Anonymous wrote:Teachers got their contracts. The delay sucked but it’s water under the bridge now.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those salaries seem entirely reasonable and actually less than I would have expected.

Right. There are just too many administrative positions for a school of this size. There's definitely fat to be cut. The key question here is: if these salaries are so reasonable, isn't that even more reason to question why the school can't operate normally? Not only should faculty have been secure in knowing their jobs were safe for next year at least a month ago, they should not have to be strung along each year while they wait for "offer letters" that may not come. This is NOT how teachers should be treated, and I don't care if "everyone else is doing it" or "that's just the way things are." Ok, well they shouldn't be that way. Teachers should be the priority at any functional school, and the fact that they aren't at this point is a very, very bad sign.

Any school worth it's salt should be able to attract new students and endear itself to existing ones through word of mouth. This one doesn't seem to be able to. It isn't a demographic cliff or Covid bump or whatever amorphous force driving declining enrollment. That's just deflection. It stems from ineffective, reactionary, and, in many cases, mean-spirited leadership that has cut the heart out of what used to endear people to Lowell. Legendary faculty who had been there for years? Cut out at the knees. Innovative curriculum that could have inspired WaPo articles or institutes devoted to progressive educational models? In the garbage can. Long-term families who could have acted as generational ambassadors and inspire generational giving? Antagonized and pushed out. Lowell has a choice now. It can continue on its current trajectory or it could take all of this as a flashing red warning, clean house, and bring in new leaders that actually know what a school's priorities should be.

Anonymous wrote:My kid is going to Lowell for summer camp this year and I went to the camp open house. I wasn't expecting a full court press on Lowell admissions, but I got one.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I didn't realize that private school teachers had a new employment contract each years, seems stressful. I knew they were at-will, I just figured they were let go if there were problems or a school shut down. I never thought about the idea of laying off some teachers. Though I could see schools laying off admin staff if needed sometimes.

Yes, private school teachers are extremely vulnerable to administrations that are abusive or incompetent. I wish boards and parents listened more careful to teacher concerns about leadership.

This right here. It is imperative that boards have a system in place to check in with faculty on an annual basis. Switch out Lowell for a handful of other DMV schools and the same issues exist: institutions being held together by their incredibly talented and overworked faculty while mediocre leadership circles the drain until someone breaks. It’s happening every day and parents are funding it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I didn't realize that private school teachers had a new employment contract each years, seems stressful. I knew they were at-will, I just figured they were let go if there were problems or a school shut down. I never thought about the idea of laying off some teachers. Though I could see schools laying off admin staff if needed sometimes.

Yes, private school teachers are extremely vulnerable to administrations that are abusive or incompetent. I wish boards and parents listened more careful to teacher concerns about leadership.

Anonymous wrote:Why would anyone on this board know an answer to this question that even the Lowell employees don’t know?

Anonymous wrote:Well there is the demographic cliff thing. I imagine they are not the only elementary school struggling.

Anonymous wrote:I didn't realize that private school teachers had a new employment contract each years, seems stressful. I knew they were at-will, I just figured they were let go if there were problems or a school shut down. I never thought about the idea of laying off some teachers. Though I could see schools laying off admin staff if needed sometimes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Teachers are Lowell’s greatest asset. My child and I have been waiting to have a particular teacher, so the idea that teachers are “nice” instead of “necessary” is disappointing. It’s a wonder folks are jumping ship and enrollment is down.

This HoS has treated Lowell teachers like trash since the second she walked in the door. She is mean, incompetent, and has been driving the school into the ground for years. Many, MANY incredibly talented teachers have been bullied out by this person who has no business being within 500 miles of a school. Her definition of “necessary” is to keep the people who will lick her boots and preserve her control while ditching the best ones whom she sees as a risk to her power.