Anonymous wrote:I don't like skiing in foreign countries. I've done it in Europe and Japan. But honestly, I don't anymore. Why? Several reasons, equipment, and the skiing experience never really exceeding what I can get here. But most importantly, because if I get seriously injured, I don't want to deal with being overseas. I'd rather be here in the United States without the complications.
So Park City for me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m planning a family Christmas ski trip and leaning heavily toward Park City. At first, I thought Europe would be a once-in-a-lifetime experience, with places like Avoriaz, Megève, or Zermatt. But when I actually talked to my kids, I started wondering if it’s really worth it right now.
Family setup: Two teens, 14 and 17. They are all about modern, comfortable spaces with ample room. Everyone needs their own room. We like newer interiors, hot tubs, and good amenities. When I asked them what they thought about skiing in Europe, their first response was "Will the Wi-Fi and internet even be good?"
Park City
First class flights from DC: about $900 per person
Lodging: ski-in ski-out near Silver Star or Town Lift, $10K to $20K for a large, modern home or condo
Lift tickets: Epic Pass options with military discount, about $2K to $3K total
Transfer: 45 minutes from SLC, $200 to $600
Total trip: $18K to $26K
Avoriaz
Business class flights to Geneva: about $3K per person
Lodging: ski-in ski-out places like L’Amara, but fewer modern large-unit options, $5K to $8K
Lift tickets: Portes du Soleil passes, about $1.6K to $2K
Transfer: shuttle plus snowcat, $600 to $1K
Total trip: $19K to $22K
Megève and Zermatt
Harder to find large, modern ski-in ski-out options
Transfers take longer and are less straightforward
Lodging can be pricier and more traditional
Here’s the dilemma: Europe has incredible scenery, culture, and huge ski areas. But for my kids, it may not matter. They want modern comfort, their own space, a hot tub, strong Wi-Fi, and food they like. If that’s what makes the trip fun for them, is there any point in dragging everyone across the Atlantic right now?
Would love to hear from anyone who has done both with teenagers. Did Europe blow them away, or did it ultimately not matter because all they wanted was space, comfort, and internet?
Should we save the Europe trip for when they’re older, or even just for the two of us? The last time we took an international trip, the kids were more excited about the free all-you-can-eat room service at the resort than touring Bali. It was honestly ridiculous. I hope they gained something from it. I think they did, but still.
I think you should work out why your kids sound like such brats. Maybe leave them at home, or at least put them in economy.
Look, we have kids that grew up skiing all over the world too. Never have they insisted on "modern comfort", a hot tub, or any of the other things. If asked, sure they like a hot tub. Their own rooms. But come on.....
Anonymous wrote:I wouldn’t do Park City period. CO has much better skiing
Anonymous wrote:Leave the teens at home. They sound like bores anyway.
Anonymous wrote:I’m planning a family Christmas ski trip and leaning heavily toward Park City. At first, I thought Europe would be a once-in-a-lifetime experience, with places like Avoriaz, Megève, or Zermatt. But when I actually talked to my kids, I started wondering if it’s really worth it right now.
Family setup: Two teens, 14 and 17. They are all about modern, comfortable spaces with ample room. Everyone needs their own room. We like newer interiors, hot tubs, and good amenities. When I asked them what they thought about skiing in Europe, their first response was "Will the Wi-Fi and internet even be good?"
Park City
First class flights from DC: about $900 per person
Lodging: ski-in ski-out near Silver Star or Town Lift, $10K to $20K for a large, modern home or condo
Lift tickets: Epic Pass options with military discount, about $2K to $3K total
Transfer: 45 minutes from SLC, $200 to $600
Total trip: $18K to $26K
Avoriaz
Business class flights to Geneva: about $3K per person
Lodging: ski-in ski-out places like L’Amara, but fewer modern large-unit options, $5K to $8K
Lift tickets: Portes du Soleil passes, about $1.6K to $2K
Transfer: shuttle plus snowcat, $600 to $1K
Total trip: $19K to $22K
Megève and Zermatt
Harder to find large, modern ski-in ski-out options
Transfers take longer and are less straightforward
Lodging can be pricier and more traditional
Here’s the dilemma: Europe has incredible scenery, culture, and huge ski areas. But for my kids, it may not matter. They want modern comfort, their own space, a hot tub, strong Wi-Fi, and food they like. If that’s what makes the trip fun for them, is there any point in dragging everyone across the Atlantic right now?
Would love to hear from anyone who has done both with teenagers. Did Europe blow them away, or did it ultimately not matter because all they wanted was space, comfort, and internet?
Should we save the Europe trip for when they’re older, or even just for the two of us? The last time we took an international trip, the kids were more excited about the free all-you-can-eat room service at the resort than touring Bali. It was honestly ridiculous. I hope they gained something from it. I think they did, but still.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is anyone else curious who has 26k for a single vacation but also qualifies for a military discount? Active duty married to hedge funder or big law partner?
I was actually more curious about what military family would tolerate/cater to such bratty sounding children
Definitely not army.
Not navy either, if our kids complained, they stay with grandma while we went skiing.
Anonymous wrote:I have skied in Europe twice with my teenager -- she loved it, but she loves international travel and new experiences. It's a different ski experience (we skied in Italy both times), with better food/atmosphere but iffier snow and slower lifts. We had a terrific time and on both trips we added on more days in Italy, so the trips were part skiing and part food/art/other culture, which I think is a major advantage to a European ski trip. That said, if you are going just for the skiing I wouldn't go at Christmas to either location, given crowds and likely snow conditions that early in the season, if you have some flexibility to go deeper into winter.
For the record, WiFi and cell service (using eSIMs) was just fine throughout our European trips. But that's a red herring -- sounds like the real issue is they may not be enthusiastic travelers, period. In that case, it might depend on your goals for this trip. Is it just to ski? Is it to get them out of their comfort zone and experience new places and cultures, ideally to spark a greater love of travel? Something else?

Anonymous wrote:American families who ski typically don’t go to Europe to ski. The alps and other mountain ranges are pretty but with our ski towns out west it’s not worth the expense and long flights. Picking up and taking your kids to Europe for Christmas to ski is something someone does who is clueless and thinks it sounds elite and must be the better option. Except it’s not and people who actually ski and travel know this.
Do you travel to Europe to go to the beach?
Anonymous wrote:Have you ever flown first class domestically? It is NOT worth it. That’s what, a 3 hour flight? Save your money.