Anonymous wrote:BSC 2012G only have 1 win in 6 games?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How did using 3 big biobanded kids on every team work out for the BSC U14's and U15's this weekend?
Bethesda U14's and U15's even with their multiple biobanded big kids were totally dominated by DCU teams with small players playing up.
Boot and Chase ball has severe limitations at top levels
I'm all for bashing Bethesda's misuse of the bio-banding rule. I was hoping that they would have changed the practice this season for the 2010s. They were blatantly floiting the rule last year playing 3 fully developed 2009 players.
At the same time, let's not understate DCU's physicality by saying "DCU teams with small players playing up." Sure there are some standout smaller players they play up and play portions of the matches, but on the whole, the U15 team is big fast and physical.
I haven't seen a small U15's team anywhere in MLS Next since the puberty testosterone and growth spurts are kicking in at those ages.
That said, DCU has multiple 2011's playing U15
What does playing portions of the match mean?
Everyone plays portions of matches, no?
you sound really defensive. its a big physical fast team. It's ok.
Because you sound simple and stupid discounting their individual technical skills and creativity they use to dominate a Bethesda who on average has a bigger, older more physically aggressive team.
now you sound extremely defensive. I love the players on that team. I'm not a Bethesda parent, or fan, and DCU U15 is not small. You said, "dominated by DCU teams with small players playing up." nobody discounted anything, just calling out your implication that DCU U-15 is small players playing up.
Anonymous wrote:DCU had several small kids
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How did using 3 big biobanded kids on every team work out for the BSC U14's and U15's this weekend?
Bethesda U14's and U15's even with their multiple biobanded big kids were totally dominated by DCU teams with small players playing up.
Boot and Chase ball has severe limitations at top levels
I'm all for bashing Bethesda's misuse of the bio-banding rule. I was hoping that they would have changed the practice this season for the 2010s. They were blatantly floiting the rule last year playing 3 fully developed 2009 players.
At the same time, let's not understate DCU's physicality by saying "DCU teams with small players playing up." Sure there are some standout smaller players they play up and play portions of the matches, but on the whole, the U15 team is big fast and physical.
I haven't seen a small U15's team anywhere in MLS Next since the puberty testosterone and growth spurts are kicking in at those ages.
That said, DCU has multiple 2011's playing U15
What does playing portions of the match mean?
Everyone plays portions of matches, no?
you sound really defensive. its a big physical fast team. It's ok.
Because you sound simple and stupid discounting their individual technical skills and creativity they use to dominate a Bethesda who on average has a bigger, older more physically aggressive team.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:U14s don't have multiple "big bio banded" kids on their roster. If you are going to bash BSC, at least get your facts right.
3 is the maximum allowed by MLS Next
How many are on the roster?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How did using 3 big biobanded kids on every team work out for the BSC U14's and U15's this weekend?
Bethesda U14's and U15's even with their multiple biobanded big kids were totally dominated by DCU teams with small players playing up.
Boot and Chase ball has severe limitations at top levels
I'm all for bashing Bethesda's misuse of the bio-banding rule. I was hoping that they would have changed the practice this season for the 2010s. They were blatantly floiting the rule last year playing 3 fully developed 2009 players.
At the same time, let's not understate DCU's physicality by saying "DCU teams with small players playing up." Sure there are some standout smaller players they play up and play portions of the matches, but on the whole, the U15 team is big fast and physical.
I haven't seen a small U15's team anywhere in MLS Next since the puberty testosterone and growth spurts are kicking in at those ages.
That said, DCU has multiple 2011's playing U15
What does playing portions of the match mean?
Everyone plays portions of matches, no?
you sound really defensive. its a big physical fast team. It's ok.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How did using 3 big biobanded kids on every team work out for the BSC U14's and U15's this weekend?
Bethesda U14's and U15's even with their multiple biobanded big kids were totally dominated by DCU teams with small players playing up.
Boot and Chase ball has severe limitations at top levels
I'm all for bashing Bethesda's misuse of the bio-banding rule. I was hoping that they would have changed the practice this season for the 2010s. They were blatantly floiting the rule last year playing 3 fully developed 2009 players.
At the same time, let's not understate DCU's physicality by saying "DCU teams with small players playing up." Sure there are some standout smaller players they play up and play portions of the matches, but on the whole, the U15 team is big fast and physical.
I haven't seen a small U15's team anywhere in MLS Next since the puberty testosterone and growth spurts are kicking in at those ages.
That said, DCU has multiple 2011's playing U15
What does playing portions of the match mean?
Everyone plays portions of matches, no?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How did using 3 big biobanded kids on every team work out for the BSC U14's and U15's this weekend?
Bethesda U14's and U15's even with their multiple biobanded big kids were totally dominated by DCU teams with small players playing up.
Boot and Chase ball has severe limitations at top levels
I'm all for bashing Bethesda's misuse of the bio-banding rule. I was hoping that they would have changed the practice this season for the 2010s. They were blatantly floiting the rule last year playing 3 fully developed 2009 players.
At the same time, let's not understate DCU's physicality by saying "DCU teams with small players playing up." Sure there are some standout smaller players they play up and play portions of the matches, but on the whole, the U15 team is big fast and physical.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How did using 3 big biobanded kids on every team work out for the BSC U14's and U15's this weekend?
Bethesda U14's and U15's even with their multiple biobanded big kids were totally dominated by DCU teams with small players playing up.
Boot and Chase ball has severe limitations at top levels
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How did using 3 big biobanded kids on every team work out for the BSC U14's and U15's this weekend?
Bethesda U14's and U15's even with their multiple biobanded big kids were totally dominated by DCU teams with small players playing up.
Boot and Chase ball has severe limitations at top levels
Anonymous wrote:U14s don't have multiple "big bio banded" kids on their roster. If you are going to bash BSC, at least get your facts right.
Anonymous wrote:U14s don't have multiple "big bio banded" kids on their roster. If you are going to bash BSC, at least get your facts right.