer amendments for the benefit of the Dranesville District students and taxpayers
- that includes junk on the bond referendum
- inequitable program money
- bond with junk capacity enhancements for trailers that could be solved by boundary changes to permanent existing capacity
- sneak move to hire boundary consultant after this bond on the part of the FCPS school board chair