Anonymous wrote:Given FCPS’s ongoing decline and commitment to mediocrity recognizing the local kids who still are in the top 3% is the least we should do.

Reid and the hyper-progressive school board are running FCPS into the ground. Sad to see the decline of the once-great FCPS.
Sent from my iPhone

Anonymous wrote:Note: Students who have a signed opt-out form on file are not listed.

Very few would opt out of being recognized for academic achievement. It’s not like a Family Life presentation in elementary school.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The NMSQT is a flawed system in that the index used to score it is calculated by doubling the Reading score and adding it to the Math score and dividing by 10 which disproportionately favors students who are stronger in their verbal skills than their math skills. It is also taken at the beginning of their junior year but not awarded until the beginning of senior year - a full year later.

Being a National Merit Finalist or Semifinalist doesn't even accurately reflect which students have achieved the greatest overall success on the SAT.

DS did not achieve even Commended status on the NMSQT, but went on to get the highest SAT score in his graduating class including a perfect score on the Math section. It's definitely a nice recognition for the students who score high on the PSAT (especially in Reading) but really is not necessarily indicative of those who are the highest achieving in the SATs in terms of the college admissions process.

Nice anecdote. Scary you'd pretend to know the SAT scores of all the kids in his graduating class.

Just because your DS didn't get this particular award doesn't mean it's not valid for others.

You don't think the high stat kids at every school compare SAT scores like the kids in the weight room compare how much they can bench press? All the kids in my daughter's school know each others SAT scores. It's also info that is available in the Scattergrams in Naviance.

Note: Students who have a signed opt-out form on file are not listed.

Anonymous wrote:Yes — it is absolutely possible to achieve the same results with free SAT resources as with a paid prep class. Many students score 1500–1600 using only free tools.
The difference is not quality of material — it’s structure, discipline, and feedback.

Which is exactly what the paid prep classes provide…

Anonymous wrote:Jeez, what’s going on at Woodson? Terrible showing.

This is probably wrong. More NMSF than commended? Unlikely.

Anonymous wrote:And people say Chantilly is "bad" or "mediocre."

Nobody says that. That school is packed full of korean immigrants.

Anonymous wrote:This is purely based on PSAT scores being in the top 1% of the state (semifinalist) or top 2-3% (commended).

i.e. this is a metric for who can afford SAT tutoring.

It is a metric of who has developed the most cognitive ability. Money helps with that but is not determinative.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And people say Chantilly is "bad" or "mediocre."

Who says that? Probably only some Oakton parents wanting to stay put.

Chantilly has made its way into the top 5 of non-TJ schools. It now has the role that Woodson used to have - a top school academically but more affordable than the other pyramids in the top 5.

Even those parents who want to stay at Oakton think Chantilly is a good school. Also, Woodson is still a top 5 school…

It really isn’t. Chantilly any Marshall both have stronger claims to be top 5 or 6 now than Woodson.

Chantilly? Maybe. Marshall? No.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Y’all are just obsessed. It’s pathetic.

Or maybe you’re just easily triggered. Facts are facts.

It is considered rude to remind people that their kids are not smart.

Anonymous wrote:The NMSQT is a flawed system in that the index used to score it is calculated by doubling the Reading score and adding it to the Math score and dividing by 10 which disproportionately favors students who are stronger in their verbal skills than their math skills. It is also taken at the beginning of their junior year but not awarded until the beginning of senior year - a full year later.

Being a National Merit Finalist or Semifinalist doesn't even accurately reflect which students have achieved the greatest overall success on the SAT.

DS did not achieve even Commended status on the NMSQT, but went on to get the highest SAT score in his graduating class including a perfect score on the Math section. It's definitely a nice recognition for the students who score high on the PSAT (especially in Reading) but really is not necessarily indicative of those who are the highest achieving in the SATs in terms of the college admissions process.

Nice anecdote. Scary you'd pretend to know the SAT scores of all the kids in his graduating class.

Just because your DS didn't get this particular award doesn't mean it's not valid for others.

The NMSQT is a flawed system in that the index used to score it is calculated by doubling the Reading score and adding it to the Math score and dividing by 10 which disproportionately favors students who are stronger in their verbal skills than their math skills. It is also taken at the beginning of their junior year but not awarded until the beginning of senior year - a full year later.

Being a National Merit Finalist or Semifinalist doesn't even accurately reflect which students have achieved the greatest overall success on the SAT.

DS did not achieve even Commended status on the NMSQT, but went on to get the highest SAT score in his graduating class including a perfect score on the Math section. It's definitely a nice recognition for the students who score high on the PSAT (especially in Reading) but really is not necessarily indicative of those who are the highest achieving in the SATs in terms of the college admissions process.

Evidence (real-world truth)
• Khan Academy users see 100–140 point average gains (College Board data)
• Many National Merit semifinalists use only free resources
• Public-school students regularly outscore private-prep students when disciplined

Free prep can fully match paid prep if these conditions are met:

1️⃣ You use official material
• Khan Academy + College Board practice tests = same content logic used on the real SAT
• Paid companies cannot access “better” questions than College Board

➡️ There is no secret content behind paywalls.

⸻

2️⃣ You do deep error analysis

High scorers don’t just practice — they:
• Track why every wrong answer happened
• Categorize mistakes (concept gap, misread, rushed, trap answer)
• Redo missed questions days later

Paid classes force this; free prep requires self-discipline.

⸻

3️⃣ You practice under real test conditions
• Timed sections
• No pauses
• Same calculator rules
• Same digital format

Free official tests already provide this.

⸻

4️⃣ You follow a consistent plan

Paid classes mainly provide:
• Schedule
• Accountability
• Motivation

Those can be recreated for free with:
• Weekly goals
• Parent check-ins
• Error log spreadsheets
• Khan Academy’s adaptive plan

Yes — it is absolutely possible to achieve the same results with free SAT resources as with a paid prep class. Many students score 1500–1600 using only free tools.
The difference is not quality of material — it’s structure, discipline, and feedback.