Anonymous wrote:Look at this recent episode. Measles does not fool around.
There was a disastrous epidemic in 2019, when measles spread rapidly across the small Pacific Ocean country of Samoa. Of Samoa’s population of 200,000, more than 5,700 were infected and 83 died, many of them young children. Hospitals were overrun, and the nation declared a state of emergency. To stop the outbreak, Samoa launched a massive vaccination campaign.
The island nation had a lagging measles vaccination rate of only about a third of infants, plummeting from 90 percent in 2013.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First on his list should be putting soda on the list of things people can’t buy with food stamps.
The USDA is in charge of food stamps, not HHS.
The typical MAGA is chock full of notions about what needs to be changed yet they don't even understand what they are talking about.
They don't, but you do, right?
When Michelle Obama wanted to make lunches and food healthier for Americans, the right loss, their ever-loving mind calling her a communist and wanting to take away their choice.... I believe they said the obamas were trying to make a big brother state where everyone had to eat like them
In a move to roll back former first lady Michelle Obama’s healthy lunch initiative, the Trump administration unveiled a rule on Monday to eliminate some of the nutritional standards currently set in place. Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue said schools will no longer have to try so hard to cut the salt in students’ meals or work in whole grains and non-fat milk.
Not all were opposed to Obama’s initiative, as a Christian Science Monitor report published in January 2017 in JAMA Pediatrics found an increase in six nutrients among students who had been served the federally regulated lunches.
“It’s discouraging that just days into his tenure, one of the first things that Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue will do is to roll back progress on the quality of the meals served to America’s children,” Margo Woota, of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, said in a statement, according to U.S. News & World Report
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First on his list should be putting soda on the list of things people can’t buy with food stamps.
The USDA is in charge of food stamps, not HHS.
The typical MAGA is chock full of notions about what needs to be changed yet they don't even understand what they are talking about.
They don't, but you do, right?
Vaccines have eliminated and vastly reduced the incidence of a number of serious infectious diseases. before the vaccine was developed in the 60s, one hundred percent of the population got measles. Most recover but there are deaths and very very serious outcomes for a percentage of those infected.
They don’t even think about all this. 100 years ago we had a bunch of “schools for the blind” and “schools for the deaf,” why? Because childhood illnesses - measles especially - left a small proportion of children permanently disabled. Measles also had a death rate of around .1%.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First on his list should be putting soda on the list of things people can’t buy with food stamps.
The USDA is in charge of food stamps, not HHS.
The typical MAGA is chock full of notions about what needs to be changed yet they don't even understand what they are talking about.
They don't, but you do, right?
Vaccines have eliminated and vastly reduced the incidence of a number of serious infectious diseases. before the vaccine was developed in the 60s, one hundred percent of the population got measles. Most recover but there are deaths and very very serious outcomes for a percentage of those infected.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First on his list should be putting soda on the list of things people can’t buy with food stamps.
The USDA is in charge of food stamps, not HHS.
The typical MAGA is chock full of notions about what needs to be changed yet they don't even understand what they are talking about.
They don't, but you do, right?
Anonymous wrote:I think RFK is as nuts as anyone, but I also think Kamala made a huge error by not even talking to the guy when he was going to drop out.
I don't think she would have even needed to promise him a cabinet position, just a seat at the table that she was promising other individuals who she disagrees with.
I think he honestly could have made the difference in the election which is sad on so many levels but also true
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First on his list should be putting soda on the list of things people can’t buy with food stamps.
The USDA is in charge of food stamps, not HHS.
The typical MAGA is chock full of notions about what needs to be changed yet they don't even understand what they are talking about.
They don't, but you do, right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First on his list should be putting soda on the list of things people can’t buy with food stamps.
The USDA is in charge of food stamps, not HHS.
The typical MAGA is chock full of notions about what needs to be changed yet they don't even understand what they are talking about.
They don't, but you do, right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s true! We are a disgusting sloppy, crap eating drug using mess of a country. I live RFK’s ideas but no way will he actually be able to change anything if he’s even confirmed. The lobby is too big and the damage is too deep.
And Trump and Congressional republicans don’t want it to be better. Getting Big Pharma out and rehabilitating our food system is not a new idea. Folks should watch some of the documentaries already out about this.
Big pharma is why my mother has meds that help alleviate and slow her Parkinson's. Or do you think if she just ate some more raw food she'd no longer have this degenerative disease?
Anyway
Surely you have come across folks that think every disease and condition can be treated with diet and supplements. It is exhausting and dull. I always say I have to go and could you just email me the info.
I am PP and same. My mother - the one with Parkinson's - had a cancer scare a while ago, and one of her crunchiest friends called me hysterically shouting that my mom had to go onto a raw vegan diet immediately. Meanwhile that friend died mysteriously right at the beginning of COVID (which was horrible) - thank the lord my mom is still here fighting the good fight every day. I am a vegetarian myself but she can eat whatever stupid hamburgers she wants. And thank gd she has the meds that keep her here with us.
Wrong direction:
https://carnivore.diet/mimi-improved-rheumatoid-arthritis-parkinsons-disease-and-osteopenia-on-the-carnivore-diet/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First on his list should be putting soda on the list of things people can’t buy with food stamps.
The USDA is in charge of food stamps, not HHS.
The typical MAGA is chock full of notions about what needs to be changed yet they don't even understand what they are talking about.
They don't, but you do, right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First on his list should be putting soda on the list of things people can’t buy with food stamps.
The USDA is in charge of food stamps, not HHS.
The typical MAGA is chock full of notions about what needs to be changed yet they don't even understand what they are talking about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread does not want to address why thousand and thousands of highly educated and experienced docs recommend a vaccine schedule for their patients. Choose your advice wisely.
Doctors also recommend every pill, surgery, test and medical intervention that they can. That's how they make money.
What's more interesting is what doctors do with themselves and their own kids...
Once you start thinking about doctors as mechanics that work on people, it all starts to make sense.
Why is my doc recommending a vaccine schedule? She does not even necessarily make money since we all go to the pharmacy or the supermarket half the time to get vaccines. My kids would need a lot more medical attention and she would make more money if they got a bunch of childhood diseases in fact. Maybe even some big fat hospital bills.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a long time healthy volunteer at NIH and the VRC, vaccines only started full double blinded placedo testing in 2018 after RFK sued. Fun fact, the Covid phase 1 testing cut corners.
You have a link that shows this?
Does a researcher and nurse at the vrc who verbally told me they sped up the study count?
Stop spreading disinformation based on hearsay. This is stupid. Of course timelines were accelerated. But the trials were double-blinded and placebo-contolled. It's all in the public record. You can see the study designs yourself in ClinicalTrials.gov.
And while you're looking at the Pfizer one, note that the vaccine group had more total deaths than the control.
You realize this was published in NEJM, and this is not true. See the supplementary tables. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577#supplementary-materials
And I should add- although there were more deaths in the placebo group, it did not come close to reaching statistical significance.
Pfizer's six month trial report: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.28.21261159v1.full-text
"During the blinded, controlled period, 15 BNT162b2 and 14 placebo recipients died; during the open-label period, 3 BNT162b2 and 2 original placebo recipients who received BNT162b2 after unblinding died. None of these deaths were considered related to BNT162b2 by investigators. Causes of death were balanced between BNT162b2 and placebo groups (Table S4)."
Then based on these data, they tried to impose this vaccine on 200+ million workers and told you the world would end if people didn't take it. That's what experts did.
You don't seem to realize that 15 deaths vs. 14 deaths is no where close to statistical significance. The death rate was essentially equal in both groups.