Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a huge Harris supporter, and I think she made a big mistake not going on Rogan. JD Vance makes my skin crawl and I think he's a sociopath, but he's coming off as very likeable in this interview.

Rogan is unapologetically pro-choice and Harris missed a great opportunity to discuss the ramifications of abortion bans with an audience who aren't hearing it in other places.

it's not that she can't get interviewed by him but like why would she waste her time? She needs to motivate her voters, not waste her time talking to Trump voters.

They are not all trump voters…I mean go look at the Joe Rogan subreddit. This would’ve been a great way to reach a huge audience of people who she otherwise might not reach.

Big mistake, HUGE.

I think a large percentage are Trump voters. I think she could actually use her time more effectively elsewhere.

In any case, what do you or I know? she's running a strong campaign. If it would help her to go on this podcast she would go, but obviously the campaign feels that her time and energy is better spent elsewhere.

This is the kicker - Rogan is a whole day. At this point in the campaign that's a really tough decision. Hit a couple of swing states or spend a day doing the podcast. I think it falls into the category of a nice to have but not necessary.

Except JD Vance just did it for nearly four hours in the morning yesterday and was back out campaigning at a rally after lunch.

JD is a great speaker he really is in touch with what's going on and makes great points. I hope he will be out first millennial president.

Just don't ask him to order a donut

You guys … Vance said some really, really weird stuff. He reminds me of Pence in the 2016 campaign. His delivery is good. His message is batsh*t wackadoodle conspiracy nonsense.

Anonymous wrote:What a great interview with Vance. It really makes Democrats looks stupid when they were trying to call this guy weird because he is so normal and down to earth. Vance expressed very common sense views on a variety of topics Rogan discussed.

+1

Go ahead and disagree with his politics but he’s not weird and the interview/conversation is excellent.

What a great interview with Vance. It really makes Democrats looks stupid when they were trying to call this guy weird because he is so normal and down to earth. Vance expressed very common sense views on a variety of topics Rogan discussed.

Yes not going on Rogan is a huge mistake. He is not a Trumper!!! I don’t know where that narrative comes from but she should make time for the interview. It just looks bad amd she could have reached a lot of people. She will be judged for this. I don’t know who her advisers are except the BIL but it’s a huge mistake. Incan appreciate she likes to be prepared but how hard is it to have a conversation - his podcast is a conversation. Honestly I wish she would do it but there is no tome left!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a huge Harris supporter, and I think she made a big mistake not going on Rogan. JD Vance makes my skin crawl and I think he's a sociopath, but he's coming off as very likeable in this interview.

Rogan is unapologetically pro-choice and Harris missed a great opportunity to discuss the ramifications of abortion bans with an audience who aren't hearing it in other places.

it's not that she can't get interviewed by him but like why would she waste her time? She needs to motivate her voters, not waste her time talking to Trump voters.

They are not all trump voters…I mean go look at the Joe Rogan subreddit. This would’ve been a great way to reach a huge audience of people who she otherwise might not reach.

Big mistake, HUGE.

I think a large percentage are Trump voters. I think she could actually use her time more effectively elsewhere.

In any case, what do you or I know? she's running a strong campaign. If it would help her to go on this podcast she would go, but obviously the campaign feels that her time and energy is better spent elsewhere.

This is the kicker - Rogan is a whole day. At this point in the campaign that's a really tough decision. Hit a couple of swing states or spend a day doing the podcast. I think it falls into the category of a nice to have but not necessary.

Except JD Vance just did it for nearly four hours in the morning yesterday and was back out campaigning at a rally after lunch.

JD is a great speaker he really is in touch with what's going on and makes great points. I hope he will be out first millennial president.

I’m hoping he runs for president next. Just a genuinely great guy.

It’s refreshing to have a candidate under 45!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vance Podcast Just dropped, 3 hours!

YES! I know what I'm listening to tonight!

Already at 2.3M views ! Much higher than call your daddy 3 weeks ago

Now it's 5.7M, amazing!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One would think someone who served as President for four years could correctly answer how many nations have nuclear weapons. But not Trump.

Not even close. Try 9:

United States
Russia
United Kingdom
France
China
India
Pakistan
North Korea
Israel

The nuclear-weapon states (NWS) are the five states—China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States—officially recognized as possessing nuclear weapons by the NPT.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vance Podcast Just dropped, 3 hours!

YES! I know what I'm listening to tonight!

Already at 2.3M views ! Much higher than call your daddy 3 weeks ago

I listened to the Kamala appearance and all she talked about was Trump and abortion. I still know nothing about her true opinions on any other topic. She isn't genuine.

Same here. I don’t know what she’s for other than how much she thinks Trump is evil. All she does is talk about trump. As an independent voter, I don’t care nor do I want to hear this, I want her to answer BASIC questions about policy without bringing up DT.

She’s the only candidate who will sign a federal abortion law and is calling for a ceasefire in the Middle East. Any other questions?

It's taken her 4 years to do it? Maybe she'll get to those in another 4 years? lol

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a huge Harris supporter, and I think she made a big mistake not going on Rogan. JD Vance makes my skin crawl and I think he's a sociopath, but he's coming off as very likeable in this interview.

Rogan is unapologetically pro-choice and Harris missed a great opportunity to discuss the ramifications of abortion bans with an audience who aren't hearing it in other places.

it's not that she can't get interviewed by him but like why would she waste her time? She needs to motivate her voters, not waste her time talking to Trump voters.

They are not all trump voters…I mean go look at the Joe Rogan subreddit. This would’ve been a great way to reach a huge audience of people who she otherwise might not reach.

Big mistake, HUGE.

I think a large percentage are Trump voters. I think she could actually use her time more effectively elsewhere.

In any case, what do you or I know? she's running a strong campaign. If it would help her to go on this podcast she would go, but obviously the campaign feels that her time and energy is better spent elsewhere.

This is the kicker - Rogan is a whole day. At this point in the campaign that's a really tough decision. Hit a couple of swing states or spend a day doing the podcast. I think it falls into the category of a nice to have but not necessary.

Except JD Vance just did it for nearly four hours in the morning yesterday and was back out campaigning at a rally after lunch.

JD is a great speaker he really is in touch with what's going on and makes great points. I hope he will be out first millennial president.

I’m hoping he runs for president next. Just a genuinely great guy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a huge Harris supporter, and I think she made a big mistake not going on Rogan. JD Vance makes my skin crawl and I think he's a sociopath, but he's coming off as very likeable in this interview.

Rogan is unapologetically pro-choice and Harris missed a great opportunity to discuss the ramifications of abortion bans with an audience who aren't hearing it in other places.

it's not that she can't get interviewed by him but like why would she waste her time? She needs to motivate her voters, not waste her time talking to Trump voters.

They are not all trump voters…I mean go look at the Joe Rogan subreddit. This would’ve been a great way to reach a huge audience of people who she otherwise might not reach.

Big mistake, HUGE.

I think a large percentage are Trump voters. I think she could actually use her time more effectively elsewhere.

In any case, what do you or I know? she's running a strong campaign. If it would help her to go on this podcast she would go, but obviously the campaign feels that her time and energy is better spent elsewhere.

This is the kicker - Rogan is a whole day. At this point in the campaign that's a really tough decision. Hit a couple of swing states or spend a day doing the podcast. I think it falls into the category of a nice to have but not necessary.

Except JD Vance just did it for nearly four hours in the morning yesterday and was back out campaigning at a rally after lunch.

Harris would need a few days to prepare before going on Rogan, which makes the timing impossible at this point.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a huge Harris supporter, and I think she made a big mistake not going on Rogan. JD Vance makes my skin crawl and I think he's a sociopath, but he's coming off as very likeable in this interview.

Rogan is unapologetically pro-choice and Harris missed a great opportunity to discuss the ramifications of abortion bans with an audience who aren't hearing it in other places.

it's not that she can't get interviewed by him but like why would she waste her time? She needs to motivate her voters, not waste her time talking to Trump voters.

They are not all trump voters…I mean go look at the Joe Rogan subreddit. This would’ve been a great way to reach a huge audience of people who she otherwise might not reach.

Big mistake, HUGE.

I think a large percentage are Trump voters. I think she could actually use her time more effectively elsewhere.

In any case, what do you or I know? she's running a strong campaign. If it would help her to go on this podcast she would go, but obviously the campaign feels that her time and energy is better spent elsewhere.

This is the kicker - Rogan is a whole day. At this point in the campaign that's a really tough decision. Hit a couple of swing states or spend a day doing the podcast. I think it falls into the category of a nice to have but not necessary.

Except JD Vance just did it for nearly four hours in the morning yesterday and was back out campaigning at a rally after lunch.

JD is a great speaker he really is in touch with what's going on and makes great points. I hope he will be out first millennial president.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a huge Harris supporter, and I think she made a big mistake not going on Rogan. JD Vance makes my skin crawl and I think he's a sociopath, but he's coming off as very likeable in this interview.

Rogan is unapologetically pro-choice and Harris missed a great opportunity to discuss the ramifications of abortion bans with an audience who aren't hearing it in other places.

it's not that she can't get interviewed by him but like why would she waste her time? She needs to motivate her voters, not waste her time talking to Trump voters.

They are not all trump voters…I mean go look at the Joe Rogan subreddit. This would’ve been a great way to reach a huge audience of people who she otherwise might not reach.

Big mistake, HUGE.

I think a large percentage are Trump voters. I think she could actually use her time more effectively elsewhere.

In any case, what do you or I know? she's running a strong campaign. If it would help her to go on this podcast she would go, but obviously the campaign feels that her time and energy is better spent elsewhere.

This is the kicker - Rogan is a whole day. At this point in the campaign that's a really tough decision. Hit a couple of swing states or spend a day doing the podcast. I think it falls into the category of a nice to have but not necessary.

Except JD Vance just did it for nearly four hours in the morning yesterday and was back out campaigning at a rally after lunch.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a huge Harris supporter, and I think she made a big mistake not going on Rogan. JD Vance makes my skin crawl and I think he's a sociopath, but he's coming off as very likeable in this interview.

Rogan is unapologetically pro-choice and Harris missed a great opportunity to discuss the ramifications of abortion bans with an audience who aren't hearing it in other places.

it's not that she can't get interviewed by him but like why would she waste her time? She needs to motivate her voters, not waste her time talking to Trump voters.

They are not all trump voters…I mean go look at the Joe Rogan subreddit. This would’ve been a great way to reach a huge audience of people who she otherwise might not reach.

Big mistake, HUGE.

I think a large percentage are Trump voters. I think she could actually use her time more effectively elsewhere.

Known for its influence and large audience, Rogan’s show offers a unique opportunity for candidates to connect with younger, often independent-minded listeners in an unconventional setting. Rogan’s audience skews overwhelmingly male (80%), with a majority of listeners (51%) falling within the critical 18-34 age range. Politically, 35% of listeners identify as Independent or “something else,” while 32% align with Republicans, and 27% align with Democrats.

https://www.edisonresearch.com/who-joe-rogan-listeners-are-likely-to-support-in-the-election/

Great demographic if you’re on a promo tour, because they have free time and some spending money. But hard to get that group to a ballot box. Even if they enjoy the spectacle of trump, that’s not motivation to act.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a huge Harris supporter, and I think she made a big mistake not going on Rogan. JD Vance makes my skin crawl and I think he's a sociopath, but he's coming off as very likeable in this interview.

Rogan is unapologetically pro-choice and Harris missed a great opportunity to discuss the ramifications of abortion bans with an audience who aren't hearing it in other places.

it's not that she can't get interviewed by him but like why would she waste her time? She needs to motivate her voters, not waste her time talking to Trump voters.

They are not all trump voters…I mean go look at the Joe Rogan subreddit. This would’ve been a great way to reach a huge audience of people who she otherwise might not reach.

Big mistake, HUGE.

I think a large percentage are Trump voters. I think she could actually use her time more effectively elsewhere.

Known for its influence and large audience, Rogan’s show offers a unique opportunity for candidates to connect with younger, often independent-minded listeners in an unconventional setting. Rogan’s audience skews overwhelmingly male (80%), with a majority of listeners (51%) falling within the critical 18-34 age range. Politically, 35% of listeners identify as Independent or “something else,” while 32% align with Republicans, and 27% align with Democrats.

https://www.edisonresearch.com/who-joe-rogan-listeners-are-likely-to-support-in-the-election/