Anonymous wrote:Trump accidentally did something decent.
Federal loans don't pay for college. They pay for the country club experience. Important core education for the nation comes at our community colleges and instate colleges. Cutting funding for private school and OOS country clubs frees up education money for education.
Anonymous wrote:Trump accidentally did something decent.
Federal loans don't pay for college. They pay for the country club experience. Important core education for the nation comes at our community colleges and instate colleges. Cutting funding for private school and OOS country clubs frees up education money for education.
Anonymous wrote:On face value, the idea of forcing students to consider the return on investment for a degree should be bipartisan. Tying the ability to get any federal loans to that seems like a hard line and I feel like there’s another policy solution. When neither side trusts the other and the assumption is that changes like this are part of a broader attack on colleges it really limits any real discussion.
Anonymous wrote:So these majors will be the new markers of the wealthy and elite? Because they'll be the only ones who can afford to take humanities, fine arts and social sciences?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Why should taxpayers pay for poor educational choices young adults are making? Why aren’t parents guiding their children to make financially responsible decisions?"
Because until now we lived in the United States of America where Americans had freedom to chose to go into debt.
If you want to live under a dictatorship then we are no longer the US.
Trump wants more Trump Universities that's his goal nothing more nothing less. It's all about the money flowing to him.
Students can still take on plenty of debt. It just won’t be federally provided. The private sector can fill that niche just fine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are idiots if we starve the liberal arts. The obsession with creating worker bees for companies instead of fostering a well-rounded education is bonkers.
This
That’s not what the proposal is about. It’s about terminating useless degrees at $100k a year schools that end up with salaries less than a high school graduate. Go back and read the actual proposal. My expensive “psych”undergrad degree at a $$ SLAC was worthless
How was it worthless? There is such high need for Psychologists, no?
Actually, psych degrees are the prime example of low ROI.
Psychologists actually need a doctoral degree to be a psychologist. Just majoring in psychology isn't enough.
A PP. I have experience in the market research field. That's a reasonably in-demand, reasonably-compensated liberal arts degree holder profession. It is common that entry-level staff have psychology degrees or minors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are idiots if we starve the liberal arts. The obsession with creating worker bees for companies instead of fostering a well-rounded education is bonkers.
This
That’s not what the proposal is about. It’s about terminating useless degrees at $100k a year schools that end up with salaries less than a high school graduate. Go back and read the actual proposal. My expensive “psych”undergrad degree at a $$ SLAC was worthless
How was it worthless? There is such high need for Psychologists, no?
Actually, psych degrees are the prime example of low ROI.
Psychologists actually need a doctoral degree to be a psychologist. Just majoring in psychology isn't enough.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are idiots if we starve the liberal arts. The obsession with creating worker bees for companies instead of fostering a well-rounded education is bonkers.
This
That’s not what the proposal is about. It’s about terminating useless degrees at $100k a year schools that end up with salaries less than a high school graduate. Go back and read the actual proposal. My expensive “psych”undergrad degree at a $$ SLAC was worthless
How was it worthless? There is such high need for Psychologists, no?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Federal loans part of the reason why college tuitions are skyrocketing. So good move!
Will college tuition come down??
Anonymous wrote:We are idiots if we starve the liberal arts. The obsession with creating worker bees for companies instead of fostering a well-rounded education is bonkers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are idiots if we starve the liberal arts. The obsession with creating worker bees for companies instead of fostering a well-rounded education is bonkers.
This
That’s not what the proposal is about. It’s about terminating useless degrees at $100k a year schools that end up with salaries less than a high school graduate. Go back and read the actual proposal. My expensive “psych”undergrad degree at a $$ SLAC was worthless