Anonymous wrote:I'm not seeing any of the college outcomes frankly being that different between the top five schools in FCPS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We would choose one where the HS is NOT high performing (e.g., not Oakton, Langley, Mclean). Our kids will do well in any HS. They likely will be closer to top of the class at a mundane HS (because less competition) and that will help with college admissions.
Most people on DCUM will disagree with this.
100% with you here. And that is exactly how it panned out. The group of high performing kids at our low performing HS all got into Stanford, Carnegie-Mellon, Columbia, Duke, Penn, UVA, etc. They had a huge advantage.
But will they do well once they are there? Are they well prepared?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We would choose one where the HS is NOT high performing (e.g., not Oakton, Langley, Mclean). Our kids will do well in any HS. They likely will be closer to top of the class at a mundane HS (because less competition) and that will help with college admissions.
Most people on DCUM will disagree with this.
100% with you here. And that is exactly how it panned out. The group of high performing kids at our low performing HS all got into Stanford, Carnegie-Mellon, Columbia, Duke, Penn, UVA, etc. They had a huge advantage.
But will they do well once they are there? Are they well prepared?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We would choose one where the HS is NOT high performing (e.g., not Oakton, Langley, Mclean). Our kids will do well in any HS. They likely will be closer to top of the class at a mundane HS (because less competition) and that will help with college admissions.
Most people on DCUM will disagree with this.
100% with you here. And that is exactly how it panned out. The group of high performing kids at our low performing HS all got into Stanford, Carnegie-Mellon, Columbia, Duke, Penn, UVA, etc. They had a huge advantage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We would choose one where the HS is NOT high performing (e.g., not Oakton, Langley, Mclean). Our kids will do well in any HS. They likely will be closer to top of the class at a mundane HS (because less competition) and that will help with college admissions.
Most people on DCUM will disagree with this.
100% with you here. And that is exactly how it panned out. The group of high performing kids at our low performing HS all got into Stanford, Carnegie-Mellon, Columbia, Duke, Penn, UVA, etc. They had a huge advantage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We would choose one where the HS is NOT high performing (e.g., not Oakton, Langley, Mclean). Our kids will do well in any HS. They likely will be closer to top of the class at a mundane HS (because less competition) and that will help with college admissions.
Most people on DCUM will disagree with this.
Eh, I wouldn't put too much weight on your theory. At the end of the day, your kid is still an "FCPS grad" and colleges have plenty of over-acheiving "FCPS grads" to choose from.
Also, I'd take a close look at the courses offered at the lower (mundane) HS verses higher achieving one's. Not sure you can get the same academic vigor .
Anonymous wrote:We would choose one where the HS is NOT high performing (e.g., not Oakton, Langley, Mclean). Our kids will do well in any HS. They likely will be closer to top of the class at a mundane HS (because less competition) and that will help with college admissions.
Most people on DCUM will disagree with this.
Anonymous wrote:That’s Falls Church City!Anonymous wrote:Meridian
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:this is an interesting point!Anonymous wrote:We would choose one where the HS is NOT high performing (e.g., not Oakton, Langley, Mclean). Our kids will do well in any HS. They likely will be closer to top of the class at a mundane HS (because less competition) and that will help with college admissions.
Most people on DCUM will disagree with this.
We moved from an average FCPS pyramid to a top pyramid. The difference in what teachers and staff expected of students was quickly apparent.
You can bet that other kids at an average or below average school will make your kids look better, or conclude that a strong peer group will better prepare your kids for what comes next.
Talk is cheap on DCUM, but when you look at actual behavior as reflected real estate prices, it's clear people tend to believe the latter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Chantilly via any of the ES and Rocky Run
I would not recommend Chantilly. Rocky is ok.
I'm with you. It has good educational outcomes because the parents are so invested in making sure that the mediocre teaching does not impact their kids.
Are you talking about Chantilly or Rocky Run with mediocre teachers?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Chantilly via any of the ES and Rocky Run
I would not recommend Chantilly. Rocky is ok.
I'm with you. It has good educational outcomes because the parents are so invested in making sure that the mediocre teaching does not impact their kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm not seeing any of the college outcomes frankly being that different between the top five schools in FCPS.
What would you consider the top 5? Langley, McLean, Oakton, Woodson, and ?