Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:History is long, cities are captured and change hands. Civilizations rise and fall.
And we risk nuclear war that could end humanity.
If the Russian Government does this, one thing will be absolutely certain.
I have a very different take on this point.
Let's suppose that Russians first-strike and nuke the US, and they're so successful that the US is wiped off the face of the planet with nuclear weapons, and there is zero damage to Russia. Far-fetched, I know, but this is just a make-believe hypothetical to prove a point.
The net result? I believe there will not be a place on Earth that Russians can vacation or travel to and not be scorned or hated (except maybe North Korea? but certainly no where with a beach..). I believe that Russians, as an ethnicity, will end. No one will want to be associated with Russia or being called a Russian and no amount of Russian propaganda will be able to change that.
https://www.scmp.com/comment/opinion/article/3181617/backlash-against-russians-living-abroad-all-too-familiar-anxious
The US is not an ethnicity - it is fundamentally a collection of people from around the globe who immigrated. The US is so interconnected to the world's financial systems, shipping of goods and services, relatives living abroad, etc. that there is no country on the planet that is not interconnected (except North Korea.. but our ally South Korea covers that part and the US has A LOT of ties to South Korea). Whether you love the US or hate it, the point is that it is what it is and no way to avoid it.
Plus, once the world sees the US, as a powerful country, wiped off the face of the Earth; they will probably turn to China for protection. And what will China do?
Russia will be the only impediment to China's rule of the planet. Xi may not want that. Other chinese officials may not want that. Now. But later? Who knows.
There is only one outcome for Russia and all Russians if they pull the nuclear trigger.
Feel better now?
No![]()
I think the environmental impact from that kind of strike ends it for everyone.
Russia going nuclear is suicide for Russia. It would be pure idiocy.
No it’s not. Russia can still play this card and call our bluff. If Russia launches a strike against Ukraine, are we really going to respond? Are we willing to sacrifice Chicago for Kiev? Los Angeles for Odesa? No. We can certainly put a tighter economic squeeze on Russia but Putin has enough friends to avert an economic collapse.
Comrade Trollski:
We have a new saying in America:
“Fu** around and find out.”
If a nuclear weapon is detonated in Ukraine, I can absolutely promise you this:
NATO will very quickly use the massive military means at its disposal to obliterate what little remains of the Russian military.
Empty bravado.
NP
Go join your countrymen at the front... they need your help.
NP: yes, comrade. Please go directly to Bakhmut.
- it’s only one tiny town, right?
- Russia’s army is the strongest by far, right?
- Russians obviously possess superior intelligence compared to all other races, right? - so their military tactics must also be superior, right?
- Russians have nukes, so obviously they are strongest, right?
- Russians say their soldiers can rip apart decadent NATO tanks with their bare hands, right?
So Comrade Trollski: I must ask you an extremely serious and direct question:
- why are you not going to Bahkmut to solve that little problem??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Almost half of foreign policy experts believe Russia, in its current form, will collapse within the next 10 years. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/content-series/atlantic-council-strategy-paper-series/welcome-to-2033/
Do an accuracy read of their predictions and report back. Didn’t they all believe once Iraq had WMD?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Almost half of foreign policy experts believe Russia, in its current form, will collapse within the next 10 years. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/content-series/atlantic-council-strategy-paper-series/welcome-to-2033/
Do an accuracy read of their predictions and report back. Didn’t they all believe once Iraq had WMD?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do people forget that Russia and Ukraine were in an effective stalemate for eight years prior to this escalation? I see no reason why this can't last the next decade or two.
That stalemate was that Obama told Ukraine to stand down and let Russia take Ukraine, there was no active war, but some smaller scale fighting in another part of Ukraine, where Russia pretended they weren't helping.
Oh, were you in the room when he told them that?![]()
Anonymous wrote:Almost half of foreign policy experts believe Russia, in its current form, will collapse within the next 10 years. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/content-series/atlantic-council-strategy-paper-series/welcome-to-2033/
Anonymous wrote:
Your mistake is to view this through the prism of Russia vs USA. Try it through the lens of USA vs China, and this starts to look like a debacle for team USA. Russia is a regional power, that is no danger to anyone but its immediate neighbors and our foreign policy is being built around them. China is the rising power/peer that has been refashioning the world order to its advantage.
NATO doesn't really have a winning move here. How long are they willing to feed a war of attrition? Even if they kicked Russia back across the border, then what? Permanent bases in Ukraine to preserve them? A Marshall plan to rebuild the Ukraine? Where are these resources going to come from? Are they going to force all the refugees back to repopulate the nation?
This whole thing can consume NATO for a generation. What is China free to do in that time?
Anonymous wrote:
Your mistake is to view this through the prism of Russia vs USA. Try it through the lens of USA vs China, and this starts to look like a debacle for team USA. Russia is a regional power, that is no danger to anyone but its immediate neighbors and our foreign policy is being built around them. China is the rising power/peer that has been refashioning the world order to its advantage.
NATO doesn't really have a winning move here. How long are they willing to feed a war of attrition? Even if they kicked Russia back across the border, then what? Permanent bases in Ukraine to preserve them? A Marshall plan to rebuild the Ukraine? Where are these resources going to come from? Are they going to force all the refugees back to repopulate the nation?
This whole thing can consume NATO for a generation. What is China free to do in that time?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do people forget that Russia and Ukraine were in an effective stalemate for eight years prior to this escalation? I see no reason why this can't last the next decade or two.
That stalemate was that Obama told Ukraine to stand down and let Russia take Ukraine, there was no active war, but some smaller scale fighting in another part of Ukraine, where Russia pretended they weren't helping.
Oh, were you in the room when he told them that?![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do people forget that Russia and Ukraine were in an effective stalemate for eight years prior to this escalation? I see no reason why this can't last the next decade or two.
That stalemate was that Obama told Ukraine to stand down and let Russia take Ukraine, there was no active war, but some smaller scale fighting in another part of Ukraine, where Russia pretended they weren't helping.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do people forget that Russia and Ukraine were in an effective stalemate for eight years prior to this escalation? I see no reason why this can't last the next decade or two.
Because Russia changed that eight-year status quo with its invasion of the rest of Ukraine. Russia had most of Donbas and Crimea. And the West had let it slide without significant consequences - all of them; Obama, Trump, Merkel, Macron, Boris Johnson, Trudeau. If Russia hadn't invaded and sought to take Kyiv, the capital, they'd be doing just fine. Some skirmishing in Donbas. Some minor sanctions. But otherwise Russia would still get its oil revenue, most of Donbas would more or less be incorporated into Russia, and they'd hold on to a nice warm weather port on the Black Sea for its navy and Russian vacationers. 2014 was a total win for Russia. If Russians were smart, they would have enjoyed their victory and that would be that.
Instead, Russians made a colossal mistake by invading the rest of Ukraine. And Ukrainians fought back, destroying its Spetsnaz, paratroopers, and much of the initial armor in the first weeks. Absolutely legendary. But one year later the war has settled into a kind of stalemate. And it's not remotely sustainable. So far, in one year, somewhere between 250,000 and 400,000 Russian and Ukrainian soldiers have died. The civilian casualties are unknowable until there's an accounting of what happened in Mariupol, but it's well into the thousands. For comparison, the US lost 58,000 soldiers in Vietnam over twenty years. The war Russia launched against Ukraine cannot settle into a stalemate. The costs in human lives have been too large. There will be a winner and a loser. Because there is no alternative.
So far, the Biden administration and its NATO allies have navigated this pretty well. Freedom and self-determination on one side. Imperialism and genocide on the other. But no one wanst American or NATO soldiers fighting in Ukraine. So it's a thread the needle situation. This is a problem without an easy solution.
Think the real fear is that the Russian invasion of Ukraine becomes an assassination of Archduke Ferdinand situation. The Law of Unintended Consequences looms large here..
The Spring offensive will collapse what is left of the Russian army.
I'd like to think so. I follow this pretty closely. But I am not so sanguine. Russian artillery is for real.
But Russian men seem to be fine with dying. They are like atheist ISIS. I don't mean this unkindly, but Russian men are genuine weirdos. Take a gander at the 18 + Ukraine war stuff on certain popular websites
It is horrible.
As I always tell the youngsters, don't fight crazy. But Russians are like the crackheads of the world. Bit of a problem
Slavic men and women as a whole are weirdos
Let’s be 100% honest
If you’ve spent any time out east, you know this regardless of their personal politics that it is a totally different civilization post church split.
this is why biden’s policy is the best. He’s optimally letting both sides grind each other down
Am half-Slavic. Used to live in that part of the world. Please don't equate Russians with Czechs, Slovaks, Poles, and Ukrainians. You genuinely don't know what you're talking about. Very much not the same.
DP but it’s funny. It’s what other Slavs like to think but they are all children of the communism. Some a little more than others but essentially the same. But whatever makes you feel better