Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Get a life. Who remembers this shit?
I do, because it was the peak of my academic accomplishments, lol. It was a steady roll downhill from some stellar PSAT and SAT scores.
literally peaking in HS. Pathetic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Get a life. Who remembers this shit?
I do, because it was the peak of my academic accomplishments, lol. It was a steady roll downhill from some stellar PSAT and SAT scores.
Anonymous wrote:The scores really aren't comparable over different eras. Back in my day, anything over 1200 was pretty exceptional. Over 1300 was genuinely brilliant. It's very different today.
Anonymous wrote:The scores can’t really be directly compared, but i think that since the National Merit Program is set up on percentages, it gives a better idea. I was a NMF, one of my kids was also a NMF, and one was a Commended Student. So, even though the actual scores were different, the scores reflected a similar level of success with that particular test.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Me: SAT 1250 in 1987
Kid1: 34 ACT (Covid. Was unable to get a SAT test date)
KID2: 1560 SAT
Same poster. I learned that where a kid attends school makes a ton of difference.
At my high school, we had no AP classes and only 50% of the kids attended a four-year college. My kids attended a high-school with tons of APs and everyone went to a four-year college.
The combination of exposure to more challenging course work earlier in their school years and friendly school mate competition provided my kids both the learning and the ambition to do well in classes, tests, and college admissions.
Anonymous wrote:Get a life. Who remembers this shit?
Anonymous wrote:Me: SAT 1250 in 1987
Kid1: 34 ACT (Covid. Was unable to get a SAT test date)
KID2: 1560 SAT