Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This happens quite often with high academic student athletes choosing a Top 10 or Top 20 option over D2 and/or D3 offer(s)
Forgot to add: if your child is interested in a difficult major (think, pre-med or engineering) and/or studying abroad, the possibility of playing a major D1 team sport is really unusual. If both (rigorous major AND study abroad), I’m not sure any D1 program would allow them to do that - in my experience, they wouldn’t be a viable recruit in most, if not all team sports. There’s just too little time to accomplish all of those goals.
Anonymous wrote:My kid and many of her friends at UVA made the same decision. Is the grind really worth it, if they end up a lower academic universities just to play their sport?
Why didn't she recruit to her ED school? Was it D1?Anonymous wrote:Yes. My daughter was recruitable at several top LACs but decided to ED to another school based on her broader interests. She was top 10 percent in her graduating class, high rigor, 1590 SAT, NMSF, strong ECs (besides sport). No regrets: got accepted and will play club.
If your kids is bright and recruit material, they should just find an Ivy or academic d3 they like and target it.Anonymous wrote:Learning a lot about recruiting and college process. Did anyone's child decide not to play based on where they were recruited? My kid is extremely bright and not sure the stars will align, especially having to commit before all acceptances come through.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes. DD was a 4-year Varsity athlete. She was even a section-leader her senior year, which is important to demonstrate leadership.
She earned admission to a public Ivy, but won’t be pursuing her sport in college.
Academics come first.
What is a public ivy?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It goes both ways. Over this weekend at my DS's well regarded private school, the best senior on the boys soccer team, who is strong academically, committed to a regional D3 public university to keep playing. My mind was blown.
That’s really common in boy’s soccer. Most of the commits you see in the area aren’t top schools. Those schools are near impossible for a 17-18 year old American kid. Some rosters are all international, transfer portal players.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It goes both ways. Over this weekend at my DS's well regarded private school, the best senior on the boys soccer team, who is strong academically, committed to a regional D3 public university to keep playing. My mind was blown.
That’s really common in boy’s soccer. Most of the commits you see in the area aren’t top schools. Those schools are near impossible for a 17-18 year old American kid. Some rosters are all international, transfer portal players.
Anonymous wrote:It goes both ways. Over this weekend at my DS's well regarded private school, the best senior on the boys soccer team, who is strong academically, committed to a regional D3 public university to keep playing. My mind was blown.
Anonymous wrote:It goes both ways. Over this weekend at my DS's well regarded private school, the best senior on the boys soccer team, who is strong academically, committed to a regional D3 public university to keep playing. My mind was blown.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes. DD was a 4-year Varsity athlete. She was even a section-leader her senior year, which is important to demonstrate leadership.
She earned admission to a public Ivy, but won’t be pursuing her sport in college.
Academics come first.
What is a public ivy?
It’s a made up term that sounds ridiculous to others when someone employs it. They mean UVA, Michigan, maybe Berkeley. [/quote
This sounds ridiculous. I just googled it and see it was a phrase from the 1980s! Just say "state flagship" because it sounds so try-hard to say "public ivy" let alone say "she earned admission to a public ivy." The only reason to say that is to try and portray more prestige than otherwise exists for that school. Not dissing these schools at all but it just sounds ridiculous to use this term. (It's like saying "my kid is a doctor-lite" when the kid is a physician's assistant. Nothing wrong at all with being a PA, but to make it sound more than it is sounds insufferable)!!
Anonymous wrote:My student had offers from D3s and tiny D1s as an athlete. Academically, she was accepted to multiple T30 “sweatshirt” schools. Ultimately, she decided on one of those and has no regrets. Her school’s club and intermural teams are full of kids who were in the same situation. She received merit aid from her school and is playing sports for fun while majoring in engineering.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This happens quite often with high academic student athletes choosing a Top 10 or Top 20 option over D2 and/or D3 offer(s)
Forgot to add: if your child is interested in a difficult major (think, pre-med or engineering) and/or studying abroad, the possibility of playing a major D1 team sport is really unusual. If both (rigorous major AND study abroad), I’m not sure any D1 program would allow them to do that - in my experience, they wouldn’t be a viable recruit in most, if not all team sports. There’s just too little time to accomplish all of those goals.
Anonymous wrote:I think there is definitely kids who could play at a D3 or lower tier D1 who choose to go to a "better" school (could be better fit, better academics, better major, whatever) and not do the sport.
In my DD's friend group- there is only one athlete who has an opportunity to go to a top school for athletics and academics. The rest is kind of a mix of being able to play club at Virginia Tech vs playing at College of Wooster (nothing against Wooster but the kid would prefer VT)