Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:419 D1 GA Commits
Hey these teams need to fill rosters too!
Most of the schools on that list are HBCUs, but I guess you knew that, Klanman.
nah, i just listed the bottom of D1, I can easily move up 10 teams - they need players too
These teams also need your GA players
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I see in the post that GA has added 2 new teams.
Carolina Core - girls club ranking/strength #507
KC Legends - girls club ranking/strength #214
yikes...
If you remove the 07/08 (1100 ranking) team which wont be around next season. What is the new math?
The younger teams 2012 and younger are pretty solid
and what if a dingo ran out in the street and ate your baby? what if's... lmao..GA hats crack me
What if an ecnl team plays pipeline? Does that count for anything?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I see in the post that GA has added 2 new teams.
Carolina Core - girls club ranking/strength #507
KC Legends - girls club ranking/strength #214
yikes...
If you remove the 07/08 (1100 ranking) team which wont be around next season. What is the new math?
The younger teams 2012 and younger are pretty solid
and what if a dingo ran out in the street and ate your baby? what if's... lmao..GA hats crack me
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:419 D1 GA Commits
Hey these teams need to fill rosters too!
Most of the schools on that list are HBCUs, but I guess you knew that, Klanman.
nah, i just listed the bottom of D1, I can easily move up 10 teams - they need players too

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:419 D1 GA Commits
Hey these teams need to fill rosters too!
Most of the schools on that list are HBCUs, but I guess you knew that, Klanman.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I see in the post that GA has added 2 new teams.
Carolina Core - girls club ranking/strength #507
KC Legends - girls club ranking/strength #214
yikes...
If you remove the 07/08 (1100 ranking) team which wont be around next season. What is the new math?
The younger teams 2012 and younger are pretty solid
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I see in the post that GA has added 2 new teams.
Carolina Core - girls club ranking/strength #507
KC Legends - girls club ranking/strength #214
yikes...
Again with the rankings. There’s a sucker born every day.
Anonymous wrote:I see in the post that GA has added 2 new teams.
Carolina Core - girls club ranking/strength #507
KC Legends - girls club ranking/strength #214
yikes...
Anonymous wrote:I see in the post that GA has added 2 new teams.
Carolina Core - girls club ranking/strength #507
KC Legends - girls club ranking/strength #214
yikes...
Anonymous wrote:I see in the post that GA has added 2 new teams.
Carolina Core - girls club ranking/strength #507
KC Legends - girls club ranking/strength #214
yikes...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
How significantly will Pipeline Soccer Club be affected by Coppermine securing MLS NEXT Homegrown status? I think it could substantially weaken their position, and their brand may gradually lose relevance—even with their high‑end Capelli uniforms lol. I don’t feel much sympathy for Pipeline SC, because they had a clear opportunity to move out of ECNL and transition into MLS NEXT and GA, but they waited a year too long.
And Arlington—if you’re paying attention—you might want to learn from this. Waiting too long to make the jump can come back to haunt you. Keep an eye on what’s happening in the Baltimore area; it’s a perfect example of what happens when a club hesitates while others move forward.
And MLSN hasn't even started to flex on MLSN clubs with ECNL Girls getting them to switch to GA which we all know is coming.
Again arguing from the boys side. No reason why GA is intrinsically better itself, but if you care more about the boys…
Why would MLSN care about the split clubs? They already have the boys teams.
Mostly because of this...
MLS NEXT Announces Strategic Alliance with Girls Academy to Enhance Player Development and Grow the Sport in North America
https://www.mlssoccer.com/news/mls-next-announces-strategic-alliance-with-girls-academy-to-enhance-player-development-and-grow-the-sport-in-north-america
The partnership article from 2024?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:if by solid you mean none of their age groups were even close to winning the Midwest Conference then yes, they are definitely solid. The move just proved the case that the most dominant GA clubs are just middle of the pack ECNL clubs. The GA is still a second tier developmental league.
100% truff but the GA cult will still huff and puff and prance around like the ECNL is on its last leg
New tactic. We don't have to huff and puff any more. We just sit by and wait quietly as the ECNL world slowly looses steam and much like a frog being boiled to death without realizing it, we are just watching the overly confident parents, continue to stay where they are at and say, "everything is fine. This is fine."
I have no dog in this fight and frankly would prefer to have two competitive options on the girls side, but think this is a little bit of a pipe dream when GA is a girls league and its best selling point is access to a boys league. MLSN may create some hydraulic pressure for GA but GA needs to step up its game in its own right for this to happen. Right now, if ECNL ever feels the pressure they can just let go of the requirement to have both sides in the league. Right now I think they are happy to be smaller and more “elite” (shall we say) while evidence suggests GA is over expanding beyond the talent pool of you look at the disparity from the top to bottom of the tables, at least in the mid-Atlantic. No one want to be in a “national” level league where half your game are uncompetitive blow outs.
ECNL has significantly more teams than GA does. Elite yes, but smaller no. There are plenty of trash ECNL teams out there across the country
no it doesn't. they are pretty even, maybe 1 or 2 difference. stop spreading disinformation