Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interrupting a woman. Where are Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren to defend Noem?
Excuse me, I'm talking!

That’s what she should have said. “I’m talking. I’ll take your question in a moment.” When she allowed thugs to attack him, a man she definitively knows, Elizabeth Warren said her piece. They are not the same.

This isn’t over yet.

+1

The woman shoots dogs, and has thugs attack a man. We can see who she is. Bad.

The man was trying to interrupt the woman while entering her space.

Let's not pretend you MAGAs have problems with interrupting. That's number 1.
Number 2, that wasn't "her space."
Number 3, she is speaking on public matters and refused to answer questions of oversight committees. He identified himself as a senator and was still manhandled and removed.

Stop acting like this is normal or sane or acceptable. Maybe in Gilead. But not in the US.

Anonymous wrote:Noem is so hot.

And only fluff between her ears.

Maybe she's not the right man for the job.

Noem is so hot.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interrupting a woman. Where are Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren to defend Noem?
Excuse me, I'm talking!

That’s what she should have said. “I’m talking. I’ll take your question in a moment.” When she allowed thugs to attack him, a man she definitively knows, Elizabeth Warren said her piece. They are not the same.

This isn’t over yet.

+1

The woman shoots dogs, and has thugs attack a man. We can see who she is. Bad.

75% of us men still find her hot

That tracks since she looks like a porn star.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interrupting a woman. Where are Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren to defend Noem?
Excuse me, I'm talking!

That’s what she should have said. “I’m talking. I’ll take your question in a moment.” When she allowed thugs to attack him, a man she definitively knows, Elizabeth Warren said her piece. They are not the same.

This isn’t over yet.

+1

The woman shoots dogs, and has thugs attack a man. We can see who she is. Bad.

The man was trying to interrupt the woman while entering her space.

Reverse the political parties and the response would be the same. The FBI acted appropriately. Sec. Noem would not have (and could not) override the FBI (they don't report to her).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interrupting a woman. Where are Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren to defend Noem?
Excuse me, I'm talking!

That’s what she should have said. “I’m talking. I’ll take your question in a moment.” When she allowed thugs to attack him, a man she definitively knows, Elizabeth Warren said her piece. They are not the same.

This isn’t over yet.

+1

The woman shoots dogs, and has thugs attack a man. We can see who she is. Bad.

75% of us men still find her hot

Anonymous wrote:Lewandowski? Didn't see that coming.

They’ve been coming together for years.

Anonymous wrote:This was a back bencher who was playing a stupid game and got a stupid prize. Stupid is supposed to hurt. Yawn.

Back bencher? That’s how you speak to your betters?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interrupting a woman. Where are Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren to defend Noem?
Excuse me, I'm talking!

That’s what she should have said. “I’m talking. I’ll take your question in a moment.” When she allowed thugs to attack him, a man she definitively knows, Elizabeth Warren said her piece. They are not the same.

This isn’t over yet.

+1

The woman shoots dogs, and has thugs attack a man. We can see who she is. Bad.

The man was trying to interrupt the woman while entering her space.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interrupting a woman. Where are Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren to defend Noem?
Excuse me, I'm talking!

That’s what she should have said. “I’m talking. I’ll take your question in a moment.” When she allowed thugs to attack him, a man she definitively knows, Elizabeth Warren said her piece. They are not the same.

This isn’t over yet.

As new parents we are taught to ignore a toddler's tantrum completely. If possible, remove them from the area immediately. This approach ensures they learn that such behavior will not get them the attention they seek.

How do we use this idea for Trump and his dementia tantrums?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interrupting a woman. Where are Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren to defend Noem?
Excuse me, I'm talking!

That’s what she should have said. “I’m talking. I’ll take your question in a moment.” When she allowed thugs to attack him, a man she definitively knows, Elizabeth Warren said her piece. They are not the same.

This isn’t over yet.

+1

The woman shoots dogs, and has thugs attack a man. We can see who she is. Bad.

Anonymous wrote:This was a back bencher who was playing a stupid game and got a stupid prize. Stupid is supposed to hurt. Yawn.

You've got that wrong.

This was a back bencher who was playing a stupid game and got a stupid prize. Stupid is supposed to hurt. Yawn.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interrupting a woman. Where are Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren to defend Noem?
Excuse me, I'm talking!

That’s what she should have said. “I’m talking. I’ll take your question in a moment.” When she allowed thugs to attack him, a man she definitively knows, Elizabeth Warren said her piece. They are not the same.

This isn’t over yet.

Well, she could have pulled a Linda Sanchez - "Okay, I know I'm a woman, . . ." Then Democrats would have claimed she was being misandrist.

Lewandowski? Didn't see that coming.