Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is difference we saw with our kids…one graduated from an avg well known but not elite flagship state U. (Still a t100) The other graduated from IE in Madrid….The state U kid had opportunities for jobs…but they were all local/regional smaller companies with zero chance to branch out to a bigger well known position in big US cities…. My IE kid had a world of opportunities in front of him. Interned in Switzerland and then Paris and had 3 job offers in 3 different countries and took the one back in the US. He is in NYC now.
Now you’re just making stuff up…
Ok. Go ahead and compare OU to IE…..
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is difference we saw with our kids…one graduated from an avg well known but not elite flagship state U. (Still a t100) The other graduated from IE in Madrid….The state U kid had opportunities for jobs…but they were all local/regional smaller companies with zero chance to branch out to a bigger well known position in big US cities…. My IE kid had a world of opportunities in front of him. Interned in Switzerland and then Paris and had 3 job offers in 3 different countries and took the one back in the US. He is in NYC now.
Now you’re just making stuff up…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is difference we saw with our kids…one graduated from an avg well known but not elite flagship state U. (Still a t100) The other graduated from IE in Madrid….The state U kid had opportunities for jobs…but they were all local/regional smaller companies with zero chance to branch out to a bigger well known position in big US cities…. My IE kid had a world of opportunities in front of him. Interned in Switzerland and then Paris and had 3 job offers in 3 different countries and took the one back in the US. He is in NYC now.
Now you’re just making stuff up…
Anonymous wrote:This is difference we saw with our kids…one graduated from an avg well known but not elite flagship state U. (Still a t100) The other graduated from IE in Madrid….The state U kid had opportunities for jobs…but they were all local/regional smaller companies with zero chance to branch out to a bigger well known position in big US cities…. My IE kid had a world of opportunities in front of him. Interned in Switzerland and then Paris and had 3 job offers in 3 different countries and took the one back in the US. He is in NYC now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the purpose of enrolling to a European school? Save money on tuition, international exposure?
I wouldn’t do it for the lower tuition alone. If [/b]you plan on returning to US after graduation stick to a school that is well known here. Also the economy, youth employment, internship opportunities are much better in US. There’s a reason the net flux of students is from Europe to US.
For international exposure you can do one semester abroad instead.
True if DC can get into HSY. But a GMU or Directional State U degree is not more marketable than a rando EU university degree.
Top 100 US universities are definitely more marketable in US than random EU universities. We’re talking Tulane, UCs, Rochester etc. nobody here knows or cares about Malmo University.
I’d you don’t plan to return to US you’ll be graduating in a low growth economy with high youth unemployment, but 200k less in debt. Do it at your own risk, I don’t think it’s worth it. Salaries in US, internships and job opportunities more than make up for the difference.
Tulane, yes, Rochester yes.
But do you really think that a North Central Iowa University degree is any more marketable than a Central Madrid University degree?
People who graduate from [b]directional state universities (or the private equivalent) get jobs in spite of their degrees.
What directional state universities are you talking about in Top 100? Maybe University of Southern Florida or University of Central Florida. They are decent colleges, not sure why you look down on them. Curious to see why you think a US kid should choose a European university over them. It’s a different demography anyways, and we’re not talking about kids choosing between them and Oxford/Cambridge.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the purpose of enrolling to a European school? Save money on tuition, international exposure?
I wouldn’t do it for the lower tuition alone. If [/b]you plan on returning to US after graduation stick to a school that is well known here. Also the economy, youth employment, internship opportunities are much better in US. There’s a reason the net flux of students is from Europe to US.
For international exposure you can do one semester abroad instead.
True if DC can get into HSY. But a GMU or Directional State U degree is not more marketable than a rando EU university degree.
Top 100 US universities are definitely more marketable in US than random EU universities. We’re talking Tulane, UCs, Rochester etc. nobody here knows or cares about Malmo University.
I’d you don’t plan to return to US you’ll be graduating in a low growth economy with high youth unemployment, but 200k less in debt. Do it at your own risk, I don’t think it’s worth it. Salaries in US, internships and job opportunities more than make up for the difference.
Tulane, yes, Rochester yes.
But do you really think that a North Central Iowa University degree is any more marketable than a Central Madrid University degree?
People who graduate from [b]directional state universities (or the private equivalent) get jobs in spite of their degrees.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the purpose of enrolling to a European school? Save money on tuition, international exposure?
I wouldn’t do it for the lower tuition alone. If you plan on returning to US after graduation stick to a school that is well known here. Also the economy, youth employment, internship opportunities are much better in US. There’s a reason the net flux of students is from Europe to US.
For international exposure you can do one semester abroad instead.
True if DC can get into HSY. But a GMU or Directional State U degree is not more marketable than a rando EU university degree.
Top 100 US universities are definitely more marketable in US than random EU universities. We’re talking Tulane, UCs, Rochester etc. nobody here knows or cares about Malmo University.
I’d you don’t plan to return to US you’ll be graduating in a low growth economy with high youth unemployment, but 200k less in debt. Do it at your own risk, I don’t think it’s worth it. Salaries in US, internships and job opportunities more than make up for the difference.
Tulane, yes, Rochester yes.
But do you really think that a North Central Iowa University degree is any more marketable than a Central Madrid University degree?
People who graduate from directional state universities (or the private equivalent) get jobs in spite of their degrees.
North Central Iowa University[b] does not exist, but I’d say University of Iowa which is outside of top 100 has more name recognition than Central Madrid University. It also has quite good programs in nursing and engineering and at $12k/year tuition in state is likely a better financial deal too.
Sounds like you didn’t really do your homework.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the purpose of enrolling to a European school? Save money on tuition, international exposure?
I wouldn’t do it for the lower tuition alone. If [/b]you plan on returning to US after graduation stick to a school that is well known here. [b]Also the economy, youth employment, internship opportunities are much better in US. There’s a reason the net flux of students is from Europe to US.
For international exposure you can do one semester abroad instead.
True if DC can get into HSY. But a GMU or Directional State U degree is not more marketable than a rando EU university degree.
Top 100 US universities are definitely more marketable in US than random EU universities. We’re talking Tulane, UCs, Rochester etc. nobody here knows or cares about Malmo University.
I’d you don’t plan to return to US you’ll be graduating in a low growth economy with high youth unemployment, but 200k less in debt. Do it at your own risk, I don’t think it’s worth it. Salaries in US, internships and job opportunities more than make up for the difference.
Tulane, yes, Rochester yes.
But do you really think that a North Central Iowa University degree is any more marketable than a Central Madrid University degree?
People who graduate from directional state universities (or the private equivalent) get jobs in spite of their degrees.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the purpose of enrolling to a European school? Save money on tuition, international exposure?
I wouldn’t do it for the lower tuition alone. If [/b]you plan on returning to US after graduation stick to a school that is well known here. [b]Also the economy, youth employment, internship opportunities are much better in US. There’s a reason the net flux of students is from Europe to US.
For international exposure you can do one semester abroad instead.
True if DC can get into HSY. But a GMU or Directional State U degree is not more marketable than a rando EU university degree.
Top 100 US universities are definitely more marketable in US than random EU universities. We’re talking Tulane, UCs, Rochester etc. nobody here knows or cares about Malmo University.
I’d you don’t plan to return to US you’ll be graduating in a low growth economy with high youth unemployment, but 200k less in debt. Do it at your own risk, I don’t think it’s worth it. Salaries in US, internships and job opportunities more than make up for the difference.
Anonymous wrote:Some Americans we know with EU citizenship have gone to the Netherlands like Maastricht or Utrecht.
Anonymous wrote:Kid graduated from Exeter….(sure not a random as PP said) and yet, got an amazing internship his last year in the US and is now fully employed at an Investment group in Chicago…..and yes….$150k extra in his pocket vs the US T75 private schools no merit he got accepted too….