Anonymous wrote:If its an unexcused absence the teacher is not required to spend additional time to explain things they explained in class that was missed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^^
Ohhh so wrong, PP. The taecher should not set a precedent. The teacher acted appropriately. Kids don't get rewarded for what they are *supposed* to do.
I am a teacher. My email signature line includes something to the effect of "I read and answer emails during my working hours (__am until __pm) when I am not teaching class or otherwise committed."
Oh please. You are not getting inundated with emails from 8th graders wanting assignment clarifications. He emailed teacher his question several days before assignment was due, allowing plenty of time for her to respond during business hours. Which she did take the time to respond, just with snark, instead of anything helpful. OP, she is a crap teacher and the year is almost over. Yea!
He emailed her on Friday afternoon. Saturday and Sunday are non business days, and Monday was a holiday. Teachers are told to return all emails within 2 business days, which technically would have been by Wednesday afternoon.
So no.
But regardless, the student is owed nothing. No matter if the teacher received 1 or 100 emails asking about missing work, for an unexcused absence, "I'm sorry, I cannot help you" is an appropriate response. It sucks that parents' decision has consequences for the kid, but better to learn this now when grades don't really count for much.
Then she should have not responded if her policy is to not email during non business hrs. But to 1) respond 2) not be helpful is just petty.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^^
Ohhh so wrong, PP. The taecher should not set a precedent. The teacher acted appropriately. Kids don't get rewarded for what they are *supposed* to do.
I am a teacher. My email signature line includes something to the effect of "I read and answer emails during my working hours (__am until __pm) when I am not teaching class or otherwise committed."
Oh please. You are not getting inundated with emails from 8th graders wanting assignment clarifications. He emailed teacher his question several days before assignment was due, allowing plenty of time for her to respond during business hours. Which she did take the time to respond, just with snark, instead of anything helpful. OP, she is a crap teacher and the year is almost over. Yea!
He emailed her on Friday afternoon. Saturday and Sunday are non business days, and Monday was a holiday. Teachers are told to return all emails within 2 business days, which technically would have been by Wednesday afternoon.
So no.
But regardless, the student is owed nothing. No matter if the teacher received 1 or 100 emails asking about missing work, for an unexcused absence, "I'm sorry, I cannot help you" is an appropriate response. It sucks that parents' decision has consequences for the kid, but better to learn this now when grades don't really count for much.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^^
Ohhh so wrong, PP. The taecher should not set a precedent. The teacher acted appropriately. Kids don't get rewarded for what they are *supposed* to do.
I am a teacher. My email signature line includes something to the effect of "I read and answer emails during my working hours (__am until __pm) when I am not teaching class or otherwise committed."
Oh please. You are not getting inundated with emails from 8th graders wanting assignment clarifications. He emailed teacher his question several days before assignment was due, allowing plenty of time for her to respond during business hours. Which she did take the time to respond, just with snark, instead of anything helpful. OP, she is a crap teacher and the year is almost over. Yea!
Anonymous wrote:Doesn’t he have a friend he could ask?
.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^^
Ohhh so wrong, PP. The taecher should not set a precedent. The teacher acted appropriately. Kids don't get rewarded for what they are *supposed* to do.
I am a teacher. My email signature line includes something to the effect of "I read and answer emails during my working hours (__am until __pm) when I am not teaching class or otherwise committed."
Oh please. You are not getting inundated with emails from 8th graders wanting assignment clarifications. He emailed teacher his question several days before assignment was due, allowing plenty of time for her to respond during business hours. Which she did take the time to respond, just with snark, instead of anything helpful. OP, she is a crap teacher and the year is almost over. Yea!
Anonymous wrote:^^^
Ohhh so wrong, PP. The taecher should not set a precedent. The teacher acted appropriately. Kids don't get rewarded for what they are *supposed* to do.
I am a teacher. My email signature line includes something to the effect of "I read and answer emails during my working hours (__am until __pm) when I am not teaching class or otherwise committed."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If its an unexcused absence the teacher is not required to spend additional time to explain things they explained in class that was missed.
THIS.
Anonymous wrote:This is a life skill learning moment where he should have figured it out on his own. Think of a work situation- it’s always more impressive if someone just figures something out without bothering their boss. Ask a classmate or use context clues for the assignment and wing it. Asking the teacher to spend time sending a email to one of many students was not a savvy choice.