Anonymous wrote:someone should doAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Great! Maybe they will graduate and stay in the US and coach our Club teams. Then WE can field better developed players.
If these kids were superstars they'd be in their home countries playing professionally at some level. Believe it.
But they are better than the US kids?
Yes, they are better than US kids. And I don't mind the best kids coming here to play soccer, tennis or any sport if they are paying full tuition rates, like most international students who are paying full tuition. But when a public college pays international students to play a sport, they are using public money (my tax dollars, your tax dollars) to fund that student, rather than an American student. And that I am not ok with
The American thing and sue
someone should doAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Great! Maybe they will graduate and stay in the US and coach our Club teams. Then WE can field better developed players.
If these kids were superstars they'd be in their home countries playing professionally at some level. Believe it.
But they are better than the US kids?
Yes, they are better than US kids. And I don't mind the best kids coming here to play soccer, tennis or any sport if they are paying full tuition rates, like most international students who are paying full tuition. But when a public college pays international students to play a sport, they are using public money (my tax dollars, your tax dollars) to fund that student, rather than an American student. And that I am not ok with
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Great! Maybe they will graduate and stay in the US and coach our Club teams. Then WE can field better developed players.
If these kids were superstars they'd be in their home countries playing professionally at some level. Believe it.
But they are better than the US kids?
Anonymous wrote:Is there a political divide on this issue? If the percentage of in-state undergrads at a public school kept decreasing every year, then the public and state representatives would surely do something about it. Why are non-revenue sports different?
Missouri State is not a professional team. What's the point of having their soccer team represented by zero players from Missouri?
And yes, this applies to every other state school. I would rather watch a UMD team that is mediocre but has 50% players from Bethesda, Celtic, Armour, Pipeline, etc.. than a Budesliga 4 team made up of players who didn't know Maryland existed before coming here.
Anonymous wrote:I’m happy my son is only 7
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Great! Maybe they will graduate and stay in the US and coach our Club teams. Then WE can field better developed players.
If these kids were superstars they'd be in their home countries playing professionally at some level. Believe it.
Good point. The losers of Germany are still better than your MLS Next pretty boy.
Then they can play MLS pro. But this is college sports. COLLEGE. WTF?!
Anonymous wrote:I’m happy my son is only 7
Anonymous wrote:To previous poster who mentioned tennis, this is correct and becoming more common. No team is winning the D1 championship without some foreign players.
I played D1 tennis in the late 80s and we had two foreign players on our roster and my experience was that much better with them on the team.
I am all for non US players on rosters, but I believe there should be a limit. Fewer and fewer kids in the US are pursuing college tennis because they know they are competing against the world for a roster spot.
The last point I will make is from the point of view of a college coach. Foreign players are usually more mature and more reliable. They have tried playing professionally and didn't work out. They don't come here to join frats and party. They come to train hard, play hard, and get a degree, and many want to stay here. Some serve assistant coaches and get grad degrees. I am all for that.
For the sport of soccer, some become your ecnl coaches !
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a 2013G and still think you're stirring sh*t up for no reason. This has nothing to do with "open borders". You're just parroting dumb talking points where they do not apply at all.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This has absolutely nothing to do with "open borders", but recent topic expert is here to stir some s**t up
Truth hurts, did I strike a nerve. And yes, have a 2013B on a NOVA club. Sorry, nice try though.
Yep, struck a nerve
Anonymous wrote:I have a 2013G and still think you're stirring sh*t up for no reason. This has nothing to do with "open borders". You're just parroting dumb talking points where they do not apply at all.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This has absolutely nothing to do with "open borders", but recent topic expert is here to stir some s**t up
Truth hurts, did I strike a nerve. And yes, have a 2013B on a NOVA club. Sorry, nice try though.
Anonymous wrote:Missouri State will be the first D1 school to have a full international roster, no American kids. If you thought the transfer portal and NIL were ruining college football and basketball, it is nothing compared to mens soccer.
https://www.nationalsoccernetwork.com/post/missouri-state-becomes-first-known-ncaa-program-built-entirely-on-international-talent?srsltid=AfmBOorH8JdnO6v2QYx4OwwcsspHkLoM4KllD4kmcGiWEWGd-lE9CbMh