Anonymous wrote:I would not travel to Colombia: its homicide rate is 24.91 per 100,000 people and GDP per capita is about 7,001 dollars.
Mexico is also a hard no, with a homicide rate of 24.86 per 100,000 even though GDP per capita is about 13,861 dollars.
For comparison, the United States is 5.76 homicides per 100,000 with GDP per capita about 81,032 dollars.
Paris is in France, where the homicide rate is about 1.34 per 100,000 and GDP per capita is about 44,700 dollars, and Rome is in Italy at about 0.57 per 100,000 with GDP per capita about 39,277 dollars.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Colombia has been Level 3 since April, which was presumably before you even made your reservations. It's not new.
To be fair, things have gotten more risky there in the last few days / weeks. More of the country is classified 4 now.
Colombia last week / yesturday was not the Colombia in April.
Are you the friggin OP? The OP made a point of saying she just checked and it's now Level 3. My point is it's long been Level 3. So she shouldn't be making the decision on that basis.
There's no reason not to go to Colombia. None. You all are losing your shit over nothing.
That’s not true. The US currently has an unstable leader who claimed he invaded Venezuela for drugs. Not true, it was for oil.
Trump doesn’t mention Colombia but he is drunk with power and no country in South America is safe. He might decide to go actually go after the drug cartels where most of them are located - Colombia.
My college age daughter is going to Colombia next month with her Colombian born boyfriend who now has dual citizenship. My fear is they won’t let him back to the US even though he’s legal. Rules of law mean nothing anymore under the hateful incompetence of this administration
Anonymous wrote:OP here. I still wanted to go and felt it would be fine the places on our itinerary but my companion did not feel the same. He wanted to cancel the trip so sadly we are not going.
Anonymous wrote:A few days ago, I did a quick internet search which revealed that Colombia was the poorest country in South America. Is this true ?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. I still wanted to go and felt it would be fine the places on our itinerary but my companion did not feel the same. He wanted to cancel the trip so sadly we are not going.
I am the poster above yours. My daughter and her boyfriend are not going to tourist places, they are visiting relatives in relatively rural areas. I wish they would postpone. I hope you and your companion can agree on a more peaceful less worrisome place to vacation. There are too many beautiful places to choose from so that you don’t have to fixate on one country.
Married to a Colombian dual citizen for years. We would definitely travel. Colombia has no oil so Trump has little reason to go there. He also had a weird call with Petro, so seems to be off his list for now...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. I still wanted to go and felt it would be fine the places on our itinerary but my companion did not feel the same. He wanted to cancel the trip so sadly we are not going.
I am the poster above yours. My daughter and her boyfriend are not going to tourist places, they are visiting relatives in relatively rural areas. I wish they would postpone. I hope you and your companion can agree on a more peaceful less worrisome place to vacation. There are too many beautiful places to choose from so that you don’t have to fixate on one country.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. I still wanted to go and felt it would be fine the places on our itinerary but my companion did not feel the same. He wanted to cancel the trip so sadly we are not going.