Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Check your privilege.
Most couples don't have the typical DCUM HHI. They afford townhouses in the exurbs on TWO salaries so they can raise their children. Most Americans can never aspire to DCUM salaries.
Shame on you. I despise posters like you.
Relax hombre. They didn't voice their opinion..they simply asked why people buy on the basis of 2 incomes..And they are not wrong. A lot of us can't see ourselves living in normal "basic" homes.
It took our 2 incomes to buy the most basic house available in the area. Truth is no one is building truly basic houses, but small, well designed SFHs are something our country definitely needs. Sorry but crowded stacked townhouses with no trees or access to outdoors suck.
Many promotions and a divorce later, it worked out because me and the kids got to stay in the “basic” house while ex traveled and worked. But our 80s house is not truly basic, it is merely basic compared to the 90s and beyond McMansions etc that followed.
Anonymous wrote:Why do people buy houses on the basis of 2 salaries instead of 1?
Wouldn't it better to buy on the basis of the spouse who has the lower salary? Wouldn't that be a better strategy to manage financial shocks if one spouse loses their job.
Anonymous wrote:People generally want the best lifestyle money can buy. They dont earn 2 incomes because they like working. They do it so they can spend more both now and in the future.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In our case, one spouse is an excessive spender who's always in financial trouble, and the other is too weak to say no.
So good plan for not overspending on the house. But have a reality check---staying with someone who is "always in financial trouble" is hard on a marriage. You need to find the way to say no and learn to separate your finances (I fully support combining them and dont' really get the not unless rare circumstances, and this is one case). if you choose to stay, you need to protect yourself
We file taxes separately and don’t have any joint credit cards. Also it’s only a matter of time until we get a divorce over financial and other issues. When I say no, he throws a tantrum and threatens me. That's how we ended up with a ridiculous mortgage, and that's not even the worst of it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Check your privilege.
Most couples don't have the typical DCUM HHI. They afford townhouses in the exurbs on TWO salaries so they can raise their children. Most Americans can never aspire to DCUM salaries.
Shame on you. I despise posters like you.
Relax hombre. They didn't voice their opinion..they simply asked why people buy on the basis of 2 incomes..And they are not wrong. A lot of us can't see ourselves living in normal "basic" homes.
Anonymous wrote:Why do people buy houses on the basis of 2 salaries instead of 1?
Wouldn't it better to buy on the basis of the spouse who has the lower salary? Wouldn't that be a better strategy to manage financial shocks if one spouse loses their job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also, why do people even *have* two salaries in the first place? Don't they know it's less stressful for everyone in the household if only one parent works? Someone should tell people this.
Please tell me about your lower stress life when your one income is threatened by the current administration's budget. I'll wait.
Anonymous wrote:Also, why do people even *have* two salaries in the first place? Don't they know it's less stressful for everyone in the household if only one parent works? Someone should tell people this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In our case, one spouse is an excessive spender who's always in financial trouble, and the other is too weak to say no.
So good plan for not overspending on the house. But have a reality check---staying with someone who is "always in financial trouble" is hard on a marriage. You need to find the way to say no and learn to separate your finances (I fully support combining them and dont' really get the not unless rare circumstances, and this is one case). if you choose to stay, you need to protect yourself
Anonymous wrote:In our case, one spouse is an excessive spender who's always in financial trouble, and the other is too weak to say no.
Anonymous wrote:This has got to be one of the dumbest and most out of touch posts I’ve ever seen on this forum, and that’s saying something.