Anonymous
Post 12/12/2025 09:22     Subject: No more calibri because it is accessible
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:How is it wasteful? Show us the cost breakdown of the switch. And then show us the cost breakdown of switching back.


Cruelty is priceless to this admin.


I hope you are also this vociferous about getting the crazy kids out of elementary school and the violent kids out of middle/high school. Millions of normal kids suffer for over a decade. Or else stop talking about this, which seems to be lacking in actual reporting, i.e., short on statistics but an abundance of trigger words in the reporting.

And if this is so significant, why can't anyone remember that seminal moment in 2023 when the original change occurred?


What?

Anonymous
Post 12/12/2025 09:20     Subject: No more calibri because it is accessible
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Who cares

Idiot, the visually impaired cares.


And, frankly, anyone who supports inclusion and accessibility for all ranges of ability in our society. What's next? Ripping out wheelchair ramps?
Anonymous
Post 12/12/2025 07:25     Subject: Re:No more calibri because it is accessible
Little Marco has embraced The Failing New York Times New Roman font.

partially stolen from reddit
Anonymous
Post 12/12/2025 07:23     Subject: No more calibri because it is accessible
So now deranged Trumpers think FONTS are "woke." Fonts, ffs..

They deserve comic sans. What a clown show.
Anonymous
Post 12/12/2025 02:05     Subject: No more calibri because it is accessible
Each administration changes the style guidelines, its how they communicated this change.
Anonymous
Post 12/12/2025 01:22     Subject: No more calibri because it is accessible
That’s just mean for the sake of being mean. The only joy MAGA can feel nowadays is hurting others.
Anonymous
Post 12/12/2025 00:49     Subject: No more calibri because it is accessible
Anonymous wrote:Not only TNR, but FOURTEEN POINT TNR. As anyone who has reviewed student work can tell you, this is a strategy of amateurs who want to make not much work take up more pages.

Specify 1.25” margins too, Marco!


Marco standing by the ready to impose whatever line spacing and text kerning guidelines his demonic overlords from Tel Aviv dictate next, no doubt.

What a POS. 🤣
Anonymous
Post 12/11/2025 23:36     Subject: Re:No more calibri because it is accessible
Anonymous wrote:I’ve learned after several decades in Legal practice that the people who obsess the most over old fashioned fonts and typing conventions tend to be the weakest on substance and most irrelevant in influence. Gives real “small d” energy.


Yes. Like the new boss who can’t wait to change committee names.

See also: rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.
Anonymous
Post 12/11/2025 21:53     Subject: No more calibri because it is accessible
This is at the forefront of the American conversation.

Today they stood up for Times New Roman!

Tomorrow it will be re-named Times New American by Executive Decree. It will match the strength and integrity of the Great American Straw Executive Order!
Anonymous
Post 12/11/2025 12:15     Subject: No more calibri because it is accessible
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:How is something that has been shown to be better for a wider number of people "woke"? This is like saying we should not have automatic door openers or ramps because they're unattractive and take away from the elegance of a building's architecture. I know it's not precisely the same, but I just can't believe he (Rubio) was stupid enough to share the reason, given that there was no actual cost implication to the change to Calibri. Rubio is a true disappointment - at one time, I really did expect better. But he's increasingly an embarrassment to himself. What did he (or his people) achieve by giving the reason why?

It’s almost like “woke” describes things that are good.


+1
I can see these idiots doing just as you said though. Remove those ramps now! Billions of dollars in construction costs be damned!


What if we keep ramps but end Metro Access? Is that woke enough?
Anonymous
Post 12/11/2025 12:07     Subject: No more calibri because it is accessible
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:How is something that has been shown to be better for a wider number of people "woke"? This is like saying we should not have automatic door openers or ramps because they're unattractive and take away from the elegance of a building's architecture. I know it's not precisely the same, but I just can't believe he (Rubio) was stupid enough to share the reason, given that there was no actual cost implication to the change to Calibri. Rubio is a true disappointment - at one time, I really did expect better. But he's increasingly an embarrassment to himself. What did he (or his people) achieve by giving the reason why?

It’s almost like “woke” describes things that are good.


+1
I can see these idiots doing just as you said though. Remove those ramps now! Billions of dollars in construction costs be damned!
Anonymous
Post 12/11/2025 11:57     Subject: No more calibri because it is accessible
Anonymous wrote:How is something that has been shown to be better for a wider number of people "woke"? This is like saying we should not have automatic door openers or ramps because they're unattractive and take away from the elegance of a building's architecture. I know it's not precisely the same, but I just can't believe he (Rubio) was stupid enough to share the reason, given that there was no actual cost implication to the change to Calibri. Rubio is a true disappointment - at one time, I really did expect better. But he's increasingly an embarrassment to himself. What did he (or his people) achieve by giving the reason why?

It’s almost like “woke” describes things that are good.
Anonymous
Post 12/11/2025 11:52     Subject: No more calibri because it is accessible
How is something that has been shown to be better for a wider number of people "woke"? This is like saying we should not have automatic door openers or ramps because they're unattractive and take away from the elegance of a building's architecture. I know it's not precisely the same, but I just can't believe he (Rubio) was stupid enough to share the reason, given that there was no actual cost implication to the change to Calibri. Rubio is a true disappointment - at one time, I really did expect better. But he's increasingly an embarrassment to himself. What did he (or his people) achieve by giving the reason why?
Anonymous
Post 12/11/2025 11:47     Subject: Re:No more calibri because it is accessible
I’ve learned after several decades in Legal practice that the people who obsess the most over old fashioned fonts and typing conventions tend to be the weakest on substance and most irrelevant in influence. Gives real “small d” energy.
Anonymous
Post 12/11/2025 11:39     Subject: No more calibri because it is accessible
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The only fonts suitable for this administration are Comic Sans and Wingdings.


thank you for this! I like it


Not even comic sans. Just wing dings.


It was worth circling back.