Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what is stopping Comey from testifying about a ton of crap he couldn't do so about before, as FBI director? I'm assuming he can't reveal classified info, but there may be other elements that aren't classified but that he would have erred on not testifying to as leading the investigation...?
I posted this last night and it got lost in a lot of trolling/arguing/discussion about other elements. Can anyone speak to this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what is stopping Comey from testifying about a ton of crap he couldn't do so about before, as FBI director? I'm assuming he can't reveal classified info, but there may be other elements that aren't classified but that he would have erred on not testifying to as leading the investigation...?
I posted this last night and it got lost in a lot of trolling/arguing/discussion about other elements. Can anyone speak to this?
Anonymous wrote:So what is stopping Comey from testifying about a ton of crap he couldn't do so about before, as FBI director? I'm assuming he can't reveal classified info, but there may be other elements that aren't classified but that he would have erred on not testifying to as leading the investigation...?
Anonymous wrote:Can you tell us what your IQ is first? TIA.Anonymous wrote:I'm thinking of moving my stocks to safe harbor. The Dems are trying to topple the president, and it will send the market plummeting.
Anonymous wrote:I'm thinking of moving my stocks to safe harbor. The Dems are trying to topple the president, and it will send the market plummeting.
Anonymous wrote:I'm thinking of moving my stocks to safe harbor. The Dems are trying to topple the president, and it will send the market plummeting.
Can you tell us what your IQ is first? TIA.Anonymous wrote:I'm thinking of moving my stocks to safe harbor. The Dems are trying to topple the president, and it will send the market plummeting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I didn't read through all 32 pages, [...]
Are you this stupid in real life?
I guess that's the liberal's way of saying you disagree with my theory. (Never miss a chance to insult someone wih a differing opinion!) Would you care to rebut with anything of significance?
And no, IQ in top 5%.
No, you attempted more deflection. Our republic is literally in danger and you turncoats are obsssing over nothing.
And if we're whipping them out, my IQ is in the top 1%.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why wasn't Trump man enough to personally inform his employee of his firing? What a pathetic President.
No balls. No class. Not a real man anyone can respect. A whiny tantumming baby.
No it had to be more calculated than that. He's making an example of Comey. He allowed Flynn to resign, despite the fact that he had lied to the FBI. But Comey is being asked to leave because he's lost the confidence of the American public, but no specific charges of wrongdoing, and he gets publicly fired without any chance to resign and save face?!
Trump's a showman, but even he's not that dumb.
Agreed, he is sending a strong message to prevent something bigger from happening.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I didn't read through all 32 pages, [...]
Are you this stupid in real life?
I guess that's the liberal's way of saying you disagree with my theory. (Never miss a chance to insult someone wih a differing opinion!) Would you care to rebut with anything of significance?
And no, IQ in top 5%.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Comey deserves to be fired. No one who uses lack of "criminal intent" as an excuse to not prosecute deserves to lead the investigative agency of the federal government.
No one who openly admits that the DOJ had acted in a way that betrayed the trust of the people yet did not recommend prosecution should be allowed to stay. He bragged about this in the context of how he navigated the turbulent currents that is Hillary's email investigation.
So people should be prosecuted even if there is not criminal wrongdoing?
Anonymous wrote:Comey deserves to be fired. No one who uses lack of "criminal intent" as an excuse to not prosecute deserves to lead the investigative agency of the federal government.
No one who openly admits that the DOJ had acted in a way that betrayed the trust of the people yet did not recommend prosecution should be allowed to stay. He bragged about this in the context of how he navigated the turbulent currents that is Hillary's email investigation.
Anonymous wrote:![]()