Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, I do. I don't think it's most, but enough MAGA people seem itching for a fight that I've gone out and gotten a gun and learned to shoot it. I'm not interested in being a sitting duck should the time come because I stupidly took the stance of "it could never happen here." No, it absolutely could happen here, just as it has happened elsewhere throughout history.
What did you get, if you are willing to share? I’ve just started browsing online.
My husband is a super liberal democrat but he too is afraid to be in this country where everyone carries a gun except for him. He went out and got a shot gun and two rifles. My brother in law has an AR-15, a shot gun and multiple hand guns.
What’s he going to do when a MAGA takes that gun from him? Because that’s what’s going to happen.
Why would a MAGA take a gun from him? If they are doing it aggressively he will just shoot them.
Anonymous wrote:Do you truly think MAGA would be willing to go face to face and commit violence against all perceived liberal democrats - a la Rwanda? I know lots of people both conservative and liberal and I do think some of them would be willing to kill the opposite side if we were truly in a civil war.
Anonymous wrote:Good grief. This thread is over the top.
Just an observation - it is NOT the MAGA types causing mayhem in LA or NY or Dallas.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, look at the J6 insurrectionists. That was very very tame in comparison, but it showed that dictator Trump would not stop any violence in his name. I truly think many MAGA want a Gilead.
Weren't there fewer than 1,000 protesters on J6? How many other protests turned violent that can be called "MAGA" happened? Am scratching head trying to think of them.
How many rioters are in LA right now? How many people rioted in the summer of George Floyd?
That alone tells you how paranoid most of you are about "MAGA" that you can't even see the fatal flaw in your beliefs.
Takes two seconds to fact check this. No, there weren’t only 1000 people at the capitol on January 6.
From Grok:
About 10,000–12,000 protesters were at or near the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, with 800–2,500 entering the building.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why does everyone seem to think there would only be killing by MAGAs? I know plenty of Progressives who would be willing to do some killing. They’re not going to start the war, but once it’s started, they’re all-in.
These people are serious, too. They know Carlos hand to hand fighting disciplines and martial arts, they are experts with knives and edged weapons, they can improvise booby traps. They’d be able to take out MAGAs like they were squishing bugs.
I thought MAGA sees Progressive men as beta men. Do beta men own ar15s and use violence to deal with disagreements?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, look at the J6 insurrectionists. That was very very tame in comparison, but it showed that dictator Trump would not stop any violence in his name. I truly think many MAGA want a Gilead.
Weren't there fewer than 1,000 protesters on J6? How many other protests turned violent that can be called "MAGA" happened? Am scratching head trying to think of them.
How many rioters are in LA right now? How many people rioted in the summer of George Floyd?
That alone tells you how paranoid most of you are about "MAGA" that you can't even see the fatal flaw in your beliefs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, look at the J6 insurrectionists. That was very very tame in comparison, but it showed that dictator Trump would not stop any violence in his name. I truly think many MAGA want a Gilead.
Weren't there fewer than 1,000 protesters on J6? How many other protests turned violent that can be called "MAGA" happened? Am scratching head trying to think of them.
How many rioters are in LA right now? How many people rioted in the summer of George Floyd?
That alone tells you how paranoid most of you are about "MAGA" that you can't even see the fatal flaw in your beliefs.
Anonymous wrote:ICE is executing the 'due process will not be followed with regard to immigration' policy of the White House.
So are people saying that those who are combating ICE agents should be bearing arms? Would that be correct? And the rogue, amateur weapons like bricks and Molotov cocktails are not in line with the 2A?
Anonymous wrote:Yes, look at the J6 insurrectionists. That was very very tame in comparison, but it showed that dictator Trump would not stop any violence in his name. I truly think many MAGA want a Gilead.
I’ll be posting a slap in your face exchange between a White House reporter and your Führer.Anonymous wrote:Good grief. This thread is over the top.
Just an observation - it is NOT the MAGA types causing mayhem in LA or NY or Dallas.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good grief. This thread is over the top.
Just an observation - it is NOT the MAGA types causing mayhem in LA or NY or Dallas.
It's ICE. And we have Stephen Miller screaming at ICE to meet quotas because MAGA voted in TACO again.
ICE is not burning cars and throwing rocks and bricks and looting businesses and throwing Molotov cocktails and destroying buildings.