Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Usually the parents spend more time on their careers than with the children.
+1
Successful parenting is a job in itself, if both parents have demanding careers it’s very hard to parent well.
Anonymous wrote:My husband and I are both extremely anxious overachievers from fairly dysfunctional homes. Our kids have so much anxiety (likely inherited) that it makes it difficult for them to handle life’s stressors. They have struggled socially, academically etc.
I wonder if they would have done better if both my husband and I had sought help for our anxiety earlier. It’s hard to conceptualize of a whole family though where everyone is on antidepressants, Zoloft etc. Sometimes we think of ourselves as kind of a generic cocktail that probably shouldn’t have been mixed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The initial post talks about intelligence a lot, but then the follow up talks about behavior.
Those 2 things have little to do with one another.
+1, and also this whole thread is really about one interaction with one family, from which OP is making all kinds of leaps. Just say "I am disappointed my nice friends have bratty kids."
I have known the family for a decade. It is not one interaction. Our kids go to the same school.
I was appalled at their poor behavior. However, they are also low performers at school. They quit all their sports. They hate their instruments.
Assuming this is elementary…How do you know who is a “low performer” at school? And based upon what criteria exactly? A lot of kids don’t enjoy organized sports or just try out different rec sports at this age (and perhaps don’t return the next season). A lot of kids think practicing instrument is a drag and only do it because their parents make them (raising my own hand on this one…ended up playing in the HS band and enjoying it very much).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The richer the family, the more likely the kids are on screens too much and on social media which sucks the life, intelligence, creativity right out of you. The rich families at our school have dedicated ipads for each kid and at age 10 they get a smartphone. I think it's kind of disgusting.
This isn't true. Statistically lower parental income and education levels correlate with more screen time usage by kids.
https://www.the74million.org/children-from-low-income-less-educated-families-spend-nearly-twice-as-much-time-on-screens/
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9107378/
Anonymous wrote:The richer the family, the more likely the kids are on screens too much and on social media which sucks the life, intelligence, creativity right out of you. The rich families at our school have dedicated ipads for each kid and at age 10 they get a smartphone. I think it's kind of disgusting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Usually the parents spend more time on their careers than with the children.
this right here. marching around the office, pretending to be a big shot while the family life and kids are left behind.
The Royal Family comes to mind.
Same with the Trumps and Bidens. Parents on some fundamental level should be accountable for how their children turn out. The Clintons, Obamas, and Bushs seemed to do well - they had all girls, maybe just a coincidence. Hunter and Douche Jr. are male obviously.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have noticed many parents we know who are superstars in their fields have average/below average children. The kids are not motivated.
I wonder if they were born less intelligent or it is their upbringing.
We just spent the weekend with a family whose parents are some of the most intelligent kind people we know. Their kids are an absolute disaster in every way possible.
Oh come on. Hard to believe this is not a huge exaggeration. How old are their kids?
Fighting, screaming, whining, hitting, complaining, being disrespectful 75% of the time. The parents just tune out. It is like they just accepted this poor behavior and don’t know what to do with the children.
I’m surprised how such competent people can be such horrible parents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Winston Churchill's kids were mostly duds. Same with the Vanderbilts. Many descendents of high profile people lose the genetic lottery. Bad parenting can be detrimental too.
I have two amazing female friends who married duds from these types of families. It sounds truly awful to be married to this type of man and then have to deal with their families. Unfortunately, their kids are also duds.
Anonymous wrote:Usually the parents spend more time on their careers than with the children.
Anonymous wrote:I have noticed many parents we know who are superstars in their fields have average/below average children. The kids are not motivated.
I wonder if they were born less intelligent or it is their upbringing.
We just spent the weekend with a family whose parents are some of the most intelligent kind people we know. Their kids are an absolute disaster in every way possible.