Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So basically no neurotypical child ever gets “preferential” seating or partners?
Lovely.
“Preferential seating” doesn’t refer to highly coveted seats that are desired by all students; it means seating a student in a location that enhances their ability to learn. Students who have trouble seeing or hearing may need to be up front. Kids who need to be seated away from distractions may need to be seated where they can’t see out the windows. Students who need frequent redirection back to their work benefit from proximity to the teacher’s desk. Generally speaking, if a child has no disabilities, their performance doesn’t vary widely based on their seating.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s not rocket science, but it is a classroom, not a circus. There’s no excuse for children to be talking while a teacher is lecturing or students are to be completing work quietly. The teacher should not allow best friends to be talking if that means another child has to get an accommodation to avoid them. That’s insane. The classroom door can also be closed, and people in the hallway should be as quiet as possible knowing that classes are in session.
Since we can’t physically put tape over their mouths, and often times they won’t stop talking because of ADHD or they’re rude or disrespectful, how do you suggest we get them to stop talking?
Then they don’t deserve to be in the classroom. Suspend or expel them, and let their parents figure out how to educate them since they can’t figure out how to stop talking in class. Nothing will change until the parents are inconvenienced.
Ha! My principal said kids can’t even be sent to the office for talking out of turn. Kids can’t be suspended at all in the early grades, and in the upper grades only if they bring a weapon. There is no such thing as being expelled from elementary school. You are living in fantasyland.
So nobody gets to learn until the little darlings learn to keep their mouths shut when the teacher is talking? Again, until the parents are inconvenienced, nothing will change.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s not rocket science, but it is a classroom, not a circus. There’s no excuse for children to be talking while a teacher is lecturing or students are to be completing work quietly. The teacher should not allow best friends to be talking if that means another child has to get an accommodation to avoid them. That’s insane. The classroom door can also be closed, and people in the hallway should be as quiet as possible knowing that classes are in session.
Since we can’t physically put tape over their mouths, and often times they won’t stop talking because of ADHD or they’re rude or disrespectful, how do you suggest we get them to stop talking?
Then they don’t deserve to be in the classroom. Suspend or expel them, and let their parents figure out how to educate them since they can’t figure out how to stop talking in class. Nothing will change until the parents are inconvenienced.
Ha! My principal said kids can’t even be sent to the office for talking out of turn. Kids can’t be suspended at all in the early grades, and in the upper grades only if they bring a weapon. There is no such thing as being expelled from elementary school. You are living in fantasyland.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s not rocket science, but it is a classroom, not a circus. There’s no excuse for children to be talking while a teacher is lecturing or students are to be completing work quietly. The teacher should not allow best friends to be talking if that means another child has to get an accommodation to avoid them. That’s insane. The classroom door can also be closed, and people in the hallway should be as quiet as possible knowing that classes are in session.
Since we can’t physically put tape over their mouths, and often times they won’t stop talking because of ADHD or they’re rude or disrespectful, how do you suggest we get them to stop talking?
Then they don’t deserve to be in the classroom. Suspend or expel them, and let their parents figure out how to educate them since they can’t figure out how to stop talking in class. Nothing will change until the parents are inconvenienced.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There really are no good options in a class laden with IEPs/504s, etc. If this dynamic is a problem for you (it was for us), better to exit the system altogether.
Your assumptions that kids with IEPs/504s are problems and drains on the class is ignorant and vile. Please leave the public school system.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There really are no good options in a class laden with IEPs/504s, etc. If this dynamic is a problem for you (it was for us), better to exit the system altogether.
Your assumptions that kids with IEPs/504s are problems and drains on the class is ignorant and vile. Please leave the public school system.
Anonymous wrote:There really are no good options in a class laden with IEPs/504s, etc. If this dynamic is a problem for you (it was for us), better to exit the system altogether.
Anonymous wrote:So basically no neurotypical child ever gets “preferential” seating or partners?
Lovely.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My calm kid is always used as the therapy dog in classrooms. She hates it and we're leaving the school system.
Exactly. The reality is that, rightly or wrongly, families like ours — relatively well-resourced, with neurotypical and generally well-behaved kids — often end up being treated as resources for the system. Our children are positioned as stabilizing forces, expected to offset or buffer some of the more challenging dynamics in the classroom. And again, I’m not blaming anyone. I understand that in certain micro-level cases, this might even be the best solution for the group as a whole.
But over time, this becomes a structural feature of the system — not an occasional workaround. And what that means in practice is that the needs of the well-regulated kid, the quiet kid, the academically solid kid, get sidelined. Not maliciously, but inevitably, because there are legal, administrative, and behavioral imperatives that must be prioritized. And once you understand that dynamic, the incentive becomes clear: if you can exit to an environment where most of the families are in that same narrow band — reasonably stable home life, no major learning or behavioral hurdles — the educational experience becomes far more right-sized for your child.
That doesn’t mean it’s impossible to find in public school. But let’s be honest: the systemic incentive structure just doesn’t make that easy. So yeah, for many of us, the exit is not about elitism or snobbery — it’s just a rational response to an environment where our kids’ needs will always come second. And sometimes, third.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It isn’t one kid. These days it’s 1/4 of the class or more.
This is the problem. In my 5th period gen ed class of 30 high school students, I have 11 504s for adhd. All of them have the accommodation of "preferential seating near the point of instruction, away from distractions". I'd love for you to make my seating chart.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't sit the class clown next to a quiet kid "as a punishment" - that child is not a punishment.
Don't make one kid the regular partner for a disruptive or incapable student - everyone should have to take a turn.
Don't punish the class for individual behavior.
Don't let one kid scream at or mistreat another in the name of "they have to learn to work together." No adult would have to tolerate that from a peer.
That part is patently false.
No. As an adult, you can walk away from a rude person. You can quit a job, unwise as that may be. We don't let kids walk away.
K-12 school is the only environment, other than prison, where you have no ability to leave a situation and no ability to control who is around you. That means the burden is on the school and the teacher to ensure a respectful environment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't sit the class clown next to a quiet kid "as a punishment" - that child is not a punishment.
Don't make one kid the regular partner for a disruptive or incapable student - everyone should have to take a turn.
Don't punish the class for individual behavior.
Don't let one kid scream at or mistreat another in the name of "they have to learn to work together." No adult would have to tolerate that from a peer.
That part is patently false.