Anonymous wrote:FYI, just posted above re: NESCAC recruiting. I am reading about over recruiting in some posts and it does seem like that is a thing in some schools. That is not the case from what I saw with NESCAC. The schools are hard to get in and expensive. There are a lot of interested players who want to play but by the time you narrow the pool to those who can get in (even with coach support you need good grades/scores/etc.), afford the school (most NESCAC do not have merit and though most are need blind, they are very expensive schools if full pay), and play at the competitive level, the numbers shrink dramatically. Therefore, I don’t the coaches are over recruiting which is why I think they welcome walk-ons (if you have the talent).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My suspicion is that at a NESCAC, probably not. Those guys are all DI caliber athletes who chose to attend those schools. Probably more likely at other DIII schools.
The NESCAC conference is among the best D3 in the nation and most of those schools are amongst the most academically rigorous. The fact is, most of those schools have their pick of the best D3/low end D1 athletes (assuming they have the grades as well…which is a big if).
And I meant to add, none of these schools have walk ons that play, in any sport.
That’s a serious exaggeration.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My suspicion is that at a NESCAC, probably not. Those guys are all DI caliber athletes who chose to attend those schools. Probably more likely at other DIII schools.
Hahahaha. Maybe water polo or something esoteric. In a revenue sport, or even a main Olympic sport like track and field or wrestling, the NESCACs would be slaughtered by most D1 sports. The ivies are D1 and it’s an even when they beat a P5 team.
In tennis, they are more often than not athletes who could easily play D1 at other schools.
There are now D1 players that are literally pro tennis players that sometimes have tournament fees paid by their schools. There was a recent article about a UNC player that was allowed to win prize money but somehow went sideways with the NCAA for getting reimbursed for restringing her racquets. It was strange.
You claiming that D3 tennis players are that level?
Pp is way wrong about d3 vs d1 tennis
The gap between d3 and d1 tennis is larger than soccer.
D3 and d1 tennis players physically don’t even look like the same species such is the divergence in height / limb length (on the men’s side)
Anonymous wrote:Crew doesn't count. It's not an NCAA sport.
Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of volleyball players from this region who are walk-ons at D1 schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My suspicion is that at a NESCAC, probably not. Those guys are all DI caliber athletes who chose to attend those schools. Probably more likely at other DIII schools.
The NESCAC conference is among the best D3 in the nation and most of those schools are amongst the most academically rigorous. The fact is, most of those schools have their pick of the best D3/low end D1 athletes (assuming they have the grades as well…which is a big if).
And I meant to add, none of these schools have walk ons that play, in any sport.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My suspicion is that at a NESCAC, probably not. Those guys are all DI caliber athletes who chose to attend those schools. Probably more likely at other DIII schools.
The NESCAC conference is among the best D3 in the nation and most of those schools are amongst the most academically rigorous. The fact is, most of those schools have their pick of the best D3/low end D1 athletes (assuming they have the grades as well…which is a big if).
Anonymous wrote:My suspicion is that at a NESCAC, probably not. Those guys are all DI caliber athletes who chose to attend those schools. Probably more likely at other DIII schools.