Anonymous wrote:I’m following this: keep tutors for the school year (need grant money) and bring back student monitors!!!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The new republican play book (the one promoted by the current US sec. of Education and her family --- DeVos/AMWAY kooks) is all about minimizing public education and maximizing religious-based private education.

So, it makes sense to make people afraid of their public schools (i.e. require the schools to notify all parents if any kid has a drug-related overdose, even if it happens away from the school), and make parents fear other schools by creating nonsensical "standards" that label many schools as "failing."

The only reasonable response when you are told your kid's school is a disaster -- is to try to get them into some other "better" school -- which is where they step in with state-funded vouchers!

This 1000%. Exhibit A is the shifting pass cut scores for the SOLs. Raising the cut scores will mean more kids will "fail" the SOL and make it appear that public schools in VA are not good for your kid. Cue the private schools with funding/vouchers that should go to public schools. Those same private schools that can choose which kids they want and kick out at any point.

Follow the money as the dismantling of public education happens before your very eyes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The new republican play book (the one promoted by the current US sec. of Education and her family --- DeVos/AMWAY kooks) is all about minimizing public education and maximizing religious-based private education.

So, it makes sense to make people afraid of their public schools (i.e. require the schools to notify all parents if any kid has a drug-related overdose, even if it happens away from the school), and make parents fear other schools by creating nonsensical "standards" that label many schools as "failing."

The only reasonable response when you are told your kid's school is a disaster -- is to try to get them into some other "better" school -- which is where they step in with state-funded vouchers!

This 1000%. Exhibit A is the shifting pass cut scores for the SOLs. Raising the cut scores will mean more kids will "fail" the SOL and make it appear that public schools in VA are not good for your kid. Cue the private schools with funding/vouchers that should go to public schools. Those same private schools that can choose which kids they want and kick out at any point.

Follow the money as the dismantling of public education happens before your very eyes.

Anonymous wrote:The new republican play book (the one promoted by the current US sec. of Education and her family --- DeVos/AMWAY kooks) is all about minimizing public education and maximizing religious-based private education.

So, it makes sense to make people afraid of their public schools (i.e. require the schools to notify all parents if any kid has a drug-related overdose, even if it happens away from the school), and make parents fear other schools by creating nonsensical "standards" that label many schools as "failing."

The only reasonable response when you are told your kid's school is a disaster -- is to try to get them into some other "better" school -- which is where they step in with state-funded vouchers!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A lot of “off track” and “needs intensive support” at the elementary level.

And what exactly will be the result of this designation? Are they actually going to GET the "intensive support" that they need? Or is this rating just another way to dump on our poorest schools?

It shouldn't come as any surprise that the most vulnerable populations need "intensive support" to keep up with their peers. If this designation puts them in line for additional resources, I'm all for it. If it's just another label so that the more well-to-do families can avoid them, well....

Fwiw, I'm a relatively high earner but kept my kids in our local Title 1 elementary school, which is labeled Off Track in this report, because we love the community and the school. The admin and teachers are top notch, but of course there is a large segment of the school population that needs real help. Labeling the school to scare people off doesn't help, but some additional resources really would.

How noble of you.

PP here. I never claimed to be noble. I kept my kids there because I genuinely like the school. The school is not failing, they are doing an excellent job with what they have.

My question is, if the state is going to label a school as "needs intensive support", I'd like to know what support is going to be recommended or offered. Or is the state just going to label it that way and then ignore it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A lot of “off track” and “needs intensive support” at the elementary level.

And what exactly will be the result of this designation? Are they actually going to GET the "intensive support" that they need? Or is this rating just another way to dump on our poorest schools?

It shouldn't come as any surprise that the most vulnerable populations need "intensive support" to keep up with their peers. If this designation puts them in line for additional resources, I'm all for it. If it's just another label so that the more well-to-do families can avoid them, well....

Fwiw, I'm a relatively high earner but kept my kids in our local Title 1 elementary school, which is labeled Off Track in this report, because we love the community and the school. The admin and teachers are top notch, but of course there is a large segment of the school population that needs real help. Labeling the school to scare people off doesn't help, but some additional resources really would.

How noble of you.

Anonymous wrote:Correct FCPS will have no one to blame but themselves. For as liberal as Fairfax is, the schools are completely segregated.

Sadly, not surprisingly, the student who are in the middle (non MLL, nonIEP, and nonAAP) are being forgotten. There are MLL students with no IEPs who work with five different adults in small groups per day (classroom teacher, high impact tutor, MLL teacher, reading specialist, math specialist). You could also throw in social worker, counselor, and school liaison if you wanted to. These are all people that any average, barely on grade level kid doesn’t even know exist. A student who scores just below grade level is just left to fend for themselves while their severely underachieving peers gets all the services.

Anonymous wrote:The new republican play book (the one promoted by the current US sec. of Education and her family --- DeVos/AMWAY kooks) is all about minimizing public education and maximizing religious-based private education.

So, it makes sense to make people afraid of their public schools (i.e. require the schools to notify all parents if any kid has a drug-related overdose, even if it happens away from the school), and make parents fear other schools by creating nonsensical "standards" that label many schools as "failing."

The only reasonable response when you are told your kid's schoo is a disaster -- is to try to get them into some other "better" school -- which is where they step in with state-funded vouchers!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not thing left to do is get rid of AAP in the ES level in hopes that repopulating classrooms with smart kids will help the basement kids.

Thankfully AAP exists to satisfy a legal requirement to actually teach those kids just like have for special ed, so those people will never get their wish.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A lot of “off track” and “needs intensive support” at the elementary level.

At the high poverty schools. I would bet the groups struggling are poor Black and Hispanic kids with little support at home.

And, this people, is why they want to redraw the boundaries. It hides the problem rather than fixes it.

This is a common assertion and yet it’s not what is happening with this boundary review.