Anonymous wrote:soAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I saw them at a game this fall and saw about 6 kids on the bench for a 9v9 game, sweet playing time.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the team was loaded already, 1) why did they add to the team and take away from others, 2) what does it teach our children to start with one club and 6 weeks into the season, quite on your teammates and switch to another team. The nepotism culture has a trickle down effect into the decisions that are made. Prioritizing the individual over the development of the team. Your kid is wonderful and the principles of quitting on teammates and playing to win will get them far in life.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:first the 2013s you talking about are 6th graders. The 2014 is a 5th grader and shes not the leading scorer. Shes too tiny but yes scored off a free kick.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So its nepotism at play or not?
At NVA? 100%
If these kids are good enough to play up it shouldn’t matter. If they are not then yes nepotism
4th graders kid play up in 7th graders groups, 100% nepo!
They are lead scorers playing 3+ games all fall. Cope harder about your average player. Those girls are amazing everyone knows it.
We are talking about different players. There are two former great falls 2014 girls playing 11v11 with the 2013 red team and regularly score game after game; but keep being salty. They got cleared to tryout for nva next year already so you obviously have no idea what you are taking about. Unless you're the pissy parent being rude about them because they took your player's starting position.
Whoa! Where is this coming from? They don't even talk about those 2 girls, I don't know who is salty here. You?
I know that the 2013 team was already good before they joined the team, so don't claim the success because of a new girl, They were just lucky to join the great team!
And because the score doesn't mean they are better than any players, soccer is a team sport, we play as a team!
They probably had room because the TD’s kid and multiple 2013s play up all the time for 2012 NVA.
That former GFR parent drew some unnecessary attention by posting though. Sidelines will be lit lol
The 2013's played in two leagues in the fall U12 9v9 RL and EDP U13 11v11. Thus the need for a larger roster for playing in multiple leagues and playing focus on playing up U13 11v11, and playing up in tournaments U13 11v11. If you have a few extra players for the eight U12 9v9 games, then so be it. Haters looking in from the outside can hate if they want.
From this thread, it looks like there are plenty of haters on the inside
I doubt the haters are from the inside. If they were insiders, there wouldn't be some much incorrect information being posted.
Far most of the info here seems to be insider. And accurate for all of the years. Nepo drama… “anonymous” rebuttals. Even the obviously misguided 2011s are better posts from the old vs new families (or coach?) lol. Sounds like all the teams are having a ball in year 2. Between this and tsj threads Carry on the entertainment. Playoff season confirmed ✅
soAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I saw them at a game this fall and saw about 6 kids on the bench for a 9v9 game, sweet playing time.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the team was loaded already, 1) why did they add to the team and take away from others, 2) what does it teach our children to start with one club and 6 weeks into the season, quite on your teammates and switch to another team. The nepotism culture has a trickle down effect into the decisions that are made. Prioritizing the individual over the development of the team. Your kid is wonderful and the principles of quitting on teammates and playing to win will get them far in life.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:first the 2013s you talking about are 6th graders. The 2014 is a 5th grader and shes not the leading scorer. Shes too tiny but yes scored off a free kick.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So its nepotism at play or not?
At NVA? 100%
If these kids are good enough to play up it shouldn’t matter. If they are not then yes nepotism
4th graders kid play up in 7th graders groups, 100% nepo!
They are lead scorers playing 3+ games all fall. Cope harder about your average player. Those girls are amazing everyone knows it.
We are talking about different players. There are two former great falls 2014 girls playing 11v11 with the 2013 red team and regularly score game after game; but keep being salty. They got cleared to tryout for nva next year already so you obviously have no idea what you are taking about. Unless you're the pissy parent being rude about them because they took your player's starting position.
Whoa! Where is this coming from? They don't even talk about those 2 girls, I don't know who is salty here. You?
I know that the 2013 team was already good before they joined the team, so don't claim the success because of a new girl, They were just lucky to join the great team!
And because the score doesn't mean they are better than any players, soccer is a team sport, we play as a team!
They probably had room because the TD’s kid and multiple 2013s play up all the time for 2012 NVA.
That former GFR parent drew some unnecessary attention by posting though. Sidelines will be lit lol
The 2013's played in two leagues in the fall U12 9v9 RL and EDP U13 11v11. Thus the need for a larger roster for playing in multiple leagues and playing focus on playing up U13 11v11, and playing up in tournaments U13 11v11. If you have a few extra players for the eight U12 9v9 games, then so be it. Haters looking in from the outside can hate if they want.
From this thread, it looks like there are plenty of haters on the inside
I doubt the haters are from the inside. If they were insiders, there wouldn't be some much incorrect information being posted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I saw them at a game this fall and saw about 6 kids on the bench for a 9v9 game, sweet playing time.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the team was loaded already, 1) why did they add to the team and take away from others, 2) what does it teach our children to start with one club and 6 weeks into the season, quite on your teammates and switch to another team. The nepotism culture has a trickle down effect into the decisions that are made. Prioritizing the individual over the development of the team. Your kid is wonderful and the principles of quitting on teammates and playing to win will get them far in life.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:first the 2013s you talking about are 6th graders. The 2014 is a 5th grader and shes not the leading scorer. Shes too tiny but yes scored off a free kick.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So its nepotism at play or not?
At NVA? 100%
If these kids are good enough to play up it shouldn’t matter. If they are not then yes nepotism
4th graders kid play up in 7th graders groups, 100% nepo!
They are lead scorers playing 3+ games all fall. Cope harder about your average player. Those girls are amazing everyone knows it.
We are talking about different players. There are two former great falls 2014 girls playing 11v11 with the 2013 red team and regularly score game after game; but keep being salty. They got cleared to tryout for nva next year already so you obviously have no idea what you are taking about. Unless you're the pissy parent being rude about them because they took your player's starting position.
Whoa! Where is this coming from? They don't even talk about those 2 girls, I don't know who is salty here. You?
I know that the 2013 team was already good before they joined the team, so don't claim the success because of a new girl, They were just lucky to join the great team!
And because the score doesn't mean they are better than any players, soccer is a team sport, we play as a team!
They probably had room because the TD’s kid and multiple 2013s play up all the time for 2012 NVA.
That former GFR parent drew some unnecessary attention by posting though. Sidelines will be lit lol
The 2013's played in two leagues in the fall U12 9v9 RL and EDP U13 11v11. Thus the need for a larger roster for playing in multiple leagues and playing focus on playing up U13 11v11, and playing up in tournaments U13 11v11. If you have a few extra players for the eight U12 9v9 games, then so be it. Haters looking in from the outside can hate if they want.
From this thread, it looks like there are plenty of haters on the inside
First, yes there are decent girls on lower team. 2nd, at this age, its about development. 10-11 yr old winning games means nothingAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The new girls played on both 2013 and 2014 RL teams. Which is part of the problem. In EDP (11v11) , they could pulled from the lower 2013 team. This sends a clear message to other parents in the club. It’s not hate more so frustration of club politics. There are a bunch of good players in the club already. The correct thing to do is allow girls from a lower team a chance to play up. But when a club already has your money they don't care.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I saw them at a game this fall and saw about 6 kids on the bench for a 9v9 game, sweet playing time.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the team was loaded already, 1) why did they add to the team and take away from others, 2) what does it teach our children to start with one club and 6 weeks into the season, quite on your teammates and switch to another team. The nepotism culture has a trickle down effect into the decisions that are made. Prioritizing the individual over the development of the team. Your kid is wonderful and the principles of quitting on teammates and playing to win will get them far in life.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:first the 2013s you talking about are 6th graders. The 2014 is a 5th grader and shes not the leading scorer. Shes too tiny but yes scored off a free kick.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So its nepotism at play or not?
At NVA? 100%
If these kids are good enough to play up it shouldn’t matter. If they are not then yes nepotism
4th graders kid play up in 7th graders groups, 100% nepo!
They are lead scorers playing 3+ games all fall. Cope harder about your average player. Those girls are amazing everyone knows it.
We are talking about different players. There are two former great falls 2014 girls playing 11v11 with the 2013 red team and regularly score game after game; but keep being salty. They got cleared to tryout for nva next year already so you obviously have no idea what you are taking about. Unless you're the pissy parent being rude about them because they took your player's starting position.
Whoa! Where is this coming from? They don't even talk about those 2 girls, I don't know who is salty here. You?
I know that the 2013 team was already good before they joined the team, so don't claim the success because of a new girl, They were just lucky to join the great team!
And because the score doesn't mean they are better than any players, soccer is a team sport, we play as a team!
They probably had room because the TD’s kid and multiple 2013s play up all the time for 2012 NVA.
That former GFR parent drew some unnecessary attention by posting though. Sidelines will be lit lol
The 2013's played in two leagues in the fall U12 9v9 RL and EDP U13 11v11. Thus the need for a larger roster for playing in multiple leagues and playing focus on playing up U13 11v11, and playing up in tournaments U13 11v11. If you have a few extra players for the eight U12 9v9 games, then so be it. Haters looking in from the outside can hate if they want.
If there are quality players on the lower team I’m sure they would have been moved up or made the top team at tryouts at the beginning of the season. I’m guessing the quality isn’t there on the lower team?
Anonymous wrote:The new girls played on both 2013 and 2014 RL teams. Which is part of the problem. In EDP (11v11) , they could pulled from the lower 2013 team. This sends a clear message to other parents in the club. It’s not hate more so frustration of club politics. There are a bunch of good players in the club already. The correct thing to do is allow girls from a lower team a chance to play up. But when a club already has your money they don't care.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I saw them at a game this fall and saw about 6 kids on the bench for a 9v9 game, sweet playing time.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the team was loaded already, 1) why did they add to the team and take away from others, 2) what does it teach our children to start with one club and 6 weeks into the season, quite on your teammates and switch to another team. The nepotism culture has a trickle down effect into the decisions that are made. Prioritizing the individual over the development of the team. Your kid is wonderful and the principles of quitting on teammates and playing to win will get them far in life.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:first the 2013s you talking about are 6th graders. The 2014 is a 5th grader and shes not the leading scorer. Shes too tiny but yes scored off a free kick.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So its nepotism at play or not?
At NVA? 100%
If these kids are good enough to play up it shouldn’t matter. If they are not then yes nepotism
4th graders kid play up in 7th graders groups, 100% nepo!
They are lead scorers playing 3+ games all fall. Cope harder about your average player. Those girls are amazing everyone knows it.
We are talking about different players. There are two former great falls 2014 girls playing 11v11 with the 2013 red team and regularly score game after game; but keep being salty. They got cleared to tryout for nva next year already so you obviously have no idea what you are taking about. Unless you're the pissy parent being rude about them because they took your player's starting position.
Whoa! Where is this coming from? They don't even talk about those 2 girls, I don't know who is salty here. You?
I know that the 2013 team was already good before they joined the team, so don't claim the success because of a new girl, They were just lucky to join the great team!
And because the score doesn't mean they are better than any players, soccer is a team sport, we play as a team!
They probably had room because the TD’s kid and multiple 2013s play up all the time for 2012 NVA.
That former GFR parent drew some unnecessary attention by posting though. Sidelines will be lit lol
The 2013's played in two leagues in the fall U12 9v9 RL and EDP U13 11v11. Thus the need for a larger roster for playing in multiple leagues and playing focus on playing up U13 11v11, and playing up in tournaments U13 11v11. If you have a few extra players for the eight U12 9v9 games, then so be it. Haters looking in from the outside can hate if they want.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I saw them at a game this fall and saw about 6 kids on the bench for a 9v9 game, sweet playing time.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the team was loaded already, 1) why did they add to the team and take away from others, 2) what does it teach our children to start with one club and 6 weeks into the season, quite on your teammates and switch to another team. The nepotism culture has a trickle down effect into the decisions that are made. Prioritizing the individual over the development of the team. Your kid is wonderful and the principles of quitting on teammates and playing to win will get them far in life.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:first the 2013s you talking about are 6th graders. The 2014 is a 5th grader and shes not the leading scorer. Shes too tiny but yes scored off a free kick.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So its nepotism at play or not?
At NVA? 100%
If these kids are good enough to play up it shouldn’t matter. If they are not then yes nepotism
4th graders kid play up in 7th graders groups, 100% nepo!
They are lead scorers playing 3+ games all fall. Cope harder about your average player. Those girls are amazing everyone knows it.
We are talking about different players. There are two former great falls 2014 girls playing 11v11 with the 2013 red team and regularly score game after game; but keep being salty. They got cleared to tryout for nva next year already so you obviously have no idea what you are taking about. Unless you're the pissy parent being rude about them because they took your player's starting position.
Whoa! Where is this coming from? They don't even talk about those 2 girls, I don't know who is salty here. You?
I know that the 2013 team was already good before they joined the team, so don't claim the success because of a new girl, They were just lucky to join the great team!
And because the score doesn't mean they are better than any players, soccer is a team sport, we play as a team!
They probably had room because the TD’s kid and multiple 2013s play up all the time for 2012 NVA.
That former GFR parent drew some unnecessary attention by posting though. Sidelines will be lit lol
The 2013's played in two leagues in the fall U12 9v9 RL and EDP U13 11v11. Thus the need for a larger roster for playing in multiple leagues and playing focus on playing up U13 11v11, and playing up in tournaments U13 11v11. If you have a few extra players for the eight U12 9v9 games, then so be it. Haters looking in from the outside can hate if they want.

Anonymous wrote:The new girls played on both 2013 and 2014 RL teams. Which is part of the problem. In EDP (11v11) , they could pulled from the lower 2013 team. This sends a clear message to other parents in the club. It’s not hate more so frustration of club politics. There are a bunch of good players in the club already. The correct thing to do is allow girls from a lower team a chance to play up. But when a club already has your money they don't care.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I saw them at a game this fall and saw about 6 kids on the bench for a 9v9 game, sweet playing time.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the team was loaded already, 1) why did they add to the team and take away from others, 2) what does it teach our children to start with one club and 6 weeks into the season, quite on your teammates and switch to another team. The nepotism culture has a trickle down effect into the decisions that are made. Prioritizing the individual over the development of the team. Your kid is wonderful and the principles of quitting on teammates and playing to win will get them far in life.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:first the 2013s you talking about are 6th graders. The 2014 is a 5th grader and shes not the leading scorer. Shes too tiny but yes scored off a free kick.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So its nepotism at play or not?
At NVA? 100%
If these kids are good enough to play up it shouldn’t matter. If they are not then yes nepotism
4th graders kid play up in 7th graders groups, 100% nepo!
They are lead scorers playing 3+ games all fall. Cope harder about your average player. Those girls are amazing everyone knows it.
We are talking about different players. There are two former great falls 2014 girls playing 11v11 with the 2013 red team and regularly score game after game; but keep being salty. They got cleared to tryout for nva next year already so you obviously have no idea what you are taking about. Unless you're the pissy parent being rude about them because they took your player's starting position.
Whoa! Where is this coming from? They don't even talk about those 2 girls, I don't know who is salty here. You?
I know that the 2013 team was already good before they joined the team, so don't claim the success because of a new girl, They were just lucky to join the great team!
And because the score doesn't mean they are better than any players, soccer is a team sport, we play as a team!
They probably had room because the TD’s kid and multiple 2013s play up all the time for 2012 NVA.
That former GFR parent drew some unnecessary attention by posting though. Sidelines will be lit lol
The 2013's played in two leagues in the fall U12 9v9 RL and EDP U13 11v11. Thus the need for a larger roster for playing in multiple leagues and playing focus on playing up U13 11v11, and playing up in tournaments U13 11v11. If you have a few extra players for the eight U12 9v9 games, then so be it. Haters looking in from the outside can hate if they want.
The new girls played on both 2013 and 2014 RL teams. Which is part of the problem. In EDP (11v11) , they could pulled from the lower 2013 team. This sends a clear message to other parents in the club. It’s not hate more so frustration of club politics. There are a bunch of good players in the club already. The correct thing to do is allow girls from a lower team a chance to play up. But when a club already has your money they don't care.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I saw them at a game this fall and saw about 6 kids on the bench for a 9v9 game, sweet playing time.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the team was loaded already, 1) why did they add to the team and take away from others, 2) what does it teach our children to start with one club and 6 weeks into the season, quite on your teammates and switch to another team. The nepotism culture has a trickle down effect into the decisions that are made. Prioritizing the individual over the development of the team. Your kid is wonderful and the principles of quitting on teammates and playing to win will get them far in life.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:first the 2013s you talking about are 6th graders. The 2014 is a 5th grader and shes not the leading scorer. Shes too tiny but yes scored off a free kick.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So its nepotism at play or not?
At NVA? 100%
If these kids are good enough to play up it shouldn’t matter. If they are not then yes nepotism
4th graders kid play up in 7th graders groups, 100% nepo!
They are lead scorers playing 3+ games all fall. Cope harder about your average player. Those girls are amazing everyone knows it.
We are talking about different players. There are two former great falls 2014 girls playing 11v11 with the 2013 red team and regularly score game after game; but keep being salty. They got cleared to tryout for nva next year already so you obviously have no idea what you are taking about. Unless you're the pissy parent being rude about them because they took your player's starting position.
Whoa! Where is this coming from? They don't even talk about those 2 girls, I don't know who is salty here. You?
I know that the 2013 team was already good before they joined the team, so don't claim the success because of a new girl, They were just lucky to join the great team!
And because the score doesn't mean they are better than any players, soccer is a team sport, we play as a team!
They probably had room because the TD’s kid and multiple 2013s play up all the time for 2012 NVA.
That former GFR parent drew some unnecessary attention by posting though. Sidelines will be lit lol
The 2013's played in two leagues in the fall U12 9v9 RL and EDP U13 11v11. Thus the need for a larger roster for playing in multiple leagues and playing focus on playing up U13 11v11, and playing up in tournaments U13 11v11. If you have a few extra players for the eight U12 9v9 games, then so be it. Haters looking in from the outside can hate if they want.
Anonymous wrote:I saw them at a game this fall and saw about 6 kids on the bench for a 9v9 game, sweet playing time.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the team was loaded already, 1) why did they add to the team and take away from others, 2) what does it teach our children to start with one club and 6 weeks into the season, quite on your teammates and switch to another team. The nepotism culture has a trickle down effect into the decisions that are made. Prioritizing the individual over the development of the team. Your kid is wonderful and the principles of quitting on teammates and playing to win will get them far in life.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:first the 2013s you talking about are 6th graders. The 2014 is a 5th grader and shes not the leading scorer. Shes too tiny but yes scored off a free kick.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So its nepotism at play or not?
At NVA? 100%
If these kids are good enough to play up it shouldn’t matter. If they are not then yes nepotism
4th graders kid play up in 7th graders groups, 100% nepo!
They are lead scorers playing 3+ games all fall. Cope harder about your average player. Those girls are amazing everyone knows it.
We are talking about different players. There are two former great falls 2014 girls playing 11v11 with the 2013 red team and regularly score game after game; but keep being salty. They got cleared to tryout for nva next year already so you obviously have no idea what you are taking about. Unless you're the pissy parent being rude about them because they took your player's starting position.
Whoa! Where is this coming from? They don't even talk about those 2 girls, I don't know who is salty here. You?
I know that the 2013 team was already good before they joined the team, so don't claim the success because of a new girl, They were just lucky to join the great team!
And because the score doesn't mean they are better than any players, soccer is a team sport, we play as a team!
They probably had room because the TD’s kid and multiple 2013s play up all the time for 2012 NVA.
That former GFR parent drew some unnecessary attention by posting though. Sidelines will be lit lol
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the team was loaded already, 1) why did they add to the team and take away from others, 2) what does it teach our children to start with one club and 6 weeks into the season, quite on your teammates and switch to another team. The nepotism culture has a trickle down effect into the decisions that are made. Prioritizing the individual over the development of the team. Your kid is wonderful and the principles of quitting on teammates and playing to win will get them far in life.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:first the 2013s you talking about are 6th graders. The 2014 is a 5th grader and shes not the leading scorer. Shes too tiny but yes scored off a free kick.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So its nepotism at play or not?
At NVA? 100%
If these kids are good enough to play up it shouldn’t matter. If they are not then yes nepotism
4th graders kid play up in 7th graders groups, 100% nepo!
The amount of declarative statements that are wrong on here are insanely hilarious. And you people probably feel so right when posting lol. Two 2013's have been on the 2012 team since U8. One 2013 from Red has guest played like twice due to absence and injury, TD's daughter has played with them maybe 4 times.
They are lead scorers playing 3+ games all fall. Cope harder about your average player. Those girls are amazing everyone knows it.
We are talking about different players. There are two former great falls 2014 girls playing 11v11 with the 2013 red team and regularly score game after game; but keep being salty. They got cleared to tryout for nva next year already so you obviously have no idea what you are taking about. Unless you're the pissy parent being rude about them because they took your player's starting position.
Whoa! Where is this coming from? They don't even talk about those 2 girls, I don't know who is salty here. You?
I know that the 2013 team was already good before they joined the team, so don't claim the success because of a new girl, They were just lucky to join the great team!
And because the score doesn't mean they are better than any players, soccer is a team sport, we play as a team!
They probably had room because the TD’s kid and multiple 2013s play up all the time for 2012 NVA.
That former GFR parent drew some unnecessary attention by posting though. Sidelines will be lit lol
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the team was loaded already, 1) why did they add to the team and take away from others, 2) what does it teach our children to start with one club and 6 weeks into the season, quite on your teammates and switch to another team. The nepotism culture has a trickle down effect into the decisions that are made. Prioritizing the individual over the development of the team. Your kid is wonderful and the principles of quitting on teammates and playing to win will get them far in life.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:first the 2013s you talking about are 6th graders. The 2014 is a 5th grader and shes not the leading scorer. Shes too tiny but yes scored off a free kick.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So its nepotism at play or not?
At NVA? 100%
If these kids are good enough to play up it shouldn’t matter. If they are not then yes nepotism
4th graders kid play up in 7th graders groups, 100% nepo!
They are lead scorers playing 3+ games all fall. Cope harder about your average player. Those girls are amazing everyone knows it.
We are talking about different players. There are two former great falls 2014 girls playing 11v11 with the 2013 red team and regularly score game after game; but keep being salty. They got cleared to tryout for nva next year already so you obviously have no idea what you are taking about. Unless you're the pissy parent being rude about them because they took your player's starting position.
Whoa! Where is this coming from? They don't even talk about those 2 girls, I don't know who is salty here. You?
I know that the 2013 team was already good before they joined the team, so don't claim the success because of a new girl, They were just lucky to join the great team!
And because the score doesn't mean they are better than any players, soccer is a team sport, we play as a team!
It sounds like a lot of fun to play for NVA!
Kids enjoy it. The parents on all these forums kinda ruin it. They have so much to say here but act the exact opposite in person towards other parents and/or coaches they talk about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the team was loaded already, 1) why did they add to the team and take away from others, 2) what does it teach our children to start with one club and 6 weeks into the season, quite on your teammates and switch to another team. The nepotism culture has a trickle down effect into the decisions that are made. Prioritizing the individual over the development of the team. Your kid is wonderful and the principles of quitting on teammates and playing to win will get them far in life.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:first the 2013s you talking about are 6th graders. The 2014 is a 5th grader and shes not the leading scorer. Shes too tiny but yes scored off a free kick.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So its nepotism at play or not?
At NVA? 100%
If these kids are good enough to play up it shouldn’t matter. If they are not then yes nepotism
4th graders kid play up in 7th graders groups, 100% nepo!
They are lead scorers playing 3+ games all fall. Cope harder about your average player. Those girls are amazing everyone knows it.
We are talking about different players. There are two former great falls 2014 girls playing 11v11 with the 2013 red team and regularly score game after game; but keep being salty. They got cleared to tryout for nva next year already so you obviously have no idea what you are taking about. Unless you're the pissy parent being rude about them because they took your player's starting position.
Whoa! Where is this coming from? They don't even talk about those 2 girls, I don't know who is salty here. You?
I know that the 2013 team was already good before they joined the team, so don't claim the success because of a new girl, They were just lucky to join the great team!
And because the score doesn't mean they are better than any players, soccer is a team sport, we play as a team!
It sounds like a lot of fun to play for NVA!