Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He has a right to free speech because, get this, Supreme Court justices are US citizens.
It’s his private property.
He is a US Supreme Court Judge.
He is supposed to be impartial.
He is not supposed to flout the rules and display partisan symbols, particularly when he is ruling on cases related to that very issue he has so clearly demonstrated he is not impartial at all, but has a very clear bias in favor of the insurrectionists.
If he wants to express his political views in public, he should step down from the SCOTUS. Until then, he needs to keep his views private, or recuse himself from cases where he has no business claiming impartiality. By flying flags supporting the January 6 uprising, Judge Alito demonstrates in full view of the public that he is not impartial, and therefore cannot be on the SCOTUS.
Anonymous wrote:He has a right to free speech because, get this, Supreme Court justices are US citizens.
It’s his private property.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She sounds like a thin skinned baby. Her husband is literally instrumental in slapping the women of this country back 50 years and she can't tolerate a yard sign of protest? Sounds like she is easily baited
No. She didn’t like the profanity in view of children waiting for the school bus. She complained and the person called her a c__. So, she replied to that person. No one cared for three years. It is only being brought up to try to stir up sentiment against her husband
Schools were not open at the time. COVID. Moreover, the beach flag destroys these claims by Alito.
The Alitos are lying, treasonous and seditionist dirtbags. Period.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She sounds like a thin skinned baby. Her husband is literally instrumental in slapping the women of this country back 50 years and she can't tolerate a yard sign of protest? Sounds like she is easily baited
No. She didn’t like the profanity in view of children waiting for the school bus. She complained and the person called her a c__. So, she replied to that person. No one cared for three years. It is only being brought up to try to stir up sentiment against her husband
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She sounds like a thin skinned baby. Her husband is literally instrumental in slapping the women of this country back 50 years and she can't tolerate a yard sign of protest? Sounds like she is easily baited
No. She didn’t like the profanity in view of children waiting for the school bus. She complained and the person called her a c__. So, she replied to that person. No one cared for three years. It is only being brought up to try to stir up sentiment against her husband
Trump is a rapist and is in full view of every man woman and child in this country. Talk about offensive
This is not a Trump thread. Your obsession is real.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She sounds like a thin skinned baby. Her husband is literally instrumental in slapping the women of this country back 50 years and she can't tolerate a yard sign of protest? Sounds like she is easily baited
No. She didn’t like the profanity in view of children waiting for the school bus. She complained and the person called her a c__. So, she replied to that person. No one cared for three years. It is only being brought up to try to stir up sentiment against her husband
Trump is a rapist and is in full view of every man woman and child in this country. Talk about offensive
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She sounds like a thin skinned baby. Her husband is literally instrumental in slapping the women of this country back 50 years and she can't tolerate a yard sign of protest? Sounds like she is easily baited
No. She didn’t like the profanity in view of children waiting for the school bus. She complained and the person called her a c__. So, she replied to that person. No one cared for three years. It is only being brought up to try to stir up sentiment against her husband
Schools were not open at the time. COVID. Moreover, the beach flag destroys these claims by Alito.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Turns out the Washington Post had this story three years ago and decided to protect the Alitos.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/05/25/alito-flag-martha-ann-washington-post/
So much for the “liberal” media
This backs up everything Alito has said. It was raised as a “symbol of distress” by his wife and the Post realized back then it was a non story. The only thing that’s changed is that it’s an election year.
Yawn.
“A Post spokesperson said in the story Saturday the paper declined to report on the story at the time because it appeared the flag was raised by Martha-Ann Alito—and not the justice himself—and it appeared to be connected to a dispute with neighbors and that it was not clear at the time the argument was linked to politics.“
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She sounds like a thin skinned baby. Her husband is literally instrumental in slapping the women of this country back 50 years and she can't tolerate a yard sign of protest? Sounds like she is easily baited
No. She didn’t like the profanity in view of children waiting for the school bus. She complained and the person called her a c__. So, she replied to that person. No one cared for three years. It is only being brought up to try to stir up sentiment against her husband
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She sounds like a thin skinned baby. Her husband is literally instrumental in slapping the women of this country back 50 years and she can't tolerate a yard sign of protest? Sounds like she is easily baited
No. She didn’t like the profanity in view of children waiting for the school bus. She complained and the person called her a c__. So, she replied to that person. No one cared for three years. It is only being brought up to try to stir up sentiment against her husband
Anonymous wrote:She sounds like a thin skinned baby. Her husband is literally instrumental in slapping the women of this country back 50 years and she can't tolerate a yard sign of protest? Sounds like she is easily baited
Anonymous wrote:Turns out the Washington Post had this story three years ago and decided to protect the Alitos.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/05/25/alito-flag-martha-ann-washington-post/
So much for the “liberal” media