Anonymous wrote:I really don't think we should have children, yes 15 is a child, competing at this level. It isnt just the abuse and work that the olympic kid is subjected to but all the others angling for that place. It is crazy that if your kid is an actor they can only work a certain number of hours a day but if your kid is an athlete you can grind them into the ground as much as you like.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You could name a few countries that have something at stake here, but Sweden isn’t one of them.
I await your theory on why it took a Swedish lab six weeks to deliver test results of an Olympic favorite in an Olympic season.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You could name a few countries that have something at stake here, but Sweden isn’t one of them.
I await your theory on why it took a Swedish lab six weeks to deliver test results of an Olympic favorite in an Olympic season.
If she didn’t dope this would have been a mere formality.
Is it your theory that analyzing a doped sample takes six weeks?
I don’t care how long it takes. If she was clean there wouldn’t be anything to worry about. Russia knew and thought they could get away with it. They still might.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You could name a few countries that have something at stake here, but Sweden isn’t one of them.
I await your theory on why it took a Swedish lab six weeks to deliver test results of an Olympic favorite in an Olympic season.
If she didn’t dope this would have been a mere formality.
Is it your theory that analyzing a doped sample takes six weeks?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Couldn't care less. I'm disgusted it's in China.
Same. I won’t watch it. It’s just not what it used to be anyway.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You could name a few countries that have something at stake here, but Sweden isn’t one of them.
I await your theory on why it took a Swedish lab six weeks to deliver test results of an Olympic favorite in an Olympic season.
If she didn’t dope this would have been a mere formality.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Figure skater Jason Brown is a beautiful skater. Stick to triples. I’d rather watch a well executed, perfect routine with no wobbles, falls, etc. Tired of all the Quadruple stuff that rarely come off smoothly.
That’s what Stars on Ice is for, but the Olympics is meant to push the limits of what is possible. Faster, higher, stronger. Jason is a great skater but he is not the most artistic. I feel his scores reflect fondness for him, but I would have much rather seen Ilia compete at the Olympics.
+1,000
If anything Jason is underscored. As a former skater I have to say that aside from the jumps what Jason does is harder then what everyone else is doing. No one else has his edge quality or his mastery of the blade. We are just in a world now where jumps are so heavily valued and the sport is off balance.
"Aside from the hardest thing to do in his discipline, which he doesn't do, he does very hard things."
This very much has the feel of, "So, other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you enjoy the play?"
This. Whether you like them or not and agree with them or not, the technical standards for being an internationally competitive figure skater exist and are very unlikely to change.
Brown skated well (though I do feel like I’ve seen him do that program better and with more emotion, including at Nationals), but he skated a 2005 program in 2022. He’s very lucky to be even in the top 10, thanks to other skaters’ falls.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You could name a few countries that have something at stake here, but Sweden isn’t one of them.
I await your theory on why it took a Swedish lab six weeks to deliver test results of an Olympic favorite in an Olympic season.
Anonymous wrote:
You could name a few countries that have something at stake here, but Sweden isn’t one of them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP here and I agree- but I guess that goes along with what I was saying that I have doubts whether the responsible adults will face any consequences. If Kamila gets banned but Russia carries on with their antics, then the other skaters aren't getting protected either and we're back for waiting for a screwup/positive test. Would WADA, the IOC, etc. be able to investigate the club further, or would that only come from Russia (which we know would never happen). Like someone should really be taking hair samples from the other skaters.
Right now only the RUSADA is investigating her coaching staff, which is meaningless. The IOC press briefing mentioned that they would be looking at her entourage, but I also get the sense that they rather stay out of it. Maybe the US will prosecute her coaching staff, but they may drop it if they get their gold team medal.
I don't suppose anyone is interested in why the lab took from Dec 25 to Feb 8 to report the results of the test? Like, right after the skate but before the medal ceremony? That's hell of a coincidence. And it really doesn't take THAT long to test a pee jar.
There was a backlog due to a COVID outbreak, and figure skaters aren't high priority for testing. I think the only reason they ran it when they did was because she had just medaled, and needed to be cleared.
Supposedly the backlog was due to covid and the fact taht figure skaters aren’t much thought to be at risk of doping. They were bumped to the front of the line after winning the team gold.
Sorry, no, doesn't hold water.
+1 - that's bull. The result was very clearly withheld to put her/Russia in the exact situation it is in now.
Do you mean they withheld the results so that the entire world would be aware tha the Russian athletes continue to cheat? Maybe.
Do you have a theory as to why it took a Swedish lab until Feb 8 to process a sample submitted on Dec 25? You have to agree the timing stinks. To get the results AFTER she skates but BEFORE the medal ceremony?
You could name a few countries that have something at stake here, but Sweden isn’t one of them.
I'm more interested in the child abuse and cheating angles than painting Russia as a victim.
PP you are responding to. Sorry if I wasn't clear, but I do not think Russia is a victim. I think the test results were deliberately withheld so that Valieva could start Olympic competition and forcing the IOC to make a hasty decision while playing up that she's only 15, etc.
I absolutely believe this is grossly abusive on the part of her coach/Russia.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP here and I agree- but I guess that goes along with what I was saying that I have doubts whether the responsible adults will face any consequences. If Kamila gets banned but Russia carries on with their antics, then the other skaters aren't getting protected either and we're back for waiting for a screwup/positive test. Would WADA, the IOC, etc. be able to investigate the club further, or would that only come from Russia (which we know would never happen). Like someone should really be taking hair samples from the other skaters.
Right now only the RUSADA is investigating her coaching staff, which is meaningless. The IOC press briefing mentioned that they would be looking at her entourage, but I also get the sense that they rather stay out of it. Maybe the US will prosecute her coaching staff, but they may drop it if they get their gold team medal.
I don't suppose anyone is interested in why the lab took from Dec 25 to Feb 8 to report the results of the test? Like, right after the skate but before the medal ceremony? That's hell of a coincidence. And it really doesn't take THAT long to test a pee jar.
There was a backlog due to a COVID outbreak, and figure skaters aren't high priority for testing. I think the only reason they ran it when they did was because she had just medaled, and needed to be cleared.
Sorry, no, doesn't hold water.
+1 - that's bull. The result was very clearly withheld to put her/Russia in the exact situation it is in now.
I'm more interesting in the child abuse and cheating angles than painting Russia as a victim.
PP you are responding to. Sorry if I wasn't clear, but I do not think Russia is a victim. I think the test results were deliberately withheld so that Valieva could start Olympic competition and forcing the IOC to make a hasty decision while playing up that she's only 15, etc.
I absolutely believe this is grossly abusive on the part of her coach/Russia.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP here and I agree- but I guess that goes along with what I was saying that I have doubts whether the responsible adults will face any consequences. If Kamila gets banned but Russia carries on with their antics, then the other skaters aren't getting protected either and we're back for waiting for a screwup/positive test. Would WADA, the IOC, etc. be able to investigate the club further, or would that only come from Russia (which we know would never happen). Like someone should really be taking hair samples from the other skaters.
Right now only the RUSADA is investigating her coaching staff, which is meaningless. The IOC press briefing mentioned that they would be looking at her entourage, but I also get the sense that they rather stay out of it. Maybe the US will prosecute her coaching staff, but they may drop it if they get their gold team medal.
I don't suppose anyone is interested in why the lab took from Dec 25 to Feb 8 to report the results of the test? Like, right after the skate but before the medal ceremony? That's hell of a coincidence. And it really doesn't take THAT long to test a pee jar.
There was a backlog due to a COVID outbreak, and figure skaters aren't high priority for testing. I think the only reason they ran it when they did was because she had just medaled, and needed to be cleared.
Sorry, no, doesn't hold water.
+1 - that's bull. The result was very clearly withheld to put her/Russia in the exact situation it is in now.
I'm more interesting in the child abuse and cheating angles than painting Russia as a victim.