Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Muslima wrote:OMG. It is not relevant whether the kid bought a clock, stole a clock, reassembled a clock, made a clock from spare parts, or built the clock from scratch, most educated people are in agreement of one thing: It wasn't a bomb, it wasn't a hoax bomb. Give it up already!

So it should never have been looked into in the first place by the administration? If you have a beef, find out why the administration called police. Know why you can't find that information? Because they have not been given permission by the family to tell their side of the story.

It is completely clear why they called the police. They found a kid who had a timer-looking device. It was obviously not a bomb, but they couldn't understand why a kid would bring a timer-looking device to school. They figured he had to have some kind of ulterior motive.

When the questioned him, he just kept repeating "It's a clock. I brought it to show my teacher." When they asked him to explain further, he just kept telling them, "it is a clock. It isn't a bomb." They kept pressuring him: "But why did you bring it to school? We think it looks like a bomb" And he said "No, it's a clock". They said "Admit it, it looks like a bomb". He said, "No, it is a clock."

They decided that he was being "passive aggressive" and non responsive to their line of questioning. It was unbelievable that a child in school would bring a NON ASSIGNED project to high school. So they called the police as clearly this was something very very suspicious.

It wasn't even an assignment????? I thought the whole class had brought in a type of clock!!!! This is even more ridiculous.

Is this the boy's side of the story?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Muslima wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Muslima wrote:OMG. It is not relevant whether the kid bought a clock, stole a clock, reassembled a clock, made a clock from spare parts, or built the clock from scratch, most educated people are in agreement of one thing: It wasn't a bomb, it wasn't a hoax bomb. Give it up already!

It is relevant that it looked like a bomb. White kids have been suspended for having gun shaped objects in school. Sorry you can't make this a Muslim thing. You and the media want it to be about islamaphobia, but it's not. The difference is if a white kid had done it, he wouldn't have been invited to the White House.

I don't think you understood what I wrote, I never said anything about it looking like a bomb..In any case, do you think that if Ahmed was named John and was white,the teacher would've raised the alarm ( no pun intended ) and he would be taken in a room with 5 officers, interrogated and arrested after saying multiple times that it was a clock?

Yes I absolutely do. White kids shoot up schools, white kids get suspended for having toy guns, drawings of guns, etc. A white student would have been interrogated and possibly suspended. But a white kid would not have been invited to the White House.

White kid builds marshmallow cannon, wins trip to White House

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Muslima wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Muslima wrote:OMG. It is not relevant whether the kid bought a clock, stole a clock, reassembled a clock, made a clock from spare parts, or built the clock from scratch, most educated people are in agreement of one thing: It wasn't a bomb, it wasn't a hoax bomb. Give it up already!

It is relevant that it looked like a bomb. White kids have been suspended for having gun shaped objects in school. Sorry you can't make this a Muslim thing. You and the media want it to be about islamaphobia, but it's not. The difference is if a white kid had done it, he wouldn't have been invited to the White House.

I don't think you understood what I wrote, I never said anything about it looking like a bomb..In any case, do you think that if Ahmed was named John and was white,the teacher would've raised the alarm ( no pun intended ) and he would be taken in a room with 5 officers, interrogated and arrested after saying multiple times that it was a clock?

Yes I absolutely do. White kids shoot up schools, white kids get suspended for having toy guns, drawings of guns, etc. A white student would have been interrogated and possibly suspended. But a white kid would not have been invited to the White House.

Cute pictures, but those don't look like bombs, assault rifles, etc. and the students shown were not interrogated by police. Let me be more clear: white students who make things that look like actual weapons/explosive devices and are questioned by school authorities are not invited to the White House.



White kid builds marshmallow cannon, wins trip to White House

Anonymous wrote:The boy's parents will not sign a waiver so the school can tell their side of the story:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/09/23/parents-irving-clock-hoax-boy-hide-school-information-public/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Muslima wrote:OMG. It is not relevant whether the kid bought a clock, stole a clock, reassembled a clock, made a clock from spare parts, or built the clock from scratch, most educated people are in agreement of one thing: It wasn't a bomb, it wasn't a hoax bomb. Give it up already!

So it should never have been looked into in the first place by the administration? If you have a beef, find out why the administration called police. Know why you can't find that information? Because they have not been given permission by the family to tell their side of the story.

It is completely clear why they called the police. They found a kid who had a timer-looking device. It was obviously not a bomb, but they couldn't understand why a kid would bring a timer-looking device to school. They figured he had to have some kind of ulterior motive.

When the questioned him, he just kept repeating "It's a clock. I brought it to show my teacher." When they asked him to explain further, he just kept telling them, "it is a clock. It isn't a bomb." They kept pressuring him: "But why did you bring it to school? We think it looks like a bomb" And he said "No, it's a clock". They said "Admit it, it looks like a bomb". He said, "No, it is a clock."

They decided that he was being "passive aggressive" and non responsive to their line of questioning. It was unbelievable that a child in school would bring a NON ASSIGNED project to high school. So they called the police as clearly this was something very very suspicious.

Anonymous wrote:

Muslima wrote:OMG. It is not relevant whether the kid bought a clock, stole a clock, reassembled a clock, made a clock from spare parts, or built the clock from scratch, most educated people are in agreement of one thing: It wasn't a bomb, it wasn't a hoax bomb. Give it up already!

So it should never have been looked into in the first place by the administration? If you have a beef, find out why the administration called police. Know why you can't find that information? Because they have not been given permission by the family to tell their side of the story.

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Muslima wrote:OMG. It is not relevant whether the kid bought a clock, stole a clock, reassembled a clock, made a clock from spare parts, or built the clock from scratch, most educated people are in agreement of one thing: It wasn't a bomb, it wasn't a hoax bomb. Give it up already!

It is relevant that it looked like a bomb. White kids have been suspended for having gun shaped objects in school. Sorry you can't make this a Muslim thing. You and the media want it to be about islamaphobia, but it's not. The difference is if a white kid had done it, he wouldn't have been invited to the White House.

Do you support or oppose the white kid being suspended?

Muslima wrote:OMG. It is not relevant whether the kid bought a clock, stole a clock, reassembled a clock, made a clock from spare parts, or built the clock from scratch, most educated people are in agreement of one thing: It wasn't a bomb, it wasn't a hoax bomb. Give it up already!

Muslima wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Muslima wrote:OMG. It is not relevant whether the kid bought a clock, stole a clock, reassembled a clock, made a clock from spare parts, or built the clock from scratch, most educated people are in agreement of one thing: It wasn't a bomb, it wasn't a hoax bomb. Give it up already!

It is relevant that it looked like a bomb. White kids have been suspended for having gun shaped objects in school. Sorry you can't make this a Muslim thing. You and the media want it to be about islamaphobia, but it's not. The difference is if a white kid had done it, he wouldn't have been invited to the White House.

I don't think you understood what I wrote, I never said anything about it looking like a bomb..In any case, do you think that if Ahmed was named John and was white,the teacher would've raised the alarm ( no pun intended ) and he would be taken in a room with 5 officers, interrogated and arrested after saying multiple times that it was a clock?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Muslima wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Muslima wrote:OMG. It is not relevant whether the kid bought a clock, stole a clock, reassembled a clock, made a clock from spare parts, or built the clock from scratch, most educated people are in agreement of one thing: It wasn't a bomb, it wasn't a hoax bomb. Give it up already!

It is relevant that it looked like a bomb. White kids have been suspended for having gun shaped objects in school. Sorry you can't make this a Muslim thing. You and the media want it to be about islamaphobia, but it's not. The difference is if a white kid had done it, he wouldn't have been invited to the White House.

I don't think you understood what I wrote, I never said anything about it looking like a bomb..In any case, do you think that if Ahmed was named John and was white,the teacher would've raised the alarm ( no pun intended ) and he would be taken in a room with 5 officers, interrogated and arrested after saying multiple times that it was a clock?

Yes I absolutely do. White kids shoot up schools, white kids get suspended for having toy guns, drawings of guns, etc. A white student would have been interrogated and possibly suspended. But a white kid would not have been invited to the White House.

White kid builds marshmallow cannon, wins trip to White House

Anonymous wrote:

Muslima wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Muslima wrote:OMG. It is not relevant whether the kid bought a clock, stole a clock, reassembled a clock, made a clock from spare parts, or built the clock from scratch, most educated people are in agreement of one thing: It wasn't a bomb, it wasn't a hoax bomb. Give it up already!

It is relevant that it looked like a bomb. White kids have been suspended for having gun shaped objects in school. Sorry you can't make this a Muslim thing. You and the media want it to be about islamaphobia, but it's not. The difference is if a white kid had done it, he wouldn't have been invited to the White House.

I don't think you understood what I wrote, I never said anything about it looking like a bomb..In any case, do you think that if Ahmed was named John and was white,the teacher would've raised the alarm ( no pun intended ) and he would be taken in a room with 5 officers, interrogated and arrested after saying multiple times that it was a clock?

Yes I absolutely do. White kids shoot up schools, white kids get suspended for having toy guns, drawings of guns, etc. A white student would have been interrogated and possibly suspended. But a white kid would not have been invited to the White House.